So he's going to continue doing what he was doing anyway. Come on, it's not like the DPRK pulled all those new missiles out of their backside.Arming NoKo and Iran is a given. Pointed this out right in the beginning. Cuba could get modern weapons too. Even Venezuela.
A picture of Russia would be 'everything occupied'. In fact, given that China is under a Communist dictatorship derived from USSR support, mainland China is entirely occupied too.
New Ukr drone attack in Crimea, Yevpatoriya DSA base, where S400s are believed to be located.
russians blindly followed the western technology denial regime and now they are paying the price for it. If they had given tech to other cntries they could have not just imported from them now but would have also kept west on its toes. They dint export all those jets/missiles to iran,libya ,iraq under western pressure , west picked them of one by one and emboldened them to attack russia directly now.
But the target wasn't S-400s, it was a naval base. The target was a dry dock. You could get that off google maps.
It was the S-400s jobs to protect the naval base.
I don't know what NATO ISAR has to do with that.
So he's going to continue doing what he was doing anyway. Come on, it's not like the DPRK pulled all those new missiles out of their backside.
The EU's economy is >5x the size of India's and it buys only marginally more, and only thanks to Hungary mainly.Point being all that money still led to funding Russia's war, even if there was intention to reduce spending. Regardless, the EU still buys more than India.
Buddy, Russia's SAMs aren't doing so great, their fighter jets even worse still, and their armour is basically scrap waiting to happen. And that's against Ukraine not NATO.Nope. While the NoKo received help initially, they started developing such systems on their own without external assistance, they even transferred that to Pakistan and Iran. But the real threat is the supply of conventional weapons. The US isn't scared of a few atomic bombs, but they definitely don't want countries like NoKo and Iran getting advanced next gen weapons like SAMs, fighter jets and armor.
The path to the dock, the state of the radar systems, the downtime the SAM would experience due to deployment rotation, maintenance or shift rotation, use of recognized signals that they have countermeasures for. Any number of reasons could lower the effectiveness of a SAM, and transparency could tell you when a SAM is at its weakest for exploitation.
We're talking about no SAM being perfect(Patriot had 6/6 Kinzhal missile interceptions), well duh, but this is a very low tech airforce. They basically at most sequenced some drones, SEAD missiles, old S-200 missiles and Storm Shadows.
You could believe it's ISR, but the S-400 also failed at point/base defense. Sunk ships in part attest to that.
The logical conclusion is the S-400 and Russian stuff doesn't work really well. They're good, but it's not anything ground breaking.
I guess we can revisit this conversation after ATACMS arrives in Ukraine. But, the S-400 against Storm Shadow, has failed.
I would comfortably put the Patriot and SAMP-T over the S-400.
The EU's economy is >5x the size of India's and it buys only marginally more, and only thanks to Hungary mainly.
Buddy, Russia's SAMs aren't doing so great, their fighter jets even worse still, and their armour is basically scrap waiting to happen. And that's against Ukraine not NATO.
And yes, they already helped DPRK.
![]()
North Korea ICBM success
How has North Korea managed to make such astounding progress with its long-range missile programme over the last two years? Here, Michael Elleman shares the first solid evidence that North Korea has acquired a high-performance liquid-propellant engine from illicit networks in Russia and Ukraine.www.iiss.org
The Patriot is a sad joke.We're talking about no SAM being perfect(Patriot had 6/6 Kinzhal missile interceptions), well duh, but this is a very low tech airforce. They basically at most sequenced some drones, SEAD missiles, old S-200 missiles and Storm Shadows.
You could believe it's ISR, but the S-400 also failed at point/base defense. Sunk ships in part attest to that.
The logical conclusion is the S-400 and Russian stuff doesn't work really well. They're good, but it's not anything ground breaking.
I guess we can revisit this conversation after ATACMS arrives in Ukraine. But, the S-400 against Storm Shadow, has failed.
I would comfortably put the Patriot and SAMP-T over the S-400.