Brexit and Future of UK : Discussions

[randomradio]

That’s speculative - I personally don’t think Britain will recover. These chumps have taken the country down a cul de sac and it’s inevitable the public will be poorer.
Jacob Rees-Mogg Says It Could Take 50 Years To Reap The Benefits Of Brexit

I guess BMD is supporting Brexit for his children to pick up the pieces and his grandchildren to reap the benefits. BMD will make a good grandfather.

 

[Superkaif]

I guess BMD is supporting Brexit for his children to pick up the pieces and his grandchildren to reap the benefits. BMD will make a good grandfather.

His posts suggest he already is a grandad

 

[Superkaif]

@BMD

Brexit full legal advice published

Now we know the real reason why they didnt want to release it.......

 

[BMD]

@BMD

Brexit full legal advice published

Now we know the real reason why they didnt want to release it.......

Well I don't think we've learned anything new really. Before receiving this advice the deal was shit and it's still shit now.

 

[Superkaif]

Well I don't think we've learned anything new really. Before receiving this advice the deal was shit and it's still shit now.

The reason why she was hiding the advice - the Brits will be in limbo for decades. In my lifetime I can’t remember the government in office being so f***ed up.

 

[Guynextdoor]

Br

Brexiteers would rather kill the country than have any deal. Chronic hurt will occur if a hard deal or no deal - reminds me of the story of king Solomon and the baby .....Chapter 30: King Solomon

Brexiteers will lead UK to greatness. You should show more confidence in your country. Sally forth in this new adventure by firmly rejecting Europe and you will find what you're really made of.

 

[BMD]

It's better to try parting the waves than have the EU part your butt cheeks for eternity.

 

[BMD]

So the ECJ has ruled that the UK can reverse Brexit without agreement.

 

[Superkaif]

So the ECJ has ruled that the UK can reverse Brexit without agreement.

Congrats mate.

 

[randomradio]

Brexit: UK can unilaterally revoke article 50, says ECJ

The ECJ ruling opens up the possibility of a second Brexit vote, but I wonder who's going to be the sacrificial goat for pushing it forward.

 

[BMD]

A second referendum is complicated because there are effectively three options, deal, no deal or remain. But it's likely that people would find splitting the leave vote unacceptable. E.g. suppose the results were:

no deal - 30%
deal - 25%
remain - 45%

Is that a win for remain because 55% still voted to leave. And out of the leave votes no deal won.

So really you would needs two referendums with two choices in each but there is an argument that we've already voted to leave, so maybe the vote should be deal or no deal.

 

[Guynextdoor]

So the ECJ has ruled that the UK can reverse Brexit without agreement.

The ECJ is desparate to get UK back inside. You should understand this is because ECJ wants to UK money. This should be opposed at all costs.

 

[BMD]

Well the UK parliamentary vote has been delayed. Largely because the deal as it stands hasn't a cat's chance in hell.

 

[Guynextdoor]

Well the UK parliamentary vote has been delayed. Largely because the deal as it stands hasn't a cat's chance in hell.

So no deal Brexit?

 

[BMD]

So no deal Brexit?

Remains to be seen but the deal is unpassable with the backstop clause and would probably still struggle even without it. A loss margin in excess of 100 seats was anticipated so the vote was aborted faster than a rape baby.

 

[randomradio]

A second referendum is complicated because there are effectively three options, deal, no deal or remain. But it's likely that people would find splitting the leave vote unacceptable. E.g. suppose the results were:

no deal - 30%
deal - 25%
remain - 45%

Is that a win for remain because 55% still voted to leave. And out of the leave votes no deal won.

So really you would needs two referendums with two choices in each but there is an argument that we've already voted to leave, so maybe the vote should be deal or no deal.

There will only be two choices, leave or remain.

Deal or no deal will have to be done by political representatives in the Parliament, not the citizens.

Once the MPs are done voting, a new citizen's vote can be conducted for leave or remain after considering whether they like the deal or not.

 

[Guynextdoor]

Remains to be seen but the deal is unpassable with the backstop clause and would probably still struggle even without it. A loss margin in excess of 100 seats was anticipated so the vote was aborted faster than a rape baby.

I think you should just give up Ireland, the unpatriotic noobs have been supporting EU on the sly. Let them face the consequences. Then when they are begging you to take you back you can magnanimously let them in.

 

[BMD]

I think you should just give up Ireland, the unpatriotic noobs have been supporting EU on the sly. Let them face the consequences. Then when they are begging you to take you back you can magnanimously let them in.

I think ROI should join the UK. Now that the EU is making them pay on net there's no reason for them to stay in it. Most of their goods need to come through the UK anyway.

Meanwhile, Napoleon MkII has been defeated in France by people dressed as parking wardens, so things are looking down for the EU in general.

 

[BMD]

There will only be two choices, leave or remain.

Deal or no deal will have to be done by political representatives in the Parliament, not the citizens.

Once the MPs are done voting, a new citizen's vote can be conducted for leave or remain after considering whether they like the deal or not.

No, because that excludes the option of no deal.

 

[randomradio]

No, because that excludes the option of no deal.

The politicians are better equipped to handle that.

Or just have two separate votes. One for Brexit and the other for deal/no deal. But this is pointless.