Ah My Bad ! I didn't see the naval ranks on the shoulder! - mistook the army fatigues for the IANavy, every Branch has surface to surface launched brahmos
Ah My Bad ! I didn't see the naval ranks on the shoulder! - mistook the army fatigues for the IANavy, every Branch has surface to surface launched brahmos
He's DRDO maybe he doesn't know what Brahmos Aerospace is cooking. In anyways, we also need Rudram Mk2 and Mk3 as our strike weapons, which will be cheaper and faster than Brahmos NG. By 2030 we need to have Rudram Mk2 and Mk3 in production.
This dude is again saying development is yet to start for Brahmos-NG
| Feature | BrahMos Missile | AK-47 Bullet |
|---|---|---|
| Speed (m/s) | 950–1,020 m/s | ~715 m/s |
| Speed (km/h) | ~3,400–3,700 km/h | ~2,570 km/h |
| Faster by | ~33–42% faster | Slower |
| Flight profile | Guided, long-range | Ballistic, short-range |
| Purpose | Anti-ship/land strike | Infantry combat |





If we're already working on ET-LDHCM, then why scramjet brahmos?Classified if only
NG and LR in the medium term obviously plus the scramjet powered one in the longer term. Ramjet use can only push to like 800km since optimum mission time is of greater consideration to maintain high surprise element.
NG version to fit Brahmos into all available jets, from LCA to heavy class.
LR version primarily land/ship/sub launched dual use for a longer reach higher speed.
Would have liked higher payload myself but they seem to be ok with the existing 200kg warhead. Army fair few times told them to increase it to like 400kg or more but to no avail.
Different dimension fitment maybe. Brahmos is 600mm dia all along. The test vehicle of the HCM will likely use A5 booster stage. Actual missile will be quite large like the LRAShM like almost 1.5m dia booster with a slimmer CV on top hence 1500km or more range.If we're already working on ET-LDHCM, then why scramjet brahmos?
will it be significantly Cheaper?