theprint.in
I assume he's including private sector in that statement. Most of that number might just be validation of various sub-systems or something.
LVM3-M5/CMS-03 MISSION
October 26, 2025
India’s LVM3 launch vehicle is scheduled to launch the CMS-03 communication satellite in its 5th operational flight (LVM3-M5) on November 02, 2025. CMS-03 is a multi-band communication satellite that will provide services over a wide oceanic region including the Indian landmass. CMS-03, weighing about 4400kg, will be the heaviest communication satellite to be launched to Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO) from Indian soil. The previous mission of LVM3 launched the Chandrayaan-3 mission, where in, India became the first country to land successfully near the lunar south pole.
The launch vehicle has been fully assembled and integrated with the spacecraft and has been moved to the Launch Pad on October 26, 2025 for further pre-launch operations.
LVM3-M5/CMS-03 MISSION

I heard the GSAT 7 series have advanced anti jamming and spoofing capabilities. But the civilian GSAT have no anti jamming capable all?
Whats he trying to convey here?
Key Details:•The upcoming launch will use Skyroot’s Vikram rocket series, following the successful Vikram-S suborbital mission in 2022 — India’s first private rocket launch.
•This new mission will be commercial, carrying satellites for paying customers.
•Skyroot is backed by global investors like Temasek and GIC, and aims to scale up to one launch every three months next year — eventually targeting one launch per month by 2027.
•The company’s goal is to make India a hub for affordable and rapid space access for global clients.Skyroot’s upcoming mission could place India among a select group of nations with a strong private-sector presence in orbital launches![]()
You're agreeing with him on his lackluster performance comment.Whats he trying to convey here?
He criticise indian mentality while showing all the symptoms of typical Indian parent of the 90s, who wanted nothing short of perfection, right off the bat. People need to understand the nature of development when it comes to Science. It doesn't happen in a vaccum and specially not with this mentality.
Can ISRO be improved. Heck yes, as with any other govt agency mired by ideological interference and sub standard recruitment policies that doesn't do justice to the the 21st century itself.
But then further "hollow" out of agencies will happen cause most of the space we see was occupied by rot. Not success. Seriously, time to stop taking cue from news correspondents when it comes to the working in STEM field. They are good for relaying news, not development, because most of us have become prone to having a very one dimensional view when it comes to things.
A defense "expert" will only focus on utopian defense sector neglecting the effects of pleothra of other things.
Environmental "expert" will focus on trees and crackers but can't understand how environment is actually saved under SDG.
Foreign Policy "expert" thinks that good diplomacy = cozy relations. And that we are the one who has all the burden and responsibilities to have good relationship, no matter how the opposite side actually is.
Some non-science background, Scientific "expert" thinks that a research organisation doesn't need a good management and maintaining status quo is of legacy practices is more important cause otherwise, it might " hollow" out the orgs. Yeah, that's the point. Hollow out so you can actually fill it with innovation supported ( hopefully led) by pvt startups. ISRO and DRDO didn't have successfull programs because of govt but just some genius people with connections, using their influence for the right things. Especially under the socialist/hard state nature of our govts since 1947. That means, we need to tap into the pool of geniuses without connections. Promote startups pls and you do that by focus on pvt sector.
I am not saying that every decision when it comes to internal reforms in ISRO, DRDO, CSIR etc will be perfect just like the wider reforms in the sector itself. Both will take time, but change is needed. To put things into motion. Bring friction and smooth things out. But this borderline crab Mentality is a worry.
You're agreeing with him on his lackluster performance comment.
Then giving reasons justifying the lackluster performance and targeting him for having lot higher expectations from ISRO than ISRO can deliver.
If you consider you're reasons to be valid, then we should just accept that we do not have any hope of competing and closing critical techs gap over time with other leading countries.
Because the international competition in these field is not just about advancment in tech, its also about relative advanced compared to other competitors.
& Competition matters.
A new benchmark has emerged space x, and china reliably closing gaps.
Expectations will increase as the new benchmark of what is considered great achievement has emerged.
A car with ac was great achievement in past, now ac is one of the most basic of things, Expectations have shifted.
And in age of internet every indian is exposed to achievement of space x, Expectations have shifted
So the quote *worrying* mentality will spread.
In the current age, and bench mark of what Is considered impressive. achievement of isro's current launch will be looked down upon.
.