If you remove the deputations, RAW is a IPS led cadre.DIA is better than RAW? RAWs technical capabilities are pretty formidable.
And in any scenario, if it's between an IPS or Lt., i would always choose the Lt.
If you remove the deputations, RAW is a IPS led cadre.DIA is better than RAW? RAWs technical capabilities are pretty formidable.
It's only the Chinese know what are the doing, do they still believe in economic power & diplomacy will give them edge over USA i don't know, in the longer run for sure, but economic power needs muscle power which the USA has been continuously showing it,They did nothing when Iran was being bombed. And they're doing nothing while the US is taking away their Venezuelan oil.
And I bet they will continue to do nothing when US finishes its regime change in Iran and cuts off their Iranian oil too.
What happened to the 25yr agreement with Iran? They have always been a paper tiger.
One thing that is certain is that there's nothing for people of Venezuela,The White House has told companies they must rebuild Venezuela's crude-pumping infrastructure if they want compensation for assets seized by Caracas.
By Ben Lefebvre, Zack Colman and James Bikales01/03/2026 02:35 PM EST
American oil companies have long hoped to recover the assets that Venezuela’s authoritarian regime ripped from them decades ago.
Now the Trump administration is offering to help them achieve that aim — with one major condition.
Administration officials have told oil executives in recent weeks that if they want compensation for their rigs, pipelines and other seized property, then they must be prepared to go back into Venezuela now and invest heavily in reviving its shattered petroleum industry, two people familiar with the administration’s outreach told POLITICO on Saturday. The outlook for Venezuela’s shattered oil infrastructure is one of the major questions following the U.S. military action that captured leader Nicolás Maduro.
But people in the industry said the administration’s message has left them still leery about the difficulty of rebuilding decayed oil fields in a country where it’s not even clear who will lead the country for the foreseeable future.
“They’re saying, ‘you gotta go in if you want to play and get reimbursed,’” said one industry official familiar with the conversations.
The offer has been on the table for the last 10 days, the person said. “But the infrastructure currently there is so dilapidated that no one at these companies can adequately assess what is needed to make it operable.”
President Donald Trump suggested in a televised address Saturday morning that he fully expects U.S. oil companies to pour big money into Venezuela.
“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure and start making money for the country,” Trump said as he celebrated Maduro’s capture.
It’s been five decades since the Venezuelan government first nationalized the oil industry and nearly 20 years since former President Hugo Chávez expanded the asset seizures. The country has some of the largest oil reserves in the world, but its petroleum infrastructure has decayed amid years of mismanagement and meager investment.
Initial thoughts among U.S. oil industry officials and market analysts who spoke to POLITICO regarding a post-Maduro Venezuela focused more on questions than answers.
The administration has so far not laid out what its long-term plan looks like, or even if it has one, said Bob McNally, a former national security and energy adviser to President George W. Bush who now leads the energy and geopolitics consulting firm Rapidan Energy Group.
“It’s not clear there’s been a specific plan beyond the principal decision that in a post-Maduro, Trump-compliant regime that the U.S. companies — energy and others — will be at the top of the list” to reenter the country, McNally said. He added: “What the regime looks like, what the plans are for getting there, that has not been fully fleshed out yet.”
A central concern for U.S. industry executives is whether the administration can guarantee the safety of the employees and equipment that companies would need to send to Venezuela, how the companies would be paid, whether oil prices will rise enough to make Venezuelan crude profitable and the status of Venezuela’s membership in the OPEC oil exporters cartel. U.S. benchmark oil prices were at $57 a barrel, the lowest since the end of the pandemic, as of the market’s close on Friday.
The White House did not immediately reply to questions about its plan for the oil industry, but Trump said during Saturday’s appearance at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida that he expected oil companies to put up the initial investments.
“We’re going to rebuild the oil infrastructure, which requires billions of dollars that will be paid for by the oil companies directly,” Trump said. “They will be reimbursed for what they’re doing, but it’s going to be paid, and we’re going to get the oil flowing.”
However, the administration’s outreach to U.S. oil company executives remains “at its best in the infancy stage,” said one industry executive familiar with the discussions, who was granted anonymity to describe conversations with the president’s team.
“In preparation for regime change, there had been engagement. But it’s been sporadic and relatively flatly received by the industry,” this person said. “It feels very much a shoot-ready-aim exercise.”
