French and international media need to relax; the contract is at least a year away.
Don't fall for the "Chinese are 10ft" story, PPP is what matters not nominal:
- According to the IMF’s October 2025 World Economic Outlook, China’s GDP is $41.02 trillion in 2025, versus $17.71 trillion for India. So little over 2x compared to 5x
- Historical World Bank data show China’s GDP was about ~$17T in 2014. So ~10yrs ahead, not 50
- Current economic outlook out of China is they're in a possible recession. Certainly everyone agrees their 5% growth story is all bunkum.
Doesn't mean India doesn't have it's work cut out. But economic forecast before all these FTAs already pegged India at 7% plus growth for the next 2-3 decades. All these FTAs will only provide tailwinds and increase the momentum.
theprint.in
And I thought this was to create integration capabilities in private sectorIt is learnt that the final assembly line for the Rafales will be set up at the Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited’s (DRAL’s) Nagpur facility, which is now a subsidiary of Dassault Aviation that manufactures the fighter.

Do you guys now get why India is so vital to the French defence ecosystem ? This is called forward thinking. Le Francais are thinking 2 decades ahead.And I thought this was to create integration capabilities in private sector
So Dassault is transferring it's capabilities to well, Dassault. View attachment 49912
half of them might be f5, wait for the proposal to get submittedSignature March 2027 , with first off the shelf delivery in 2030..
Why not go for F5 entirely.
They will waste even more time, you are seriously underestimating Them,Signature March 2027 , with first off the shelf delivery in 2030..
Why not go for F5 entirely.
Maybe in Future Dassault will shift Itself fully to Dassault(Nagpur).Do you guys now get why India is so vital to the French defence ecosystem ? This is called forward thinking. Le Francais are thinking 2 decades ahead.
By then France would likely be overwhelmed by its social contract vide pensions to the retired , debt obligations , falling TFR , declining productivity & so on.
They need a trustworthy , financially secure willing to put up big money , with a decent industrial base & politically stable partner to execute their plans thru mfg at scale at economic rates inconceivable in France whereas France retains design control & IPR .
In short a variation of the west's plan of shifting non strategic industry to China concentrating mfg there.
Our dhotis & babooodumb can't think beyond 3 months whereas our defence establishment are enamored by anything & everything foreign especially if it happens to be from the west.
However this presents an opportunity provided we get our act together & take a leaf out of China's playbook.

The Design & Development will obviously stay in France as will the mfg of core parts. Anything & everything not deemed part of the core system will be mfgd in India.Maybe in Future Dassault will shift Itself fully to Dassault(Nagpur).
![]()

The 1 year timeframe is for negotiations to be concluded & for the agreement to be inked.Well, Dassault has two months to submit a complete proposal with 50% local content (which requires negotiations with local industry), and then India has one year to set up a cost negotiation committee.
It would never occur to them to set up the committee while Dassault is preparing its proposal...
paying this much for only 50% non core indigenous content and delivery at 2030 seems like robbery at this point.Well, Dassault has two months to submit a complete proposal with 50% local content (which requires negotiations with local industry), and then India has one year to set up a cost negotiation committee.
It would never occur to them to set up the committee while Dassault is preparing its proposal...
It wasn't us who asked, it was you: you were determined not to ask for Rafale anymore because they were too expensive, and you organized the MRFA, which was initially for single-engine aircraft, so that you could be sure you wouldn't take the Rafale again, and now you're asking for them again. There must be a reason, right?paying this much for only 50% non core indigenous content and delivery at 2030 seems like robbery at this point.
MRFA did not exclusively pick single-engine aircrafts. There were other contenders as well. The IAF-GoI ended up picking the Rafale.It wasn't us who asked, it was you: you were determined not to ask for Rafale anymore because they were too expensive, and you organized the MRFA, which was initially for single-engine aircraft, so that you could be sure you wouldn't take the Rafale again, and now you're asking for them again. There must be a reason, right?
We did not deem it necessary to pick up pace with reforms and put money into our domestic setup. The cost, which is staggering, is the cost of not only acquiring the aircrafts but also of bringing DA to India to setup shop here. The only other contender that could have been partnered with and negotiated with (post 2021) was SAAB. They do not offer the same level of partnership (in terms of scale and SCN development) as DA and its other partners like THALES etc. Whatever the reason(s), this is option that IAF-GoI selected.paying this much for only 50% non core indigenous content and delivery at 2030 seems like robbery at this point.
MRFA did not exclusively pick single-engine aircrafts. There were other contenders as well. The IAF-GoI ended up picking the Rafale.
The Indian government issued an RFI (Request for Information for 114 MRFA in 2018. As many as eight aircraft responded to the RFI. These include the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, Boeing F-15EX Eagle II, Lockheed Martin F-21 (a variant of F-16V with 14 India-specific customizations), Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Saab JAS-39 Gripen E/F, Mikoyan MiG-35, and Sukhoi Su-35.
We learned that the government of India has decided not to limit the tender for the air force to only single engine fighter, and so we end up again with a MMRCA style competition.
I chose an article that announces this government decision to initialize this topic.
Indian Air Force wants fighter jet deal worth Rs 1.25L cr to be fast-tracked
Aginst the backdrop of dwindling fighter squadrons, the Indian Air Force (IAF) feels that its requirement for more than 100 combat aircraft expected to be worth over Rs 1.25 lakh crore should be procured through a government-to-government (G2G) deal to avoid further time delays due to the complex acquisition process involved in it.
The IAF wants the inter-governmental deal as the Defence ministry is of the view that it should not proceed with the single-engine fighter aircraft programme, and initiate a global programme where all fighter aircraft manufacturers would be invited through a competitive tender and the winner would be chosen after extensive trials.
Monsieur, I am talking about the actual RFI notification that started the selection and not the scraping of the original intentions or thoughts. These present supposed intentions/course of the IAF which were later amended. The passages/sentences below are more of a intention/desire/feeling or a thought layout. If there is a version of the tender, consisting of a RFI, that targeted single-engine FAs only then I stand corrected.We learned that the government of India has decided not to limit the tender for the air force to only single engine fighter, and so we end up again with a MMRCA style competition.
I chose an article that announces this government decision to initialize this topic.
Indian Air Force wants fighter jet deal worth Rs 1.25L cr to be fast-tracked
![]()
Aginst the backdrop of dwindling fighter squadrons, the Indian Air Force (IAF) feels that its requirement for more than 100...