Ruling party need absolute majority, Politicians can do everything to be in power. Pushing LOC 15-20 km inside pok and taking haji pirr is enough for them to create huge public support. Bureaucrats ego will not allow them to listen to military advise, they only listen when they want power. Everything is human psychology. Politician's want to be alive, so they avoid anything which harms them physically. We will rule the world only when we get leader ready to fight and die for country. Politician's are not leader, Politician's don't take responsibility, Politician's play dirty games with their citizens, Politician's are not ready to die for their country. Politician decide according to crowd's emotion. We would have captured Pok, Aksai chin and other territory. Pakistan and bangladesh is our land. Tibet Kailash mansarovar is our land. But because of politician's we have lost everthing. Who give power to politician's, it's citizens. Politician's and citizens are equally responsible for everthing happened to our country. Not every citizens are going to accept this truth. But truth is truth. Citizen's are responsible and will be held accountable because they don't ask politician's and blindly follow them and Easily get impressed by politician for their minor act of nationalism.
Pahalgam terror attack: 26 killed
- Thread starter Tatvamasi
- Start date
- Status
Exactly, Destroying their War Machine should be our Aim
Given their economy and industrial capacities, it would take them a lot of time and money to replace the lost assets
No country will give anything free to them
That should be plan. Destroy their entire navy, airforce and army along with retaking POK. We need to ensure their complete annihilation for our prosperity. No half measures will cut it now.
While that has always been the case, sometimes the rules change, even if it's temporary, 'cause actions are dictated by the adversary as well.
Absolute destruction would cross the nuclear threshold, but destroying 10-20% alone would set them back by a decade. They struggle to buy just 200-300 tanks every decade, never mind fighter jets. Too much destruction would bring in foreign funding, which is undesirable.
You see bro now why I was obsessing over PL-15s:
Remaining one step ahead of the threat ensures survivability in war.
@randomradio, @vstol Jockey, @marich01, @_Anonymous_, @Parthu, @Speedster1, @YoungWolf, @Ironhide, @Milspec, @nair, @Asterion Moloc, @Ankit Kumar et al
Looks like Pakistan's abbujan sent real PL-15s this time around rather than PL-15E. Both have got different propellants which ensures better kinematics of the former. IAF needs to pay attention to this missile and devise a counter, IMO.
The source is this :
This a twitter handle. And they are saying it is 200KM range missile PL-15. Question is, how the hell do they know and if they are telling the truth.
More funny thing: They are showing it on JF-17... That has an AESA radar with range of 170 KM only... that too with liquid cooled variant. JF-17 Block 3 has air cooled variant so expect lesser range. Not to mention these are detecting ranges... tracking one will be still lesser. So I wonder, what good will a 200KM range missile do on JF-17.
These folks could have shown J-10s. But then they went greedy to show their strength in numbers too.
These folks could have shown J-10s. But then they went greedy to show their strength in numbers too.
Just yesterday or maybe the day before, there were reports that Israel had delivered PGMs to India. I'm fairly sure this piece of news is to counter that. Stratcom is clearly a psy-ops Twitter handle run by ISPR.
But PL-15 does have a range of 200km as confirmed by Huitong over at Chinese Military Aviation Blog. No mention of AESA seeker though.
Yes, indus basin has high crop yield. But that has more to do with the type of soil in these areas, not just river water.
Seriously
.Less water means easier to cross?
The war which will start in 1-2 weeks. How strong is Pakistan Air force? compare to us.
Indians are real genius " sarcasm alert".
I never heard from any Pakistani that canals are built for defense.
I guess Indian dreams about Pakistan destruction are wetter than the canals
Are you in Pakistan? what is the current situation in Pakistan?Yes, indus basin has high crop yield. But that has more to do with the type of soil in these areas, not just river water.
Seriously
Less water means easier to cross?
What's the situation in India after airspace blockage for Indian passenger planes?
Thousands of extra miles for Indian airlines and expensive jet fuel.
No one cares. Still 1000 planes are in order with Airbus and Boeing.Nothing got cancelled.Hope you got the mood.
Started the thread already ?
I thought it ll progress from Pahalgam terror thread -> Loc thread -> War thread.
We are still in Pahalgam thread.
That being said longer we are in first & second thread , more damage to Pak.
Seems like they have prepared early/ fast for any Indian response to terror attack .
Who ll benefit from this war?
Asim Munir will extend his tenure as chief
Chinese will avoid India cashing on trade war
Pak will drag down India s growth together with them since they're lost case anyways.
Should India make it beneficial for it..
Should keep Pakistan under war threat for longer time, breaking it economy
Correcting oulllll
I thought it ll progress from Pahalgam terror thread -> Loc thread -> War thread.
We are still in Pahalgam thread.
That being said longer we are in first & second thread , more damage to Pak.
Seems like they have prepared early/ fast for any Indian response to terror attack .
Who ll benefit from this war?
Asim Munir will extend his tenure as chief
Chinese will avoid India cashing on trade war
Pak will drag down India s growth together with them since they're lost case anyways.
Should India make it beneficial for it..
Should keep Pakistan under war threat for longer time, breaking it economy
Correcting oulllll
are you in pakistan? or in UK? What is the current situation in pakistan? are your military going to attack first ? what are your air force capabilities?
- Status