Okay so prove me wrong. After 1971's little experiment, how many more satellites were launched by UK using its own capacity? How many active launch vehicles UK has?Nope, that's just your butt-hurt posting.
The answer is a BIG ZERO.
Okay so prove me wrong. After 1971's little experiment, how many more satellites were launched by UK using its own capacity? How many active launch vehicles UK has?Nope, that's just your butt-hurt posting.
We were the fourth country to launch a satellite. I don't see how that's failing at rocket science. Just a matter of spending priorities.
But not for long. We will no longer have to put bids out to the EU even.Which already depends on foreign launchers. Unless you want protectionism in space as well.
Of course every new start up in that field promise the moon. What's new in that ?
More insults. At least they fart gas not liquid.

Spending priorities doesn't mean an absence of knowledge or learning.Okay so prove me wrong. After 1971's little experiment, how many more satellites were launched by UK using its own capacity? How many active launch vehicles UK has?
The answer is a BIG ZERO.
India's first satellite launch was only 40kg over a decade later.With one launch. Of a 150 kg nanosatellite in LEO.
But not for long. We will no longer have to put bids out to the EU even.
Whatever Mr. Vindaloo aftermath liquid rocket.Whatever, Mr. Fart sampler.![]()
Many of the launches will be by the government, the rest will be launched via home spaceports, rather than being transported elsewhere.They'll look for the cheapest option, and might not be Britain.
And tall claims won't make any difference.
Whatever Mr. Vindaloo aftermath liquid rocket.
Spending priorities doesn't mean an absence of knowledge
That might be a valid comeback if we were actually trying to launch satellites during this period.And we could do 3 tonnes in 1994, 5 tonnes in 2001 & 12 tonnes in 2017. Yours is ZERO kg exactly.
Spending priorities? You are telling me a nation with a government having revenue of about a trillion dollars was not able to find 1 billion dollars to build infrastructure for space capabilities? Heck Indians put a satellite around MARS for 75 million dollars. Heck 375 million dollars if you take previous infra expenses in account too.Spending priorities doesn't mean an absence of knowledge or learning.
Many of the launches will be by the government
With a correct application of hygiene it's marvellous but boy-oh-boy does it cause problems in India. In the words of Raj Koothrappali, he was 15 before his first solid bowel movement.Given that your kind loves curry, that might help Britain do a manned spaceflight.
That might be a valid comeback if we were actually trying to launch satellites during this period.
They chose not to yes. There is no record of Britain spending money trying to create space launch capabilities during that period.Spending priorities? You are telling me a nation with a government having revenue of about a trillion dollars was not able to find 1 billion dollars to build infrastructure for space capabilities? Heck Indians put a satellite around MARS for 75 million dollars. Heck 375 million dollars if you take previous infra expenses in account too.
None of your business.Your government would need microsatellites ? What for ?
Just like my five year old cousin. "I would have entire Oxford Dictionary in my head if I tried!". Does not still explain why he spells 'school' as 'iscool'.That might be a valid comeback if we were actually trying to launch satellites during this period.