No im not. I’m still saying that what I said is true(AFAIK). And what’s the confusion here ?This is what you have said
"LOL, Obviously Python with those large physical control surfaces , is slower than than TVC equipped Chinese, Russian and western counterparts during the endgame. But obviously you can’t understand that. and ECCM are not divine thing given to “Israel”. Almost all modern SRAAMs are equipped with ECM and ECCM capability including AIM 9X, IRIST and PL10."
Now are you going back to compare control surfaces vs TVC, instead of missiles? And don't claim things about Aster which you don't know about.
Speed at Endgame is not Max speed but much lower than that due to high Gs pulled during the manoeuvre.
And TVC is more efficient than Physical Control Surfaces. It’s a fact. Even @hellbent posted many DRDO research articles relating to that here in DRDO thread.
PAC ? But they did share the Data. Otherwise why would they lie about that.I have no reply to this, but just to laugh that PAF shared data of JF-17 with Eagle Dynamics.
It maybe not completely accurate but still.