Venezuela’s oil output has fallen to less than a third of the 3.5 million barrels per day that it produced in the 1970s, and the infrastructure that is used to tap into its 300 billion barrels of reserves has deteriorated in the past two decades.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
All spent on Ukraine reimbursed.
I see, well RAW has had its failures but it has had its successes. IB is also IPS led and successfully fooled the CIA and its $1 billion Lacrosse satellites during Pokhran 2, and RAW did sever a part of Pakistan in 1971. So can we make over arching assumptions that RAW is inferior to DIA solely because it's run by IPS people? What of the special capabilities RAW has built over decades whether it be ARC, RRC etc which have played crucial roles in intelligence gathering? DIA does not have such specialized technical intelligence gathering capability afaik or experience using them. Nor does DIA have the decades of experience RAW (and even IB) has in covert ops, which it has demonstrated as far as Fiji and Canada (infact during the 1980s and 1990s according to the book RAW by Yaatish Yadav, the IPS dominated IB was the one leading intelligence ops against Khalistanis even in Canada).If you remove the deputations, RAW is a IPS led cadre.
And in any scenario, if it's between an IPS or Lt., i would always choose the Lt.
Anyone can make a bomb. Making it deliverable is another issue. From bomb to miniaturization for delivery by missile takes well over 1 year likely even more for a country like Iran, within which they will get royally screwed.The funniest thing would be if iran somehow get's nuke by hook or crook, or someone passes it to them,
The entire middle East Will be in chaos and the entire USA plan will start to crumble,
That would be some event to see
We have covert special ops who have engaged already in many operations many of which we will never know about (one of which was the extraction of a politician from Bangladesh during the 1980s who later proved to be a huge help to us). We have the intelligence capabilities for covert action the problem is what of the will to use them. Now we have the political support and the will.We need to atleast drastically expand our air force and invest heavily in our spec ops units and develop tier 1, tier 2 spec ops units along with a spetsnaz like para brigade along with a psychological warfare unit to achieve even half of what the Americans achieved.
I see, well RAW has had its failures but it has had its successes. IB is also IPS led and successfully fooled the CIA and its $1 billion Lacrosse satellites during Pokhran 2, and RAW did sever a part of Pakistan in 1971. So can we make over arching assumptions that RAW is inferior to DIA solely because it's run by IPS people? What of the special capabilities RAW has built over decades whether it be ARC, RRC etc which have played crucial roles in intelligence gathering? DIA does not have such specialized technical intelligence gathering capability afaik or experience using them. Nor does DIA have the decades of experience RAW (and even IB) has in covert ops, which it has demonstrated as far as Fiji and Canada (infact during the 1980s and 1990s according to the book RAW by Yaatish Yadav, the IPS dominated IB was the one leading intelligence ops against Khalistanis even in Canada).
Intelligence failures are catastrophic and even the best of the best like CIA (9/11) and Mossad (October 7th) have had to face such catastrophic events. So is it fair to judge RAW simply because it's run by IPS people? Perhaps according to your logic we need to disband NIA, IB also and make military handle internal intelligence as well!
Now let's wait and see how many virtuous countries will condemn this aggression based on principles.
Rules based international order took a break today.
now it will be more urgent for them to test a bomb or accept a take over.The funniest thing would be if iran somehow get's nuke by hook or crook, or someone passes it to them,
The entire middle East Will be in chaos and the entire USA plan will start to crumble,
That would be some event to see
Not necessary, there is some thing called dirty bomb. Nuke is all about threat and the damage it may cause, that is the deterrent.Anyone can make a bomb. Making it deliverable is another issue. From bomb to miniaturization for delivery by missile takes well over 1 year likely even more for a country like Iran, within which they will get royally screwed.
The USS Ford CBG was parked in the Caribbean for months to pressurize the Maduro govt into surrendering.This was a deal brokered handover. Maduro was holed in a fortified complex when the party started.
His key people were cultivated over the last few months into selling him out. The choice was a standoff which would ruin the country’s infra and flatten their armed forces or a deal that let them walk away with cash.
Its a thick high API oil reserves. Nobody wants that oil.Given the oil resources it's important to bring some democracy to this land.
Its a thick high API oil reserves. Nobody wants that oil.
I'm curious how long this democracy will last. They tried doing that in Iran back in the days for it to devolve into what we see today. I'm curious how USA would prevent another Chavez like figure from risingGiven the oil resources it's important to bring some democracy to this land.
