Possibly both. #PACelebrateDiversity. #FutureDaughterOfGafooraHasTwoMommiesAndNoDad .who, gaffoora or his wife?
Possibly both. #PACelebrateDiversity. #FutureDaughterOfGafooraHasTwoMommiesAndNoDad .who, gaffoora or his wife?
We are a farming nation. We celebrate our harvesting festivals very great joy.What's all this fuss about IAF action?
What's all this fuss about IAF action?
One thing I never understood about military coups in Pakistan is that they never seemed to make Pakistan prosperous and wealthy..
We are a farming nation. We celebrate our harvesting festivals very great joy.
True of West Pakistan. The then East Pakistan was mostly a colony and played an important part in fuelling the growth in West Pakistan.Pakistan prospered under Ayub Khan. They did extremely well during the 60s. Do you know the S Koreans copied a lot of Pakistan's economic policies that happened under Ayub Khan? Of course, at the time they got a lot of free money and investment from the West also. At that time, India and Pakistan were exact opposites. Pakistan was a champion of privatisation in South Asia, while India chose socialism.
But after the 1971 war, Pakistan went downhill. Bhutto started nationalisation, which murdered Pak industry. And after Zia came to power, Pak began massive Islamisation. So they brought in Sharia law, segregated men and women, oppressed minorities etc. In the end education took a back seat for the populace, which is why it's declining even today. And of course, nobody in the world cares about Pakistani products, so no exports either.
Basically, had Pakistan followed through with Ayub Khan's policies, Pakistan would have become a developed country alongside Japan, S Korea etc.
Pakistan excels at making brilliant plans and then pissing on the execution. They had EVERYTHING a nation could want (natural gas deposits, coal deposits, a bread basket region with a highly developed irrigation network, a busy port on the important Gulf route, good tourism potential and support from the west). What did they do with it?Pakistan prospered under Ayub Khan. They did extremely well during the 60s. Do you know the S Koreans copied a lot of Pakistan's economic policies that happened under Ayub Khan? Of course, at the time they got a lot of free money and investment from the West also. At that time, India and Pakistan were exact opposites. Pakistan was a champion of privatisation in South Asia, while India chose socialism.
But after the 1971 war, Pakistan went downhill. Bhutto started nationalisation, which murdered Pak industry. And after Zia came to power, Pak began massive Islamisation. So they brought in Sharia law, segregated men and women, oppressed minorities etc. In the end education took a back seat for the populace, which is why it's declining even today. And of course, nobody in the world cares about Pakistani products, so no exports either.
Basically, had Pakistan followed through with Ayub Khan's policies, Pakistan would have become a developed country alongside Japan, S Korea etc.
Basically, had Pakistan followed through with Ayub Khan's policies, Pakistan would have become a developed country alongside Japan, S Korea etc.
...In the end education took a back seat for the populace, which is why it's declining even today....
True of West Pakistan. The then East Pakistan was mostly a colony and played an important part in fuelling the growth in West Pakistan.
Babajeee has just tweeted....'Calm #before storm'
nothing
Off course it's not Apr 16 yet and we are not good at preponing dates. If they say 16-20, add Indian coefficient of delay by 8 days. My estimate is 26 April.
Post Balakot they have declared 3 casualties...... This plays well for us... 0 casualties for PA... and we have regular casualties.... The aggressor is Pakistan.....Indian Army destroyed a mortar position of enemy in Goi sector of PoK around 2:30 PM today afternoon. More than 5 Casualities expected to enemy.
They will do some false flag terror operation on themselves between these days. Then claim/cry victim while blaming India for the terror attack.