LoC Warfare tactics

Tilt rotor drone
DHL-Parcelcopter-3.0-Delivery-Tiltrotor-Drone-image-1-630x420.jpg

Need something like this which can tilt its rotors and come to a hover, and fly like a quadcopter through jungle or inside a building.

Need minature version of Raytheon Bomerang III implemented on SOC to fit on drone.

That Huge plane seems like bait for stinger missiles. :cautious:


When are US-supplied drones going to start patrolling the LoC and other areas?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aashish
It has DIRCM and a gazillion flares and can operate above MANAPDS range and has 4 engines. It will also immediately pinpoint the dumbass who fired it and they'll be hit with an instant artillery barrage of 105mm, 40mm and 25mm.

Lockheed AC-130 - Wikipedia
In our case it's all mountainous terrain where it can't fly much higher, also locating fundoos is quite difficult unlike in Middle East where the untrained idiots run like sheeps openly. All thanks to Uncle Sam for training our neighbor to run professional Jihad factory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paro
That Huge plane seems like bait for stinger missiles. :cautious:
I would dare anyone to try. I've seen a Hip take a direct hit from MANPADS and fly away, so a huge 4-engined cargo plane simply wouldn't give a damn even it it got past the DIRCM and flares. At best it takes out 1 engine and the firer gets turned into a red mist.

And that copter won't fly up in the Himalayas.
 
Last edited:
In our case it's all mountainous terrain where it can't fly much higher, also locating fundoos is quite difficult unlike in Middle East where the untrained idiots run like sheeps openly. All thanks to Uncle Sam for training our neighbor to run professional Jihad factory.
How high do you think a quadcopter can fly. The answer is nowhere near as high as an AC-130, which can fly more than twice as high as a Havoc. Nor will it have anything like the endurance. Of course a Reaper drone with Viper Strike would be the other option for persistent surveillance and attack.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Paro
How high do you think a quadcopter can fly. The answer is nowhere near as high as an AC-130, which can fly more than twice as high as a Havoc. Nor will it have anything like the endurance. Of course a Reaper drone would be the other option for persistent surveillance and attack.
Reaper like armed UAV is better IMO due to long endurance, low observability, and low risk and low maintenance characteristics.
Also they can be used for round the clock recon.
 
Making a hole is not the problem, keeping it intact is. The is a huge cost to construct what you proposing.
Rs 1 crore aid to kin of martyred paramilitary jawans: Rajnath Singh
Rs 1 crore aid to kin of martyred paramilitary jawans: Rajnath Singh


No cost is greater than lives of our soldiers. I was thinking something something like Vietnam tunnels but not cramped, with modern facilities. They would be clean plastered with cement. Infiltrators will be detected by hidden sensors and observation posts. Infiltrator wouldn't even know what hit him, he would think a route is undefended or unobserved, and would walk right into our trap. And we are hiding not because of fear but to trap the infiltrator. Their Mujahid or Fidayeen cheap militia would just vanish in our traps, eventually they will stop sending them.

Our troops will move between bunkers and barracks using tunnels. Basically Pakistan will not be able to detect our presence and movements.
 
Madam.

LoC Warfare tactics


Why Poonch???

Two reasons:

1. Proximity of inhabitations on Indian side with rather large population sizes in near proximity to the LoC. This allows for easy merging of infiltrators with the local population, once they have crossed over.

2. Topographical considerations. A heavily forested area, relatively lower altitudes and shorter distances to traverse to hit road head for further movement, along with the point 1 above, allow for relative mobility as compared to other sectors, say Kargil or Batalik.


Occurrence of Sniper fire on our posts in this sector or it's sub sectors is not a mere coincidence, nor is the fact that this sector is guarded by the biggest brigade of Indian army - 93 Infantry Brigade. Whilst its also true that there are many sectors along our 740 km LoC where not a single bullet has been fired in almost 2 decades.

Correction: 93 Brigade is not the biggest Brigade in terms of troops. It is 102 Infantry Brigade along with 109 Infantry Brigade. The troops composition in number of infantry units, artillery units will remain unmentioned.

Retaliation and response on LoC warfare is generally proportionate, meaning localized, calibre to calibre ,

Madam.

It is the policy only implemented by India. There have been instances of Pakistani regulars shouting across that they have the freedom to fire when they want and the Indian troops will have to call Delhi before firing.

The reason for the relative calm in other locations is the lack of adequate opportunities for infiltration due to reasons mentioned earlier. A similar trend of frequent and consistent attempts by Pakistan to push militants across in Keran sector is noticed, as this sector too has the factors of thick forests, relatively low altitudes and smoother gradients but suffers from the handicap of sparsely populated region and longer distances to reach main towns/villages to merge in population.




So how do we compensate for our disadvantage in Poonch?
The most logical step is to deploy more troops than Pakistan and that is why it is imminent to have one of the biggest brigade - 93 Infantry Brigade, look after Poonch.
Next step would be to construct more posts than Pakistan so as to fire in mutual support. So every time Pakistan army fires from their post they get a befitting reply from not one but several Indian posts


I have an alternate and, in my opinion, a better suggestion. We must declare the right of Indian forces to hit any point that supports infiltration as a legitimate target in it's counter terror/counter insurgency operations. Since Pakistan, on record, has always maintained only non-military support for militants in J&K, we must "assume" that their troops supporting the infiltration, are doing so without their explicit consent. Therefore, we must believe them and say exactly what they say, and hit anyone who is firing at us consistent with their claims.

To implement this, I suggest on station air assets in terms of Gunships and FW aircrafts with Forward Air Observers embedded till as such time as we can acquire armed drones and use them in relay for precision strikes on these 'militant' positions.[/QUOTE]