How did North Korea get its nuclear weapons?

Detection and analysis of xenon isotopes for the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty international monitoring system. - PubMed - NCBI

Abstract
The use of the xenon isotopes for detection of nuclear explosions is of great interest for monitoring compliance with the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty (CTBT). Recently, the automated radioxenon sampler-analyzer (ARSA) was tested at the Institute for Atmospheric Radioactivity (IAR) in Freiburg, Germany to ascertain its use for the CTBT by comparing its results to laboratory-based analyses, determining its detection sensitivity and analyzing its results in light of historical xenon isotope levels and known reactor operations in the area. Xe-133 was detected nearly every day throughout the test at activity concentrations ranging between approximately 0.1 mBq/m3 to as high as 120 mBq/m3. Xe-133m and 135Xe were also detected occasionally during the test at concentrations of less than 1 to a few mBq/m3.

Nocookies

South Korea says traces of radioactive xenon gas were confirmed to be from a North Korean nuclear test earlier this month, but it was unable to conclude whether the test had been for a hydrogen bomb as Pyongyang claimed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aashish
This is how India Worked

India’s unsafeguarded nuclear program has relied on overseas, and often illicit, procurement of tributyl phosphate (TBP), a dual-use chemical used in purifying uranium, separating plutonium from irradiated fuel, and other nuclear processing operations. Although this material is not expressly controlled by suppliers’ export control laws, it is controlled by many countries’ “catch-all” requirements if the end user is an unsafeguarded nuclear program.
This case study highlights the role of trading companies or front companies inside a proliferant state as vital nodes in a transnational smuggling network. India’s unsafeguarded nuclear program has successfully acquired TBP by utilizing a network of domestic trading companies and overseas suppliers that obscure the true end user and exploit loopholes in national export control laws. The 2008 waiver granted by the Nuclear Suppliers Group for the sale of civilian nuclear technology to India risks making it easier for India to procure items for its military nuclear programs, which are formally excluded from the exemption. It goes without saying that suppliers need to exercise greater vigilance against such schemes. However, even the most responsible suppliers in both the United States and abroad invariably have difficulty implementing catch-all clauses. For a less responsible supplier, catch-all clauses are often circumvented altogether, as the examples in this case study demonstrate.
An Indian national with detailed knowledge of the commercial chemical trade in India combined details in public records on imports of TBP to India with knowledge about which companies were winning bids for procuring specific amounts of TBP for the NFC and from which countries they were buying it. Based on the Indian national’s findings, the Indian Department of Atomic Energy’s (DAE) Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC) in Hyderabad procured about 250 tonnes of TBP between 2006 and 2007 from Germany and Russia. Indian trading companies, which either obtained contracts to purchase TBP from the NFC, or from another Indian company, then sought the TBP from Europe and Russia without ever revealing the true end user to the supplier. Figure 1 summarizes the known chain of enquiries and purchase orders that originated at the NFC, and passed to domestic trading companies before being conveyed to brokers and suppliers in Germany and Russia. As is evident, the Indian trading companies served to camouflage the true recipient, India’s unsafeguarded nuclear program. The suppliers shipped the TBP to the Indian trading companies, with these companies and not the NFC listed as the recipient. According to the knowledgeable Indian source, the trading companies then transferred the TBP to the NFC or to one of its agent companies. This strategy is similar to that used by Pakistan and Iran to illicitly obtain critical dualuse items usable in a nuclear program. Pakistan and Iran both use domestic companies that are not tied directly to the nuclear program and that may appear to be buying for a legitimate non-nuclear end use. One difference in the Indian case is that its tender
process involves public advertisements in major newspapers and on the internet. One such tender was issued by the Indian Department of Atomic Energy’s Directorate of Purchase and Stores for the Hyderabad Nuclear Fuel Complex on September 9, 2005, for a total of 216 tonnes of TBP to be delivered over a span of three years, commencing in April 2006.1 Although the winner of such a bid may not be announced publicly in India, the fact that a major unsafeguarded nuclear entity is openly searching for nuclear dualuse items is often public and is detectable simply by scrutinizing Indian newspapers and other open sources. India had acquired TBP from China before 2003, but it encountered difficulties with this
procurement route after China tightened its controls on TBP. Prior to April 2003, according to the knowledgeable Indian expert, the NFC received shipments totaling at least 100 tonnes of TBP from China. However, this arrangement was inadvertently disrupted following the discovery by U.S. authorities of a Chinese shipment of 20 tonnes of TBP to North Korea.2 The United States protested the shipment to the Chinese government, expressing its concern that North Korea was exploiting China’s weak controls to obtain TBP for its nuclear industry. In response, China cracked down on exports of this chemical. By April 2003, the Chinese authorities had implemented new regulations restricting TBP exports. When in 2004 and 2005 the NFC attempted to purchase an additional 100 tonnes of Chinese-made TBP, Chinese companies did not make the sales due to problems with the Indian companies’ end user certifications. When the Chinese supply dried up, the Department of Atomic Energy looked elsewhere. In April 2006, a Mumbai trading company, labeled Trading Company E in figure 1, obtained a contract to seek 160 tonnes of TBP for NFC. The trading company contacted a German chemical company’s subsidiary liaison office also located in Mumbai (Trading Company F in figure 1). The company’s headquarters in Germany received the order for the TBP and arranged for its supply by a Russian manufacturer located in Moscow (Supplier C). The NFC was apparently not aware of the identity of the TBP supplier; certainly, the NFC was not interested in the supplier learning of its role. In any case, the Russian company did not appear to inquire. Six shipments of TBP were sent to the Mumbai trading company between August 2006 and April 2007 from both Russia and Germany, via the German chemical company’s Mumbai office. According to the knowledgeable Indian source, the consignments were delivered to the NFC. But the procurement efforts of the Indian NFC did not stop here. In July 2006, another German company (Supplier A) exported a total of 35.5 tonnes of TBP to its subsidiary in Mumbai (labeled Trading Company B). This shipment was transferred to Nama Chemical Industries Hyderabad, which is India’s indigenous
manufacturer of TBP, although Nama appears to have been unable to produce sufficient TBP for the NFC. It is also possible that Nama found it cheaper to import the TBP instead of producing it themselves. According to the knowledgeable Indian source, the imported TBP was held at Nama under the cover that it was indigenously produced. It was later sent to the warehouses of the NFC. A different Indian trading company (Trading Company D) acted without the assistance of an intermediary to directly procure a total of 32 tonnes of TBP from the same Russian
company. These imports were received in two separate shipments that arrived in September 2006 and February 2007. Another Indian trading company in Mumbai (Trading Company C) imported an additional 16.4 tonnes TBP from a Russian company (Supplier B). It is not known whether India’s illicit imports of TBP continued after April 2007.



