The main ramp will remain the same for TEDBF, but the landing strip can carry 2 EMALS for AWACS, transports, and large UCAVs, even Rafale M. It won't change the inherent design of the ship itself.
From the American perspective, a mixed type isn't efficient. The Russians want to operate Su-57 from their carrier, so STOBAR is their best option, while catapults will launch other support aircraft. But the Americans prefer operating an inferior aircraft with inferior capabilities for the sake of more sortie generation and greater turnaround.
The IAF is using the same strategy to deal with China's superior aircraft. That's why they prefer their Rafale + AMCA strategy in order to maximise their strength over the PLAAF's weakness instead of just buying Su-57 and playing to their strengths.
The Russian strategy is to use less carriers, but better performing jets compared to the Americans.
Shouldn't affect us. We will either use American or DRDO's tech.