Brexit and Future of UK : Discussions

You may say that sarcastically, but the statistics support it.
 
You may say that sarcastically, but the statistics support it.

I ain't saying it sarcastically. I work for Fortune 50...you think I'll pass over becoming a farmer in the French country side? I'd prefer to milk cows and haul dung in France or Brazil any day. :(
 
Sorry...'Belgium' not 'Brazil'...

tmg-article_default_mobile;jpeg_quality=20.jpg
 
Roughly 22% of everything the EU subsidises is paid for by the UK.
 
The transition will be difficult but the end result will be better. For EU countries the transition will be hard and the end result will be worse. There is simply no way the EU can be better off without both UK money and UK consumers.
Sure. The EU are simply beggared and consequently buggered by Brexit. Britain was all along doing the EU a big favour by being part of it . And now Britain is going to be a land of milk and honey . Keep reminding yourself of that .
 
It's a simple fact, we were the second largest net contributor to the EU budget at 22% and consumed 16% of EU exports, and a far higher % for some countries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guynextdoor
They can demand for a new referendum at any time, but they can make one only after it's been approved by the British government; they're not allowed to unilaterally organize one. The first referendum had been authorized by the Cameron administration. A second referendum would have to be likewise authorized. Currently, the plan for Indyref 2 is to wait until after Brexit is over. Even then, it could take several years to get an agreement with the UK government, presuming they can get one, and then even more years before the referendum can be held.

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a free Scotland to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volcano
In any future referendum it will be pointed out that Alex Salmond (last SNP leader) is hosting a talk show on Russia Today.
 
What were Gerry Adams and McGuiness doing 30 years ago , McManus ?
Being very unsuccessful terrorists.

The difference now is that they let their guards down as a result of the Good Friday immunity agreement. If the Good Friday agreement breaks down, there is enough on them from their own interviews to put them in prison for life along with many of their compatriots. Other followers might also find that counter-terrorism technology has improved somewhat since the 1980s due to 'diversity'.
 
That's for the scotts to decide.
They already did only 4 years ago, more voted to remain in the UK than the EU. The idea that they're even solvent as an independent country is also laughable. Even Alex Salmond's inaccurately calculated economic plan relied on an oil price of $113/bbl.
 
The alternative is a brilliant future in the EU with a 10% budget deficit with 63% of their exports facing WTO tariffs and having to pay not only full interest but higher interest on their share of borrowing. By comparison, Brexit is an entirely risk free no-brainer.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Guynextdoor
Being very unsuccessful terrorists.

The difference now is that they let their guards down as a result of the Good Friday immunity agreement. If the Good Friday agreement breaks down, there is enough on them from their own interviews to put them in prison for life along with many of their compatriots. Other followers might also find that counter-terrorism technology has improved somewhat since the 1980s due to 'diversity'.


Well, compared to Islamic terrorists, Irish are more smarter.So you may find them hard to find.