What kind of person in 40s wastes so much time, energy to write abusive paragraphs on foreign forums against anonymous people for no reason even when spoken to nicely?
Your knowledge base is a tragedy. You’re just pulling stuff out of your *censored* and patching up your arguments with ad-hoc Google searches.
5th time let me ask you - what should we use instead of Google?
Watching you secretly move the goalposts with those numbers is straight-up comedy.
What's secret here on casual chat forum? This is the real comedy.
hops from X-band to visible light to L-band?
This is your exaggerated addition. Real comedy.
Sorry,
but physical dimensions are an absolute reality. Gimmicks like geometric shaping or Just swapping out a few materials here and there, and pulling off some cheap tricks with specialized coatings.. to deceive radar have hard limits.
The 'RCS' everyone defaults to is just a basic equivalent baseline calibrated for X-band radars of that era.
Same "Gimmicks" used by Russia, China & others too.
While it's true that it's very difficult to calibrate a jet's body for every band, that could be physical limit, but the geometry, RAS, RAM, EW, RF blocker, etc try to address as many bands as possible, bcoz different bands are used by AAMs, SAMs, Fighters, AWACS, etc.
At the end of the day, it's just an aircraft. We are talking about technology that was first put into practice forty years ago, and hardware that entered active service two or three decades back. It's not a Gundam, it's not some black tech from Cybertron, and it's certainly not magic
Put it under S-band or L-band, and physics takes over: bigger size equals bigger reflection. Period.
Your narrow perspective is just using a new lie to cover up the last one, exposing your pure ignorance.
I’m hilarious that a foot-spa worker from Zimbabwe has a firmer grip on science than you, a self-proclaimed 'IP engineer.'
Check your privilege.
All the garbage noise you fed me for two days evaporated into a joke the split second actual physics entered the chat. Fifteen years ago, understanding this was a middle-school entry requirement for any military board.
If you had even a shred of high school math education, you would know just how steep a quadratic curve is, and exactly where the coordinate X=1.0 sits in that system. To make it worse, this is actually a quartic function (a 4th-degree function), which means it’s exponentially steeper than a quadratic one. What kind of meaningful return do you honestly think you're getting once you drop below 1.0?
- You're treating 0.0001 m2 RCS as Magic, Gundam, Cybertron tech.
- Well, it's not hilarious but pity that a person with firm grip on science ended up as foot-spa worker in Zimbabwe or anywhere, hence venting his anger & frustration on random anonymous people for no reason even when spoken to nicely.
- Unfortunately we all have to be anonymous otherwise ADHD guys would attack personal & professional profile,perhaps of family members too.
Now you claim a missile pylon has an RCS of 0.1 or 1 square meter? You're just making it up as you go.
Explain this to me: how does something with a frontal projection smaller than 0.1 square meters end up with an RCS larger than its physical size? Did the pylon magically turn into a Luneburg lens?
- Physical area & measured RCS can be different depending upon wavelength/band.
- I could be wrong but i'm trying my best. You can't expect non-aero people to start giving Phd level stuff or join aero-university for casula chat.
- I can also say that you're claiming based on your non-google sources like that Chinese article screenshot on Su-33UB & you don't tell what sites we should use.
- The usage of Luneburg lens itself proves how critical all stealth aspects are. Every nation can't create best RAM, RAS, EW.
- Unstealthy Pylons have bent/curved surfaces, discontinuities, gaps, bumps, which amplify the RCS & different bands give different #.
- RF reflection, diffraction & scattering are of multiple types.
- When the size of the object is much larger than the radar's wavelength, maximum backscattering RCS = 4.pi.Area^2/wavelength^2
If area =1 m2, because the physical area A is squared in the numerator, any wavelength shorter than sqrt(4.pi) = 3.54m will result in an RCS greater than 1 m2.
X band wavelength 2.5-3.75 cms, Ku band 1.6-2.5 cms, C band 5-7.5 cms, the pylon is certainly bigger & its not just flat but bent, curved, bumped, amplifying the RCS.
Watching you pull these imaginary, cross-disciplinary theories out of thin air every single day is honestly enough to make anyone burst out laughing
Honestly, I only know the 26 letters of the alphabet, so whatever gibberish you're writing is completely beyond me.
These theories are pulled out of internet search. That's all non-aero members can do. Unfortunately you're not disciplined in any way, hence these things go beyond you, hence you can't do proactive search & you burst into laughing.
You can ignore everything here, but all the makers are paying attention to all aspects of stealth which you call gimmick, trash, cheap tricks, lies, fantasies, magic, Gundam, Cybertron tech.
If you're Chinese then still you call Chinese jets trash.
If you're from Zimbabwe then obviously it doesn't matter to you. Then why wasting time & energy on Indian forum & actually not giving any data?
