Okay, cheers.Lol so it seems after I finally brought myself to read it which I never did in the first place because my post was never a response to your post because if that had been the case I would have quoted your post and not repeat one of the main point if I was arguing against your post.
And hence would have not shot myself in the foot later on.
Now I understand why you didn't quote my post in your sarcastic reply because you thought I made the post in reply to your post and so you did the same.
My first post was in response to the general hubris that civilian targets cannot be targeted , so called escalation ladder and it steps from coming across such posts here and in other forums including think tank discussions and not in the context of your post. That was the reason why I wrote it .
I apologise for my 3rd post ( 179 )