k.png


kk.png


ISIS, 2009 Report
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aashish
He also said Mr. Choi was “discussing the supply of weapons of mass destruction,” in reference to the attempted sale of the missile components described by the police.
If they're trying to sell WMDs to terrorists, whether to go to war or not will no longer be a choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aashish
The headquarters for Office #39 sits in downtown Pyongyang, not far from Kim Jong-il’s official office building, and very close to the Koryo Hotel—which is often frequented by foreign tourists. Through its offices in Pyongyang, it operates through government and KWP-run front companies such as Daesung Chongguk (which has been known to have offices in Austria), and Zokwang Trading Company
(which has an office in Macao). All of the many front companies in the web that runs North Korea’s diverse illicit activities answer directly to the building in Pyongyang that houses Office #39. This Office, in turn, answers directly to Kim Jong-il, who is known to often oversee the actual disbursement of funds derived from its many activities. In the past, Macao was one of the key operating centers for the companies that answer to Office #39, and was often seen as the center overseas point. In Macao, dozens of North Korean “merchants” holding diplomatic passports ran the nerve center for many of North Korea’s operations in East Asia and other areas of the world for several years—keeping what worked out to be a de facto consulate running from the small island city. The diplomatic status of the North Koreans, combined with Macao’s lax banking laws, made
it relatively easy to literally launder suitcase loads of counterfeit money, or money earned from drug operations (among others) through banks in the former colony of Portugal. Pyongyang has also reportedly used these banks to deposit and/or exchange currency used in missile deals and other deals relating to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) projects that North Korea has proliferated in recent years.

