Most of the equipment is so under-maintained it's effectively mothballed.German army is equipped. It's just a lack of support and maintenance.
It's faster to increase support than to wait years to receive hardware.
But for reasons that are nothing to do with carrier operations. My point is that you can't blow your trumpet about theoretical sinking a US carrier in a training exercise when your planes fall from the sky by themselves during peacetime.Facts are that 4 of the 5 rafale accidents occur on Marine model.
So Rafale "air" lost only 1 plane, on pilot (single...) error.
some days or weeks and it's OK.Most of the equipment is so under-maintained it's effectively mothballed.
No sea Rafale = no need of undergoing test of new weapons dedicated to carrier = 2 loss.But for reasons that are nothing to do with carrier operations. My point is that you can't blow your trumpet about theoretical sinking a US carrier in a training exercise when your planes fall from the sky by themselves during peacetime.
Perhaps if the HMI was designed better the pilots would have a lower workload, this was a factor observed during the Swiss eval.
be precise : where in the swiss eval ?Perhaps if the HMI was designed better the pilots would have a lower workload, this was a factor observed during the Swiss eval.
None of the accidents were anything to do with carrier operations. You're just strawmanning.No sea Rafale = no need of undergoing test of new weapons dedicated to carrier = 2 loss.
No sea Rafale = no refueling with a dedicated config for landing on carrier with low fuel = 1 loss.
No sea Rafale = probably no dog fight low over the sea (but just probably).
After that if you doubt of the fact a sea plane has a far more accident loss, You're wasting your breath.
***
During peacetime last version of Nimrod even don't quit the factory... You can thank french Atlantic 2 to watch for russian SSN when your deterrence subs quit or return from mission...
Yes but not pilot workload where the Typhoon scored full marks. Maybe overworked pilots crashed.be precise : where in the swiss eval ?
Rafale was 1st in quite all aspects, including the supposed strengh of the EF.
Some months after you get rid of the rats which have nested in them.some days or weeks and it's OK.
Some years to received after order a new equipment.
German army is equipped. It's just a lack of support and maintenance.
It's faster to increase support than to wait years to receive hardware.
Germany is under USA occupation. USSR left Germany after 1989 but USA stayed on even after that till today.Most of the equipment is so under-maintained it's effectively mothballed.
You're wrong. End of the discussion on this point.None of the accidents were anything to do with carrier operations. You're just strawmanning.
We have 7 SSNs for that. And SSBNs are the deterrence subs.
It's a WW2 history.....Some months after you get rid of the rats which have nested in them.
You're wrong on the two points.Germany is under USA occupation. USSR left Germany after 1989 but USA stayed on even after that till today.
Merkel is trying to get rid of USA by allying with Arabs by getting "refugees" into Germany and hence gain support against USA occupation towards independence. Until Germany is under USA occupation, there is no hopes of any military development.
Japan, Taiwan and South Korea are indeed under occupation. It is no joke. That is also the reason why USA has special rules regarding ToT for semiconductor technology to these countries. It is not by magic that Taiwan, Korea etc have 14nm lithography while the bigger countries like China has 28nm only. Japan is also listed as an enemy state in UN charter till date.You're wrong on the two points.
occupation ? so it's the case of Japan, S korea, a lot of european country, Qatar, Saudi arabia, GB, Italy..... First time I read that USA rules the world.
A mid-air collision and IFR has nothing to do with what platform you take off from.You're wrong. End of the discussion on this point.
7 SSN? Nice. They are so effective that Atlantic 2 (and probably Orion) came to assist RN.... They are so effective that GB ordered P8 poseidon....
Not sure the relevance of WWII, but there are probably more Spitfires, Hurricanes and gen 1 Typhoons that are combat ready than there are Luftwaffe fighters.It's a WW2 history.....
Now, I hope Wehrmacht understood of its error.
There are no US bases in Taiwan as of 1974. Yes the US share technology with allies but that's not to say China doesn't still copy a lot... an awful lot... hence why it's currently being shat on with tariffs.Japan, Taiwan and South Korea are indeed under occupation. It is no joke. That is also the reason why USA has special rules regarding ToT for semiconductor technology to these countries. It is not by magic that Taiwan, Korea etc have 14nm lithography while the bigger countries like China has 28nm only. Japan is also listed as an enemy state in UN charter till date.
In case of Arab countries, USA is based on accords for mutual interests. USA does favours around the world to spread islam and ensure dominance of GCC countries in Islam in return for petrodollars. The Afghanistan war, Albania creation etc are all a result of this alliance. So, the bases in GCC countries are based on consent of the rulers there.
The difference between USA in GCC countries and other countries is that the constitution of GCC countries is made by the people/ruler themselves whereas constitution of Germany, Japan, Taiwan, S.Korea were all made by USA influence and military dominance,