Sukhoi Su-30MKI

Well yeah I meant squadron by squadron, but given the current geopolitical situation and rising tensions, would't it be more prudent to wait a bit?
No. R-37M is vital for MKI to remain effective against J-10CE and PL-15 combo. Plus, with R-37M our air-defence coverage would increase substantially 'cause MKI would work as part of our net-centric IADS which opens up multiple scenario where MKI can ambush PAF HVAs using R-37M even from lower altitudes.
 
No. R-37M is vital for MKI to remain effective against J-10CE and PL-15 combo. Plus, with R-37M our air-defence coverage would increase substantially 'cause MKI would work as part of our net-centric IADS which opens up multiple scenario where MKI can ambush PAF HVAs using R-37M even from lower altitudes.
Given our current stance of using the S400's 40N6 as an offensive weapon, could the R-37M integration not be taken at a slower rate? We will probably receive an export variant too. Though while its optimised for taking out HVTs, Pakistan is taller than it is wide, and given that their only real system is the Erieye, the R-37M could be inducted in a more gradual manner, allowing us to maintain operational availability for our fleet given the possibility that India might be able to reclaim PoK.
 
Given our current stance of using the S400's 40N6 as an offensive weapon, could the R-37M integration not be taken at a slower rate? We will probably receive an export variant too. Though while its optimised for taking out HVTs, Pakistan is taller than it is wide, and given that their only real system is the Erieye, the R-37M could be inducted in a more gradual manner, allowing us to maintain operational availability for our fleet given the possibility that India might be able to reclaim PoK.
IAF saw the need for R-37M post skirmish, so there is a definitive need for this. Just consider R-37M as our airborne 40N6, and then even PAF's future KJ-500 fleet is not safe and that too from multiple vectors;)
 
IAF saw the need for R-37M post skirmish, so there is a definitive need for this. Just consider R-37M as our airborne 40N6, and then even PAF's future KJ-500 fleet is not safe and that too from multiple vectors;)
That's fair, I'm just more concerned about the possibility of tensions boiling over immediately and how part of our fleet being grounded even temporarily would affect our operational readiness. Had the geopolitical situation been more stable, I would've also been all in on pushing it through ASAP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
That's fair, I'm just more concerned about the possibility of tensions boiling over immediately and how part of our fleet being grounded even temporarily would affect our operational readiness. Had the geopolitical situation been more stable, I would've also been all in on pushing it through ASAP.
On the contrary, IAF would like to implement fleet while upgrade due to current geo-political conditions and threat of war with Pakistan looming due to our abeyance of IWT. IAF know this hence they want induction of R-37M on to our MKI fleet ASAP.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Ironhide and Sathya
On the contrary, IAF would like to implement fleet while upgrade due to current geo-political conditions and threat of war with Pakistan looming due to our abeyance of IWT. IAF know this hence they want induction of R-37M on to our MKI fleet ASAP.

More the trump cards better for us..
Even during the war, we should update and add capabilities to surprise the enemy..

When S400 started offense , Entire PAF ran away..
 
On the contrary, IAF would like to implement fleet while upgrade due to current geo-political conditions and threat of war with Pakistan looming due to our abeyance of IWT. IAF know this hence they want induction of R-37M on to our MKI fleet ASAP.
Makes sense. I guess them attacking India while also having their forces stationed in Saudi Arabia, while being in a conflict with Afghanistan all whilst having no fuel would be either really stupid or just flat out suicidal. Though I saw the problem as more of Pakistan being both, and thus slightly unpredictable.
 
IAF saw the need for R-37M post skirmish, so there is a definitive need for this. Just consider R-37M as our airborne 40N6, and then even PAF's future KJ-500 fleet is not safe and that too from multiple vectors;)
Yup. Another feather in the cap of the IAF just like the installation post Operation Swift Retort & its aftermath saw SDRs been implemented in the IAF , long range missiles being procured etc .

We'd fight with what we have is the IA's motto . We'd get what we need post the operation / war is the IAF's motto. In more ways than one our armed forces mirror the in breds to our west . Just that if they're blind we're squint eyed. After all both spring from common roots .
 
This procurement will change nothing...... I was banned from other forum just for mentioning that world no. BVRAAM was found on ground along with one Rafale in last year engagement & no BVRAAM were fired by IAF. No purpose of buying such high end stuff if you are not going to use it anyway. These people are reactionary by nature, never been proactive.
 
Given our current stance of using the S400's 40N6 as an offensive weapon, could the R-37M integration not be taken at a slower rate? We will probably receive an export variant too. Though while its optimised for taking out HVTs, Pakistan is taller than it is wide, and given that their only real system is the Erieye, the R-37M could be inducted in a more gradual manner, allowing us to maintain operational availability for our fleet given the possibility that India might be able to reclaim PoK.
R-37m is far superior to the astra. This should not even be a discussion. If the Pakistanis can gethand on non export pl-15 then we definitely can get hands on non export r-37M.
The r-37me/rvvbd would still have 200km range. The rafales were themselves not used for BVR instead of dsi. Why position rafales when you could have used mirages instead.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PhotonVish
There's a typo there. Those 300 missiles will come for 1.2 billion USD not 1.2 million making it ~ 4 million USD / piece. That's a very expensive acquisition .
Worth it considering our flankers are sitting ducks against j-10's and j-16's and even j-20's.
Recent conflicts has proved that stealth is not as effective as previously assumed and a longer stick compensates for lack of stealth.
We infact need Astra Mk-3 and skysting integrated to the mki as soon as possible same for the rafale.
 
There's a typo there. Those 300 missiles will come for 1.2 billion USD not 1.2 million making it ~ 4 million USD / piece. That's a very expensive acquisition .
I mean not really considering the avg price of the meteor is around 5M per while the price of the AIM120Ds even after insane amounts of mass production is still at 2.5 m per and the aim 260 is going to be at least 1.5x more.
The astra mk2 will also be around the late 1 million to early 2 million price range. As for mk3 I doubt even BDL knows but wont be cheap cause SFDR.
 
I think we are getting the 400km version. All the more need to get 100+ su30mkis as well as su-57 being produced in India. If the budget allows get the su-75 too.
Yes, we're getting the real deal and after years of long wait, MKI is finally getting a BVR which suits its "Air-Dominance Fighter" moniker and from what I have heard is that IAF is pushing for a max load of 8 R-37M per MKI. Bear in mind that current Flankers carry 2 R-37M as standard configuration load.

Regarding 100 Su-30MKIs? No. IAF doesn't want more MKIs, they want more Rafale not because they think MKI is inferior to Rafale but because they think they are already too top heavy. So maybe they'll order 20-40 more at max and that's about it. Other reason IAF is not interested in 100 more MKIs is this: Su-57.

Regarding Su-57? Putin came last year to India for specifically selling Su-57 to us. Since nothing was announced, people assumed that no deal was reached. Yet on the contrary, multiple offers in principle regarding Su-57 was agreed upon by both India and Russia. And looks like we'll be directly procuring 40(to 60) jets from Russia while assembling 100(to 140) 2-seat jets at HAL Nashik. So overall we'll have around 140-200 Su-57/60 till 2035-40, which is a good number to counter PLAAF 1000+ 5th gen fighter fleet(the 2035 estimation).

That's our plan for now.