It is very hard not to get arrested in Russia these days:
Raj is not going to be too happy about this.@randomradio, @Innominate, @Picdelamirand-oil, @RASALGHUL
SAM-SLAM summer series continues. I think the S-400 is just designed to look scary and nothing more, sort of a scarecrow for aircraft.
The strike was carried out using 5 ATACMS ballistic missiles.
Losses:
• 2 S-300/400 air defense missile launchers were destroyed;
• 1 S-300/400 air defense missile launcher was damaged;
• Radar “96L6E” was destroyed;
• The control center of the S-300/400 air defense system was destroyed;
Lost count. Wait until they develop an air-launched ATACMS.Raj is not going to be too happy about this.
How many batteries past two months alone now?
The worst part is that they only fired 5 ATACMS and it took out a site that had at least 3 launchers (12 missiles).
Anyone who bought S-400s got conned, they should pick upgrade to some old PAC-1s or early PAC-2s or something.
@randomradio, @Rajput Lion, @RASALGHUL
LIE!!! Everyone knows s500 radar is meant for BM so this dude is wrong AND a liar.Interesting little bit of info. The radar was actually a 96L6-TsP, which some S-400s now use. It is associated with the new S-500.
![]()
Russia's S-500 Defense System Is Ready To Launch. Is It the Ultimate F-35 Killer?
What about S-500 makes it so fearsome for stealth fighter jets?interestingengineering.com
Alleged 3,500km detection range.
??? I think Russia has had more than 22.I saw a table in the Ukrainian press showing the number of deaths by foreign country since the start of the war:
- US: 56
- Georgia: 55
- Belarus: 39
- Colombia: 38
- France: 23
- United Kingdom: 22
- Russia: 22

@randomradio, @Rajput Lion, @RASALGHUL, @Picdelamirand-oilLIE!!! Everyone knows s500 radar is meant for BM so this dude is wrong AND a liar.
Great drone footage and ATACMs worked just like the 80's promo video.
22 fighting for Ukraine??? I think Russia has had more than 22.![]()
@randomradio, @Innominate, @Picdelamirand-oil, @RASALGHUL
SAM-SLAM summer series continues. I think the S-400 is just designed to look scary and nothing more, sort of a scarecrow for aircraft.
The strike was carried out using 5 ATACMS ballistic missiles.
Losses:
• 2 S-300/400 air defense missile launchers were destroyed;
• 1 S-300/400 air defense missile launcher was damaged;
• Radar “96L6E” was destroyed;
• The control center of the S-300/400 air defense system was destroyed;
It could also be that all their trained operators are dead, which is also a serious issue.If S400 is unable to reliably shoot down even legacy systems like ATACMS (which don't even do anything special like skip-glide/quasi-ballistic maneuvers etc.) that's a serious issue.
I think the problem is mostly on the sensor side. Russians have struggled to develop modern AESAs to fire control their missiles.