kkkkk.png



Kim Jong-il reportedly maintains a slush fund from these activities worth billions of dollars, and has used banks in Macao and banks in Switzerland (among others) in the past, to hide funds that can be used for whatever purpose is designated as being for the good of the people. Interviews conducted by reporters from the Wall Street Journal with intelligence officials in East Asia produced estimates that the slush fund generated by Office #39 amounted to hard currency in the vicinity of $5 billion.11 Recent pressure from the U.S. Government on banks in Macao (beginning in 2005), and publicity regarding holdings in Switzerland, may have caused a number of the secret bank accounts to be moved to banks in Luxembourg.12 During August 2006, other reports surfaced alleging Pyongyang had moved some of its monetary accounts to a bank in Singapore.13 Events initiated by the U.S. Treasury Department caused Macao’s banking regulators to freeze $25 million worth of North Korean accounts in the Banco Delta Asia, the most notable of the “Macao Connections” that the U.S. Government had singled out. Press reports indicated that Zokwang Trading Company, the primary front company for illicit activities centered in Macao, closed its headquarters on the fifth floor of an office building near Banco Delta Asia. Reportedly, most of its personnel have relocated to Zhuhai, just across the border in China proper. An analysis of the network that exists for North Korea’s illicit activities shows that a plethora of front companies under the auspices of Office #39 have become the important moneymaking operation that is not only used for an illegal slush fund, but to sponsor a wide variety of actions the government and the KWP in Pyongyang would otherwise be too short of funds to accomplish. The line of control runs from Kim Jong il, to the front companies, to the activities that they carry out, and then back to Kim Jong-il as the profits from these activities roll in. As the next section will demonstrate, this KWP operation has been ongoing since the mid-1970s (but has apparently increased in scope in the past 10 years), and its complexity shows that the North Korean regime is not only effective in conducting these activities through front companies and banks willing to launder their money, but they are also effective at keeping their operations covert.

Drug Trafficking.

