- Dec 4, 2017
Usually fighting a dictatorship too and 50+ years ago.
When Wagner help oust democratically elected African governments and prop up dictatorships this decade it's a trade deal?
Russia’s Wagner Group in Africa: Influence, commercial concessions, rights violations, and counterinsurgency failureThe nominally private but state-linked Russian security company the Wagner Group's role in conflict zones in Africa poses a threat to democracy and rule of law on the continent, Federica Saini Fasanotti writes.www.brookings.edu
When in the last 30 years?
US gets on fine with Canada and Mexico and all of Europe with the exception of Russia and Belarus, but no mind, India gets on with them.
Your post is again an example of your endless BS, every single sentence you've written is very obviously and provably false or out-of-date. Ditto for everything you've posted in this thread.
Wrong again. Western electronics was prohibited from export to the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War.
They've already made a deal settling all territorial disputes with Russia, don't kid yourself. This makes it even more likely that Russia will side with China, because doing otherwise could lead to China changing their mind. I wouldn't be surprised if the text of deal included agreements about regarding China's claims in India.
China and Russia on Monday signed a pact that finally settled the demarcation of their 4,300-km (2,672-mile) border, the scene of armed clashes at the height of the Cold War.www.reuters.com
Is this another one of those statements where someone has to write an essay just to explain the differences that are completely obvious?Now whatever happened to the UK's agreement with China over Hong Kong? There's a secret clause that says "conditions apply" that only the Chinese can see on these paper contracts. It's invisible to everyone else.
Is this another one of those statements where someone has to write an essay just to explain the differences that are completely obvious?
And why would China risk taking Russia on when you're easier pickings and don't provide them oil or gas?
In an arial battle contested airspace between Russian jets and Western world SAM systems, Russian jets are more likely to be shot down than Western jets against Russian SAM systems. This is going to quite a lot of feathers truth be told. Long back when my teacher was working on Jaguars and MIGs, he was very much diplomatic how much better we could utilise them marginally higher, even with replacement storage materials, which were not infinite to say the least. Flying hours were so less compared to modern air forces of the time. That Russian factors are not going to go away pretending we can somehow manage to bring it at par with the best in business.German IRIS-T anti-aircraft defense in use in Ukraine today shot down a Russian Su-34 bomber in the Backhmut region. From the explosion we see that the Su-34 was heavily armed.
, take a look at the map before you start drooling. There is a good reason why wests chanting of china threat dint work.And why would China risk taking Russia on when you're easier pickings
Easier to take on India than Russia, time is on their side as regards Russia, it's a declining power hellbent on self-destruction with a falling population and GDP., take a look at the map before you start drooling. There is a good reason why wests chanting of china threat dint work.
Nope, all facts.All squirmy excuses. What you said applies to you as well.
To top what you claimed, the Russians haven't gone around destroying entire countries either.
& Russians sold S 400 to turdgon regimeRussia was probably wondering what could be worse than HIMARS 230mm GPS-guided rockets? Laser-guided 230mm rockets!
Now even moving targets are toast. A convoy could be moving along 80 km from the front, a little drone sees them, shines a laser on them and about 90s later bang, bang, bang......