No attempt was made to. Spending priorities. You cannot say someone lacks the capability unless they actually attempt something.It's not our fault that you lacked the capability to scale up from your technology demonstrators.
No attempt was made to. Spending priorities. You cannot say someone lacks the capability unless they actually attempt something.It's not our fault that you lacked the capability to scale up from your technology demonstrators.
Rather their earlier attempts caused enough political damage that they are too scared to try.They chose not to yes. There is no record of Britain spending money trying to create space launch capabilities during that period.
Spending priorities?
You cannot say someone lacks the capability unless they actually attempt something.
'Does not still explain'. Your cousin must be almost as dumb as you.Just like my five year old cousin. "I would have entire Oxford Dictionary in my head if I tried!". Does not still explain why he spells 'school' as 'iscool'.

Where I come from, it is called a cop-out.No attempt was made to. Spending priorities. You cannot say someone lacks the capability unless they actually attempt something.
In the words of Raj Koothrappali, he was 15 before his first solid bowel movement.
That might be a valid comeback if we were actually trying to launch satellites during this period.

Nothing to do with lack of capability.Care to explain what is wrong with that phrase?'Does not still explain'. Your cousin must be almost as dumb as you.![]()
EU rules meant it had to be counted so that we'd have to pay them more money, even though it isn't taxed. As it turned out it was only worth £10bn, or about 0.5%. At least that's what we told the EU.They might not have space launch industry, but they have the prostitution & drug peddling 'industry'.
Accounting for drugs and prostitution to help push UK economy up by £65bn
Adding 10 billion pounds to GDP. They could have had their own space program only if they could tax those 'industries'.
Why is the UK being asked to £1.7 billion more?
Britain is a victim of its own success, new European Union accounting rules and the open, services based nature of the British economy with a big financial sector.
The reason why Britain has to pay the most back is mainly because of the growing gap between the better performance of the British economy, the success of the City of London in contrast to stalled growth in the eurozone.
I could believe that. It takes a lot of money with little payback.Actually you know we could have already landed a man on the moon by now. It's just that we didn't try.Nothing to do with lack of capability.
'Still does not explain'.Care to explain what is wrong with that phrase?
Nope, spending priorities.That's already an indication of lack of capabilities.
I could believe that. It takes a lot of money with little payback.


I wanted to convey why he still spells 'school' wrong at an age of 5. Which I guess is lost on you.'Still does not explain'.
We would if we felt they were useful in any way but diesel propulsion doesn't fit with their current usage.
Why do you need French help? Replace the nuclear reactor with a diesel engine. It's not rocket science.
Tejas is similar to Gripen C in the same way that my *censored* is similar to J-Lo's.
You still don't understand grammar but perhaps your 5 year-old cousin will have better luck in time. Maybe you should join him at iscool.I wanted to convey why he still spells 'school' wrong at an age of 5. Which I guess is lost on you.
UK had 50 years after their little experiment and they failed to make a workable launcher. Yet, here you are, telling me how you folks could have made a SLV, if you tried. So much for the land of Newton.
Sure! Spending priorities! UK spends 46 billion GBP on 'defence' without having a single mortal enemy in Europe. UK has enough money to bomb Middle East. But for space expenditure, it is spending priorities. And I have a bridge to sell to you.Nope, spending priorities.