MMRCA 2.0 - Updates and Discussions

What is your favorite for MMRCA 2.0 ?

  • F-35 Blk 4

    Votes: 44 16.4%
  • Rafale F4

    Votes: 205 76.5%
  • Eurofighter Typhoon T3

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • Gripen E/F

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • F-16 B70

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • F-18 SH

    Votes: 10 3.7%
  • F-15EX

    Votes: 11 4.1%
  • Mig-35

    Votes: 2 0.7%

  • Total voters
    268
  • Poll closed .
Honestly the f-35 fits the same role as the rafale. That is Deep strike interdiction and electronic warfare. It wouldn't be used as an air superiority fighter. That's why I was shilling for the f-15EX and f-35 combo to make the Amreekis happy. But to actually employ the f-35 in any significant measure we need to get Patriots paac-4, f-15EX, f-16 blk70, E-3/E-7's to actually employ the f-35 to its maximum potential. We have already wasted a lot of time and money getting the Rafales at this point. We need to just get su-57 licens eproduction and start working on fifth and sixth gen air warfare and focus on developing the Tejas mk1a,mk1b, MW2 and mk2a. Need license production of ge-404 and ge-414 because Kaveri is stillborn for the foreseeable future.
That's why I'm saying there is no point of buying F-35 bcz we will have both F-4 & F-5 rafale under MRFA. And There is no significant use of F-15EX & blk 70 to pay such high amount of money just to make uncle Sam happy.
Yeah we need 5th gen jet that's most probably gonna be Su-57 with Izdeliye-30 engine.
Just hope that GE-414 doesn't repeat the same story of 404. We need MK2 in high numbers to fill the squadron strength.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hydra
This one.


The transfer of source code will be a non-negotiable condition in the Indian Air Force (IAF)s’ upcoming contract for 114 multi-role fighter aircraft (MRFA), sources confirmed, underlining the service’s insistence on operational flexibility and long-term self-reliance.

The procurement process is underway and is expected to reach the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) soon for approval of the Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), which is the formal authorisation to initiate acquisition procedures. Sources emphasised that the new jets will be able to integrate indigenous weapons as required and maintain seamless communication with aircraft of foreign origin, ensuring full interoperability.

“The permission to integrate weapons as per force requirements will be non-negotiable,” a source said. “Similarly, connectivity with other aircraft, even if from a different manufacturer, will be mandatory.” Following DAC approval, the proposal will move to the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) for final clearance.

Only then will formal contract and cost negotiations begin. The medium-category fighters are expected to complement the IAF’s Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) fleet and the future Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), with budget provisions for existing programmes already secured. Sources stressed that MRFA induction will not affect other projects.
 
This one.


The transfer of source code will be a non-negotiable condition in the Indian Air Force (IAF)s’ upcoming contract for 114 multi-role fighter aircraft (MRFA), sources confirmed, underlining the service’s insistence on operational flexibility and long-term self-reliance.

The procurement process is underway and is expected to reach the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) soon for approval of the Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), which is the formal authorisation to initiate acquisition procedures. Sources emphasised that the new jets will be able to integrate indigenous weapons as required and maintain seamless communication with aircraft of foreign origin, ensuring full interoperability.

“The permission to integrate weapons as per force requirements will be non-negotiable,” a source said. “Similarly, connectivity with other aircraft, even if from a different manufacturer, will be mandatory.” Following DAC approval, the proposal will move to the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) for final clearance.

Only then will formal contract and cost negotiations begin. The medium-category fighters are expected to complement the IAF’s Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) fleet and the future Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), with budget provisions for existing programmes already secured. Sources stressed that MRFA induction will not affect other projects.

The focus of the debate is not the acquisition of the Rafale but at what cost.Weapons integration is key and so is signature management.


For eg. Active Stealth is fine tuned for signature management with a range of weapons (French/European).


Depending upon the mission profile , signature management/cloaking with a Meteor/Hammer load-out vs an Astra/SAAW is going to be widely different , will need a lot of testing and the costs will be prohibitive.


Similarly SPECTRA algos are tuned with a range of French/European jammers , decoys and countermeasures.


Replacing any component is this tightly coupled ecosystem with own equipment will require major mods and Dassault will indemnify itself against subpar outcomes despite charging enormous amounts of money.


The architecture and ecosystem is built to be monopolistic from its inception.We will be buying our way into an uber expensive market place with every new feature costing us a hand and a leg.


Regardless of the drum beating , the number of indigenous weapons and sensors on the Rafale will be extremely limited.The @IAF_MCC will end up breaking the bank buying luxe reloads.


The lifecycle costs with performance based logistics (PBL) and upgrades will be prohibitive and borderline unsustainable.


All talks of affordability are based on the India Growth Story.What happens when the economy tanks for say half a decade ?


Needs deliberation at the highest levels.Any decision made on optical cues
which draws blood from the brain and sends it to you know where can be fatal.


Think of the inkjet printer vs the cost of the cartridge analogy and you sum it up.A lot is at stake for those in the know.The rest is white noise.
 
Honestly, aren't their fears basically the truth? The long term goal should be to boost private sector participation so you develop strong competition that attracts talent and produces modern products. HAL will continue to get business through tejas & super sukhoi program for the next few decades, long enough time for the current crop of babus and whatever else to retire out. HAL should be slowly trimmed down & leadership streamlined during this period. In the future they can super specialize on special mission crafts, engines, & other high end components. HAL will become smaller but more specialized and continue existing. Combat jets, helicopters, trainers, drones, passenger jets, etc should all just be left to the domain of the private sector.

