To discredit the enormous advantage of the F-35, they say that "fifth generation" is a marketing term invented by Americans.
The Russians actually. The Americans started calling it 5th gen only after the Russians did.
To discredit the enormous advantage of the F-35, they say that "fifth generation" is a marketing term invented by Americans.
Classic French rap.Electronic stealth is better than static stealth for several reasons:
- Static stealth requires you to always use the same tactic, which eventually becomes well known to enemies who can counter it.
- Electronics evolve faster than metalwork, and this evolution has been going on for more than 20 years.
- Electronic stealth can be used in all directions, whereas static stealth is only effective in the direction of the signal transmitter. As a result, only electronic stealth can counter multistatic radars.
- Electronic stealth does not come at the expense of the aircraft's other qualities, unlike static stealth.
Manpads/ short range sam if set up in right areas will *censored* up rafale then.It's even lesser. 11 km last I heard in the lo profile.
View attachment 44546
View attachment 44548
You can see why this was an extremely advanced capability back in the 2000s.
Won’t this require changes in Spectra? Will this need to be done in France?
You asked to extend SPECTRA's functions to the low bands. For me, this concerns signal reception but also jamming.
Manpads/ short range sam if set up in right areas will *censored* up rafale then.
And both ukraine and Russia now have lots of experience in setting up a distributed network of manpads, short range mobile Sam systems.
It was also this dispersed air defense system that caused that lucky shot that brought down f117 over Yugoslavia.
Standard band in Rafale are 0.6 - 18 GHz high band to 40 GHz already done and to 300 Ghz to be completed. Low band I don't know but below 0.6 GHz...Possible, but low band could also mean 1-4 GHz rather than VHF.
Last I heard, standard F3+ came with C/X band and Ku band jammers (5-18 GHz). And IAF asked for low band, similar to SAP-14, so 1-4 GHz, L and S band.
This pod may handle 0.5 to 1/2 GHz.
It does not look like Rafale has anything to jam AWACS and ground-based search radars from standoff ranges, especially when they operate from depth areas with all that new fangled radar tech from extreme ranges.
Standard band in Rafale are 0.6 - 18 GHz high band to 40 GHz already done and to 300 Ghz to be completed. Low band I don't know but below 0.6 GHz...
People think that, but it's not so simple due to the very short range of such SAMs against low altitude targets. Take the Hammer for example, 70 km drops down to 11 km at low altitude. SRSAMs suffer from the same issue. The 100 Km MRSAM is also 10-15 km at low altitude.
And people have a wrong understanding of MANPADS. It's not as widespread as people think it is. And the jet's too fast for MANPADS. It's not a reliable ADS against a target that's going someplace else. It's meant to protect infantry from attacks on itself.
Wasn't so. The F-117 flew through the same route repeatedly. The Serbs pre-positioned SAMs along that route, where the F-117 had created some kinda of highway for itself. HUMINT informed SAM operators when the jet took off, and once detected, they fired dozens of missiles at it. The pilot dodged many but the SAM guys got lucky. Such tactics are absolutely unreliable 'cause the USAF acted like total dumba**es which led to this incident.
SPECTRA is not for jamming the direct signal, but the return signal.Possible. NGJ LB is 200 MHz to 2 GHz. So maybe IAF asked for below 0.6 GHz.
But how much power would that have relative to a standard pod? There are radars at 500-1000 km in China.
This is some good stuff from MBDA.The Hexalauncher presented by MBDA. A pod that can carry, within the space of a SCALP, six SmartGlider (gliding, 100km) or SmartCruiser (motorized, 200km) guided bombs. That is up to 18 weapons on Rafale.
This is basically French turbojet Shahed variant?MBDA's mass-produced One Way Effector looks like this:
Range: Approximately 500 km
Payload: Approximately 40 kg
Wingspan: Approximately 3 metres
Cruising speed: Approximately 400 km/h
Guidance: GPS
Propulsion: small turbojet engine
Launch from a ground ramp or vehicle (in salvo)
--> Project financed by MBDA's own funds
--> First demonstration flights expected in the autumn
--> Estimated production time of 18 months after signing a contract
--> Possible production of 1,000 effectors per month
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ukraine Shoot Down A Su-35S Using Stinger MANPAD
On 3 April 2022, a Su-35 combat aircraft was shot down near the settlement of Malaya Kamyshevakha near the Kharkiv region. Residents of the Kharkiv region have published photographs of a fighter of…www.globaldefensecorp.com
SPECTRA is not for jamming the direct signal, but the return signal.
