Next, you dress up your ignorance and assumptions as facts contrary to evidence. You say Russia is incapable of mass producing complex missionary whereas history clearly proves otherwise, next you incorrectly assumed I compared F22 with Mig 15 which might be a honest mistake from all the cheese in your blood from those cheap Big Mac's. If F22 was such a great jet and something most american's consider as america's best ever jet, why did America fail to produce even 200 of them? Is it because Murica is literally too poor to produce them en masse? or maybe it's because it's an outdated and overpriced junk that america chose to cut their losses after making it? Either way, it looks very bad for Murica.
Also, since it's established the F22 is junk, let's move onto the F35, that's another overpriced piece of flying tin which failed at it's design goal, the fat piece of turd after murica's so called hype of 5th gen absolutely needing supercruise then failed to deliver on it and LM conveniently removing them from it's requirement, I'm not even gonna talk about how most 4th gen jet's would smoke it in wvr combat or it's poor availability rate or cash drowining maitenance cost against design requirements or the embarrassing fact that it's stealth which was its only good talking point got shot by literal pirates and 3rd generation military with poor air defence, after murica's constant loss against countries world wide, it's pretty well understood that Murica's only capable of invading unprepared 3rd world nations with primitive weapons, not any modern militaries.
And who you trying to be racist against you fat pig, historically it's well known Russia or previously the Soviet Union almost consistently made better weapons than murica, they lost a decade due to the fall of USSR, currently they are well on track, don't even compare that outdated trash f22 which murica doesnt even want with the best 5th gen of our time, The AL51 already blows the F119 out of the water, so no point comparing it, the F135 and AL51 both have similar thrust to weight ratio while Al51 is lighter, superior compressor and turbine efficiency, better fuel efficiency, better stealth and engine's alone doesn't compare the full story and means nothing until we compare both in action in their aircraft, the Su57 can take off much faster the f35 even with it's interim engine, the su57 can accelerate much faster and has greater max speed than f35, Su57 has much greater combat radius than F35, the f35 loses out in maneuverability against regular 4th gen jets, let alone a undisputed super maneuverable king of the sky which much greater thrust to weight ratio, superior control and more advanced control surfaces, superior aerodynamic body along with 3d thrust vectoring. There is no universe where you can compare that fat turd with the Su57 in performance metric.