Private sector can use experience gained from rafale deal and partner with France on developing an indianized fcas. During the development period the private sector will get a lot of experience working on however many amca platforms are ordered as well as drones, rafales and other civillian craft. When this 6th generation jet is ready the industry will be in a much better position to hit the ground running. Even HAL can get some business by supplying some of the special indian components that will have dervied from amca program. Would be cool to see something like the yak130/m346 but for a 6th gen fighter between France and India.
 
How capable is rafale against J-35 ? Can you explain it technically. Because that's the jet rafale gonna face in the near future.
How is the J-35 potent against Rafale ?
Stealth is not an invisibility cap. Despite ground radars and SAM, a turkish air base in Lybia was bombed (by supposed Egypt Rafale) some years ago....
 
Honestly the f-35 fits the same role as the rafale. That is Deep strike interdiction and electronic warfare. It wouldn't be used as an air superiority fighter. That's why I was shilling for the f-15EX and f-35 combo to make the Amreekis happy. But to actually employ the f-35 in any significant measure we need to get Patriots paac-4, f-15EX, f-16 blk70, E-3/E-7's to actually employ the f-35 to its maximum potential. We have already wasted a lot of time and money getting the Rafales at this point. We need to just get su-57 licens eproduction and start working on fifth and sixth gen air warfare and focus on developing the Tejas mk1a,mk1b, MW2 and mk2a. Need license production of ge-404 and ge-414 because Kaveri is stillborn for the foreseeable future.
There is no need for the f-15ex when we have the su30mki which can also be upgraded.
 
I am not talking about war fighting intention, talking about lack of deterence.

Their fourth generation aircraft inventory alone more than 1000. Fifth generation aircraft inventory is more than our MKI inventory. And cherry on top,thir upcoming sixth generation aircrafts. They are vastly superior now and our deternce is long gone.
I agree. Your main problem is the lack of decision, or the time to take one.
Just imagine you purchased the Mirage 2000 assembly line appart a purchase of 126 "-5" .... It may have helped HAL to built a modern fighter, you may have ordered some more with an indian package weapon system, and developp without pressure your Tejas.... What a pity.
 
You can't evaluate the fifth-generation threat through a narrow lens. Countering stealth platforms does not rely solely on possessing another stealth aircraft. It requires an integrated air-defence ecosystem combining advanced sensors, networked fighters, and layered surveillance. Ofcourse a stealth aircraft would help here, however for that it needs to be well integrated into the network. The problem with F-35 is the uncertainty around that. Uncle Sam won't allow us to integrate it properly with our IACCS.
 
MK2 is equivalent in every way to the Gripen-E/F, a credible competitor to the Rafale.
We can say that once the developpment phase over. It has even not began !
Gripen E/F is not a competitor to Rafale. Less range, less load, less independance (US engine...).
A contributor to this forum said a couple of years ago that Gripen E is 60% as potent as Rafale for 80% of its price.
You can't evaluate the fifth-generation threat through a narrow lens. Countering stealth platforms does not rely solely on possessing another stealth aircraft. It requires an integrated air-defence ecosystem combining advanced sensors, networked fighters, and layered surveillance. Ofcourse a stealth aircraft would help here, however for that it needs to be well integrated into the network. The problem with F-35 is the uncertainty around that.
F-35 main problem is now Trump.
 
IMG_6211.jpeg
Wait a god damn minute... does that mean current rafales flying in India are not .... integrated with Indian ground radar? what about AWACS?
F-35 main problem is now Trump.
Naaah. its other way round.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: darshan978
I agree. Your main problem is the lack of decision, or the time to take one.
Just imagine you purchased the Mirage 2000 assembly line appart a purchase of 126 "-5" .... It may have helped HAL to built a modern fighter, you may have ordered some more with an indian package weapon system, and developp without pressure your Tejas.... What a pity.
No. HAL had the MKI line, but they/ADA didn't make Tejas on time and is still not fully done. No amount of TOT will grand you the design capability, you cannot transfer the know how even if you want to transfer with full heart ( its as impossible as transfering your consciousness to other body). That thing you have to develop by yourself.
There is no need for the f-15ex when we have the su30mki which can also be upgraded.
Wring statement.
 
Shows GOI have realised the urgency. Its matter of few years we gonna face pak china co ordinated military attack on as, probably aling with BD.

Already faced this is why Pakistanis were able to engage IAF. The radar coordination between China and Pakistani airforce was there.
 
Already faced this is why Pakistanis were able to engage IAF. The radar coordination between China and Pakistani airforce was there.
They have satellite access. Most likely Beidou Sats were being used for surveillance. In any real event war with the Cheenis. We will have to take out their Satellites. Massive investment in anti-sat weaponry needs to be done.
 
Wait a god damn minute... does that mean current rafales flying in India are not .... integrated with Indian ground radar? what about AWACS?
The rafales pretty much fought barely integrated with IACCS. It seems like. I think it was vstoljockey who said that Rafales couldn't be used when the s-400's were active because of lack of integration with the IACCS. The Su-30 and jaguar turned out to be our best strike fighter on the second third day. Simply because of superior integration. The rafales need to be completed integrated with IACCS, astra mk1 mk2 integration and work on the brahmos ng needs to be accelerated.