My biggest issue is the ability to churn out more interceptors. I know that Akash is supposed to have a pretty high percentage of local components, but I do not know how many India has in their stockpile. I've seen estimates from 1200 to over 20,000 interceptors with between 30-250 launchers. It's role for BMD defense is murky.
Akash: Officially, the IAF has 120 launchers and the IA will soon have 96 launchers. So that's 648 ready to fire. Numbers beyond that could be anything.
MRSAM: The IAF will have 54 launchers and IA will likely have 45 launchers. So that's 792 missiles.
Akash NG: The IAF will have 56 launchers with 336 missiles. The estimated numbers expected to be bought are 7 squadrons. Orders could go beyond that.
Then there's S-400 which will climb up to 80 launchers. Missile numbers depends on the type. Some more will be bought.
SPYDER does not have a BMD function. But we have 108 launchers with 648 missiles.
None of these include reserves.
Numbers of PAD / PDV / AD-1/ AD-2 are obviously classified but going by US production rates of THAAD + SM3 production (around 150-180 interceptors per year), I'd be surprised if India could scale up production faster than the Pakistanis can get their hands on BMs.
Unlike American missiles, ours are much cheaper.
We are not under threat from BMs with long range. Most of what Pak can muster will be SRBMs in the 300-800 km class. Our existing IADS can handle BMs of this class.
This deficiency is supposed to be addressed with a combination of Kusha + BMD programme for long range, Akash NG for intermediate and VLSRSAM for close in range, right? This layering of is much more comfortable since it is all local and is what I mean by IADs being number one priority. I feel that India needs to be bristling with AD
Definitely.