Drug trafficking by Office #39 is another aspect of criminal sovereignty because it plays to North Korea’s distinct advantages as a nation-state. While organized crime and terrorist and insurgent groups involved in drug trafficking must contend with circumventing state authority and avoiding interdiction at each node of the trafficking network, North Korea grows, manufactures, processes, warehouses, and transports
drugs freely. North Korean refugees describe the country as a “narco-state in which all aspects of the drugs operation—from school children toiling in poppy fields to government-owned processing plants to state-owned cargo ships and trading companies— are controlled by Kim [Jong-Il].”15 In short, there is no government to circumvent; in fact, the state itself actively participates in all levels of drug production
within the country. “State collective farms and youth brigades [are] used to produce opium to earn hard currency. Villages had to meet production targets, and the military helped with distribution.”16 According to North Korean defector Kim Young-il, North Korea began its illicit drug production in earnest during the late 1970s, and opium produced on farms is sent to pharmaceutical plants in the Nanam area of Chongjin
in Hamkyong Bukto Province where it is processed into heroin.17 International aid workers assisting North Korea during its famine in the 1990s reveal the level of state penetration in heroin production. We could not figure out why farmers that I interviewed said they had a third of their land in their villages not farmed. There is a certain Korean word they used, “Pomyong.” Recently, we learned that the term in North Korea means the land is put aside for poppy production. They shrewdly substituted a word for “fallow land” for poppy production. So it is actually state-managed, state-run, and there is an allocation made in state farms for actually producing poppy. It is not illegal. It is encouraged. State-supported drug production, however, is not for domestic consumption. The major narcotics that North Korea produces are heroin and methamphetamine, which are exported around the region and around the globe. North Korea must still circumvent international law and domestic laws of other countries to turn a profit. Once again, North Korea is able to leverage its powers as a nation-state to aid circumvention. Office #39 facilitates the international distribution of narcotics by using national assets such as military and commercial vessels for transportation, diplomatic personnel to sell to wholesale markets, and state-owned businesses to launder the profits to escape seizure. The depth and scope of North Korea’s trafficking capabilities can be seen in the examples of interdiction that have occurred over the years.
Much of the drug transportation to the wholesale drug markets run by underworld groups is done with North Korean ocean-going vessels. North Korean ships have been known to rendezvous with Japanese vessels in North Korean territorial waters to transfer narcotics. However, North Korean military vessels have ventured in other territorial waters to conduct drug drops. In 2001, the Japanese Coast Guard and
a North Korean ship exchanged fire, resulting in the sinking of the North Korean naval vessel that was operated by North Korean special forces. Japanese authorities subsequently determined that the North Korean ship entered Japanese waters to deliver methamphetamines
to Japanese Yakuza members.19 In the following year, Taiwanese authorities stopped and searched a Taiwanese fishing trawler which contained
174 pounds of heroin that it had received from a North Korean gunboat.20 In 2003, Australian police arrested three men in a coastal village west of Melbourne who had received $50 million of street-ready heroin from a dinghy launched by the state owned North Korean ship, Pong Su, which lay just off shore. North Korea has used its merchant fleet to act as a middleman for other groups involved in drug trafficking by bartering
other goods, such as weapons, in exchange for drugs. A North Korean vessel laden with small arms was detained by authorities in Myanmar who believed that local insurgent groups were intent on trading heroin for the arms. North Korea has also used its diplomatic corps to aid
the transport of drugs directly to wholesale markets that lie in specific countries. This was particularly evident in the 1990s, but stretches as far back as the 1970s. In 1977, after only 3 years of diplomatic ties, Venezuela expelled all North Korean diplomats for trafficking drugs. In 1996, Russia arrested a North Korean envoy with 50 pounds of heroin in his possession.23 In 1998, Egyptian police arrested a North Korean diplomat who was attempting to smuggle 500,000 tabs of rohypnol (also known as the “date rape drug”) into Egypt while Russian authorities arrested two North Korean diplomats in possession of 35 kilograms of cocaine. Later the same year, German police arrested the North Korean deputy ambassador who possessed heroin that was believed to be manufactured in North Korea, and Chinese authorities arrested a North Korean consulate employee with 9 kilograms of opium. However, with the exposure of its use of diplomatic personnel for distribution of drugs to the wholesale market, North Korea was forced to adapt by outsourcing this portion of drug trafficking to organized criminal groups such as the Yakuza. Once again, North Korea was able to take advantage of its power as a nation-state. For criminal organizations, a state partner offers a
steady supply of high quality drugs, escape from the inefficiencies associated with avoiding enforcement, and resources exceeding those of a typical nonstate group. For North Korea, this arrangement balances risk reduction with satisfactory profit, capitalizing on the state’s competitive advantage in creating an enforcement-free production environment, eliminating competition over distribution, and obtaining cover
of plausible deniability. Such partnering with organized crime has reduced North Korea’s exposure to interdiction efforts, and has led several countries like the United States, China, and Russia to focus on how to trace and intercept the regime’s proceeds. North Korea’s ties to organized
crime in Asia, and elsewhere, appear to be both diverse and extensive. They have reportedly engaged in sophisticated drug drops at sea with the Yakuza from Japan (using Special Operations Forces). North Korean drug smuggling has also been linked to the Russian Mafiya and other organizations in Europe and Southeast Asia.29 Pyongyang has even been establishing links with Taiwanese organized crime syndicates—reportedly inviting members to North Korea for meetings. Receiving and laundering the proceeds of drug trafficking has largely been done through foreign banks in China, Switzerland, and Luxembourg. However, North Korean banks, namely Banco Delta Asia, have been at the forefront. The Macao branch of the bank has faced ever growing scrutiny by the international community and tighter controls by Chinese
authorities. As previously discussed, $25 million of the bank’s assets in Macao were frozen in 2005, and more stringent requirements for opening of new accounts appear to be taking their toll.31 In an effort to avoid further scrutiny and tighter controls, it appears that Office #39 has once again turned to North Korea’s diplomatic corps. In February 2006, North Korean diplomats were caught smuggling $1 million and 200
million yen in cash into Mongolia.

