Operation Sindoor: India Strikes Terroist Camps Inside Pakitsan
- Thread starter Defc0n
- Start date
- Status
IAF starts something, DRDO screams no, IAF is forced to end. Same old story.
The Americans have the "Angry Kitten" pod for it though. With a potential plan to buy some more C-130s, this could become an addition. Since our C-130Js are meant for SF role, it needs EW.
pakiee account
Why would he have anything good to say about MRFA? He doesn't want any direct competitor to HAL, it has nothing to do with the good of the country.
He has already mentioned that apart from HAL the IAF needs a new vendor for a new production line could be TATA, L&T or any other private firm. Says, testing facility requires a lot of funding, just 1000 crores for one, they require multiple.
HAL itself is a subcontractor of Airbus and Boeing and also SAFRAN who are its competitors.
Bro gave himself Pat in the back for imaginary interception all for feel good moment ( sab changa C ) ..... Aand forces intercepted 10 time more Brahmos than what India fired in first place 
Brahmos has indeed put Pakistan in a dilemma. A slick commercial to market it well is definitely due to be honest.Bro gave himself Pat in the back for imaginary interception all for feel good moment ( sab changa C ) ..... Aand forces intercepted 10 time more Brahmos than what India fired in first place
View attachment 43993
View attachment 43994
The best one that I have read so far has been from RUSI. Balanced language resulting in a less agenda driven or a divisive take. Most intl. folks would find it palatable.
Calibrated Force: Operation Sindoor and the Future of Indian Deterrence
Gen Raj Shukla said something very important in a recent interview - India cannot stop others from talking about potential aircraft losses. So what we have to do to regain control over the narrative is to own the losses. So that's what CDS did with his high profile interviews.
There may be more to it, but at a minimum this is what CDS did: he robbed Pakistan of their prime reason of declaring this as their victory.
HIs message is simple: yes there were losses because of tactical errors, but we learned from them and applied our learnings with great success on May 9/10
If the losses were from tactical errors that were later rectified, they were NOT because of:
a/ superior Chinese weapons (denies space to China shills)
b/superior Pakistani tactics that would indicate that they can dominate IAF (denies space to Field Marshal)
c/ inferiority/lack of resources on IAF side (denies salesmen of foreign weapon systems)
There may be more to it, but at a minimum this is what CDS did: he robbed Pakistan of their prime reason of declaring this as their victory.
HIs message is simple: yes there were losses because of tactical errors, but we learned from them and applied our learnings with great success on May 9/10
If the losses were from tactical errors that were later rectified, they were NOT because of:
a/ superior Chinese weapons (denies space to China shills)
b/superior Pakistani tactics that would indicate that they can dominate IAF (denies space to Field Marshal)
c/ inferiority/lack of resources on IAF side (denies salesmen of foreign weapon systems)
This should not have come at Singapore in front of Bloomberg. It should have been a part of IAF debrief. Also, we should end this drama of "Op Sindoor is still on". End the operation and keep the prepration on OR let India execute it fully. All this "hot on" is really very poor choice.
Precision, Perfection and Accuracy have been Hallmarks of IAF Golden Strikes in Pakistan: Targets Obliterated from the Face of Earth
Pakistan's efforts at safeguarding their assets by hiding them in HDBTs have failed miserably, and the ingenuity of IAF in striking these
capsindia.org
Perhaps due to some reasons the artillery drills were not being done regularly. This is a training issue. Under live fire only the drill will keep things smooth.
- Status