Erm... Even stealth jets require standoff jammers. The Americans provide that with Compass Call. They are developing a similar podded one for the F-35 as well.
It's 'cause for certain frequencies (VHF/UHF) and high power requirements (standoff range), onboard systems are insufficient due to size and elecrical power constraints.
For example, VHF/UHF require antenna sizes of 1-10 m versus 3 cm for X band. You can't put quite a bit of that inside a fighter jet. And for high power, you need many antennas. Hence pods. Business jets and medium transports carry larger arrays for this purpose. The IAF is currently pursuing a program for this role, 5+2 EW jets based on A321.
This has nothing to do with self-protection. No clue why people tend to confuse self-protection with standoff jamming. There is nothing stealthy about the latter. The idea behind it is to protect the strike package that's using stealth for penetration.
6th gen jets are supposed to, in theory, remove the need for such a system, 'cause the airframe's designed for stealth in UHF/VHF too. That's where the B-21 and NGAD come in. All lesser jets, Rafale, F-22, F-35 etc, require this pod. The Israelis have developed the Scorpius SJ to support the F-35I.
Typhoon's dedicated EW variant is a very different system. It carries 2 Arexis escort jammers, not 1 standoff jammer. It's supposed to do what the Rafale does with its own inbuilt organic capabilities.
The Germans have a program called IuWES where an A-400M or equivalent will be converted into a standoff jammer like USAF's Compass Call and IAF's A321.
Airbus Lifts Lid on A400M Stand Off Jammer Variant - Journal of Electromagnetic Dominance
By Richard Scott Airbus Defence and Space GmbH (Manching, Germany) has unveiled a stand-off jammer (www.jedonline.com
The Hexalauncher presented by MBDA. A pod that can carry, within the space of a SCALP, six SmartGlider (gliding, 100km) or SmartCruiser (motorized, 200km) guided bombs. That is up to 18 weapons on Rafale.
The SCALP is stealthy, the hammer is low costAll that's luck.
The Russians have shown a lot of incompetence in operations due to lack of tech and insufficient training to use whatever tech they already have.
Fighter jets have the abilty to defeat MANPADS quite easily.
For self-protection, yes. But not for area protection. For example, what's protecting the SCALP or Hammer after it's been fired?
The idea being that Rafale would fly low, thereby avoiding the long-range threats. No need of a standoff jammer if no long-range radar can see you. This was the notion that they (and even you, as recently as last week at least) subscribed to.
It's a woefully misconcieved idea of course, because it wholly underestimates the networking behind a modern IADS, and as a result severely limits the kind of missions Rafale can do. Deep penetration going out the window for starters.
It's not a coincedence that this is being pursued alongside the new standoff ARM. The fact that these are capabilities that the Americans realized you need on a 4th/4.5 gen jet about 20-30 years ago just goes to show the kind of lowball approach that Dassault had taken with the Rafale program.
Typhoon's Praetorian already has equivalent capabilities to SPECTRA. The reason why they want an additional layer of EW capability on top of this is because they realize that internal SPJs are no longer sufficient to meet the threats that a non-VLO aircraft will face, especially when penetrating. You need more powerful solutions to deal with new-gen AAMs & SAMs with AESA seekers.
We already found this out the hard way. The jets with external ELL-8222s went entirely unscathed, despite having huge signatures & flying high...while Rafale's internal SPJ was overwhelmed.
Mark my words...the Rafale too will undergo a similar EW upgrade if it wants to survive. It would be straightforward to implement a podded 8222/Scorpius, but without deep integration with the Rafale's system it would hinder the radar & RWR. Again, this would require access to source codes (or a very expensive contract). We don't have this issue with MKI or Tejas.
Offboard standoff jamming with large platforms like this is a whole other ball game. They are waaaay more powerful...and waaaay less survivable.
TBf at this stage the Pakistani mirage 3/5 has superior strike capabilities than the rafale. They are using H2/H4 sows with 120km range. And have the ra'ad alcm for striking 650km. While we have to buy overpriced scalp and hammers which are short ranged and can't be produced in house. Also the saaw needs to be integrated on the rafale.It's even lesser. 11 km last I heard in the lo profile.
View attachment 44546
View attachment 44548
You can see why this was an extremely advanced capability back in the 2000s.
The SCALP is stealthy, the hammer is low cost