If you think that an open and full fledged
War is the way to Go , I dont think so
These Low level , Low Intensity
But Random and Unpredictable Attacks
Which Baba talks about are
More Disruptive and cause a lot of Chaos and confusion
Because the Cost of Operational
prepared ness becomes much higher
The material and human loss are in addition to it
So i guess we're talking on similar lines in terms of him being unreliable
coming to other details, we're currently playing a gandhian approach to our retaliation i see
were baiting them, internal issues are hurting us as well, what i think we're doing is revamping, there are tunnels being set up
near the LOC, were fixing our AD's and running drills, we arent hurting them for now, we're fixing us.
There were BIG breaches that allowed for our embarrassment on the 27th, from them knowing callsigns, breaching interpersonal data streams
to on ground assets helping them with the strike, there is a huge sanitization drive on.
Let me illustrate, when a VA enters a non peace zone, IAF/IA/LP all are made aware, the PA found that info somehow
and went to drop cotton balls near the VA's position, green flagged by their element on ground indicating the VA being mobile
IA MI must be working round the clock to sanitise all this.
CFV wise we can only operate at them via the LOC, IB would cause issues for us as well, the LOC right now with no snow is
open for them to monitor, they are on alert as well as us, they fire almost every 4th day, we retaliate
Are we crossing over, i doubt it, theyve moved enough AD up there to find paper planes as well, can we be funding proxies to do our work
now that is a theory i would love to float