Transport Aircraft of IAF - C-130J, C-17 Globemaster, C295: Updates & Discussions

USAF,RuAF,ChiAF dozens of other disagree with IAF opinion( if its really is true)
Which platforms do USAF and RuAF use? Chinese air force uses because they don't have any other option.

What is the service celling for turboprop? When it comes to aewc aircraft higher the fly the further the can watch. So dozens of air forces agree with the IAF. Except the Pakistanis and the Chinese ofcourse due to financial and technical constraints.
 
Last edited:
Which platforms do USAF
USN mainly as USAF has only very few of these. Also operated by JASDF, IAF, Taiwan,Singapore,Egypt, and France

e-2c-hawkeye_011.jpg

Yak-44.jpg

for maritime role
366472_800.jpg

use? Chinese air force uses because they don't have any other option.
Really ?
They do have these
KJ2000_at_2014_Zhuhai_Air_Show.jpg

and these
KJ-500_(cropped).jpg
 
Last edited:
USN mainly as USAF has only very few of these. Also operated by JASDF, IAF, Taiwan,Singapore,Egypt, and France

e-2c-hawkeye_011.jpg
There is a difference btw USAF ( as you mentioned) and USN. Try maintaining and taking off a turbofan from an aircraft carrier.

The rest of the airforces you mentioned have a similar issue I mentioned above. Affordability
Yak-44.jpg

for maritime role
366472_800.jpg
Again the similar logic as above.

Second pic - Maritime surface reconnaissance is its main role. AEWC is a secondary role.
Really ?
They do have these
KJ2000_at_2014_Zhuhai_Air_Show.jpg

and these
KJ-500_(cropped).jpg
The first pic - they have only 5 of those because they couldnt get their hands on more. As mentioned above, due to financial and technical constraints

"In March 2011, Russia/China negotiations reached a new agreement to move production of IL-76s to Chinese owned companies. In this way it is expected production can be run smoothly to supply China with new IL-76 airframes, while delivery of Soloviev D-30KP-2 engines is not affected by recent issues.[3]
Due to unreliable external supplier sources, China has developed a backup known as the KJ-200 by installing a simplified system on board the Shaanxi Y-8. This aircraft has a similar configuration to that of the KJ-2000 and is characterized by the triple tail-fin configuration (one large and two small)."



Second Pic - That's what I said Chinese you turboprop aircraft.

Probably ill help with a google search for the difference - turboprop vs turbofan - Google Search
 
Last edited:

Airbus has singed a deal with Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL) under the C295 aircraft programme of Indian Government for the manufacture and supply of Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) and Missile Approach Warning System (MAWS).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aditya b7777
Manish K Jha: You mentioned C295 transport aircraft. Could you talk about the progress in setting assembling line and manufacturing components/sub systems?

Defence Secretary:
It is moving at good pace and it is being monitored by a committee headed by DG Acquisition.

The project is moving as per schedule. The transport aircraft C-295 has 13200 detailed parts, 4600 sub-assemblies and all seven major component assemblies. These are outer wings, center wings, box, nose fuselage, center fuselage, appendages and doors. These key components will be done in India. Besides, two testers for these parts and major sub-assemblies will be done in India. Assemblies of aerostructure, including the subassemblies will be all done in India. The various systems such as engines, landing gear, avionics, EW suite will be done in India.

For the first time, we are in the process of introducing the testing and certification system by the industry for the product. And this will be in line with the best global practice. We are using this learning to actually enable our industrial ecosystem system to start doing own testing and certification for other airworthy products also.

So, overall, 96 percent of the total manhour per hour which Airbus used to employ at its manufacturing facility of Spain is planned to be undertaken here in India. The ninety six percent– is the level of indigenization. There are going to be more than 125 MSMEs suppliers who will contribute in manufacturing C-295 in India.

These supplies will be NADCAP certified. National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program (NADCAP) is a global certification agency. So, we will have 125 new NADCAP certified suppliers for the global supply chain. NADCAP is the global quality assurance system. More than 42.5 lakh manhours of work will be generated in India and large number of jobs will be created. So, it’s one of the very intensely make in India projects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin
I do not expect India to make a move before the Super Hornet line is closed down for good. It's an Indian tradition. For example they waited until the Mirage 2000 line was dismantled before saying they wanted more, and they waited until the C-17 line was dismantled before saying they wanted more. It's just how things go in India.
C17 case is infact a tragedy. Dont know what IAF will do after il-76 ends its service life.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lolwa
C-130j:
Payload main: 42,000 lb (19,051 kg)
Range: 1,800 nmi (2,100 mi, 3,300 km) at max normal payload (34,000 lb (15,422 kg))
I guess that's the problem when you live in a French bubble.
Maximum Allowable Payload44,000 pounds (19,958 kilograms)
Range at Maximum Normal Payload2,417 miles (2,100 nautical miles)
Range with 40,000 pounds of Payload2,390 nm/4,425 km
 
Last edited:
Il-76MD/TD: Range with 52-tonne payload: 4,400 km (2,700 mi, 2,400 nmi)
A-400 M: Range with 30-tonne payload: 4,500 km (2,450 nmi)

2 A-400 M can replace one Il-76MD/TD.
I would prefer that anything that's a joint European effort is kept away from our services.
Every modern joint effort is a mess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lolwa