excuse me - who gave you the authority to call someone primitive or advanced? is it based on science? the same science you said was not capable of though of the liberal studies? if its not based on science, then you have no yardstick but some arbitrary notion of "primitive"
Guess that thought process is expected of a wannabe roman just like fellow coreligionists the wannabe arabs
Their civilizational roots lies in barbaric Rome
You should visit church sermons sometimes it's as enlighting as a madrassa
Anyways
The christiandom was so primitive that it will even put savages to shame. My apologies to savages.
Do you know in the 16/17 century a pope married his own blood sister , had a son and he decreed that portraits etc of Jesus will be replaced by his son potrait and people will worship the same as Jesus and they did for more than a century lol.
Now what kind of society is that ?
Anyways don't talk about civilization with soul harvesters , because they have none , though they have expertise in destroying the same all over the world .
As for modern India we are worse off then we were in pre islamic invasion period.
India was a knowledge house unrivalled anywhere else in the world then
Now we a shell of a people no roots or rather cluthing at roots hollowed out by termites both internal and external.
Last edited: