At present I am not considering multi pack approach. Are there any nato navy or in general other navy got multi pack of brahmos class heavy missiles, except usa maybe ? not sure. Multipackaging approach is highly maintenance intensive & rely on long life cycle of many smaller parts , which is our case would be a handicap.
Not brahmos class.
Multipacking smaller missiles in larger brahmos vls, using brahmos vls as universal vls.
Large missiles like ad1, ad2,
And anti ship like brahmos, subsonic anti ship cruise missiles etc , single missile per vls.
China has universal vls in its latest ships.
Japan, south korea also have it.
modern/latest Russian warships are equipped with the UKSK VLS, which can handle a variety of missiles, though it's not considered a truly universal system, but even russia is moving towards universal vls with this development.
So every major navy either has universal standard vls, or partial universal standard vls implemented, except indian navy.
If its too cumbersome we can go with twin vls system.
One for airdefense missiles, designed to house a single large anti ballistic missile and more than other airdefense missiles per vls. Like two long range missiles, 2-3 medium range, 3-4 short range missiles per vls.
Another vls for anti ship/land attack missiles, to house, brahmos, subsonic cruise missile, future scramjet hypersonic missile, also probably smart torpedo carrying missile.
Though, is the S in smart, really stands for supersonic given its a derivative of shaurya missile.
Or it's an Hmart.
www.maritimegateway.com
www.navalnews.com