Counterfeit Currency Operations.

North Korea’s long history of illegal drug manufacture and sales all over Asia has now become fairly well known. But until recent years, one of its other sources of hard currency for Kim Jong-il’s slush fund was not as well known—counterfeit currency. Part of the 2005 action undertaken by the U.S. Government against banks in Macao was to staunch Office #39’s laundering of counterfeit United States $100 bills.33 The U.S. Secret Service has said on several occasions that the North Korean-manufactured counterfeit U.S. $100 bills currently in circulation are the most sophisticated in the world (thus leading to their widely used nickname—”Supernotes”). North Korea’s counterfeit currency operations are
extremely sophisticated and run by skilled experts. According to press reports, high-tech equipment from Japan was acquired to manufacture the bills, as well as paper from Hong Kong and ink from France. By 1989, millions of dollars of this fake American currency was being distributed worldwide. It is probably important to point out at this point that North Korea is the only government in the world known to be running
a counterfeit money operation as a matter of state policy.35 The North Korean counterfeit distribution network includes diplomats, Chinese gangsters, organized crime syndicates in Asia and elsewhere (possibly Russia), banks (especially in Macao), and criminals associated with the Irish Republican Army. Defectors alleged in 2005 that a factory in the city of Pyeongseong prints the counterfeit $100 bills—and
this assessment was also supported by recent travelers to North Korea and China. According to press reports, the bills have often been exchanged with Chinese merchants at 50 percent of their value and then mixed in with real bills. North Korean intelligence services have reportedly used the Supernotes to finance activities overseas, and even for foreign purchases made on behalf of Kim Jong-il. The counterfeit U.S. banknotes were discovered in Manila, the Philippines, in 1989, and months later were also unearthed in Belgrade, Serbia. The bills have also surfaced in a diverse set of places such as Ethiopia, Peru, Germany, and once again, Macao.38 The bills have even surfaced in Lebanon’s
Bekka Valley.39 According to Yonhap, the semi-official information arm of the South Korean government, the number of bogus U.S. bills detected in the country has increased since 2005—again mostly in $100 bills, and again, likely from North Korea.40 The Supernotes
have even surfaced in Las Vegas, Nevada—reportedly first during 2005. In 2007 a Chinese businessman was arrested there who was apparently using the casinos to help launder the bills that he had acquired from the North Koreans. The bills have also been linked to North Korea’s WMD proliferation—as reportedly they are sometimes used in transactions. In 2006, a 3-month investigation by the Chinese government, of accusations that North Korea was using banks in Macao to launder counterfeit profits, confirmed suspicions raised by the U.S. Government. South Korean diplomats revealed to the press that Chinese officials had expressed their concerns regarding the counterfeiting of U.S. currency to a North Korean delegation during a visit to Beijing, China, by Kim Kye-kwan (a highly placed North Korean diplomat holding the title of Vice Foreign Minister).42 North Korean counterfeit U.S. bank notes reportedly surfaced in Hong Kong during February 2006.43 In what was
probably an indicator of concern in Beijing, in March 2006, the Peoples Bank of China issued a directive to financial institutions to “increase vigilance” against fake $100 bills.
 
This has now become idiotic. Why would the UK be helping the craziest person in the world develop a nuclear missile that can hit it?

As I've already said, I don't know who the companies are.

The front companies are to side-step economic sanctions. It's about money not missiles.

It is obvious who's helped North Korea develop ICBMs. Only one other country in that area has them. This is not rocket science, if you'll pardon the pun.

Its about money?
Are you suggesting the UK willingly violating UNSC resolution 1718, which is under Chapter 7 . That means legally binding.

Good going, UK.
 
Last edited:
Its about money?
Are you suggesting the UK willingly violating UNSC resolution 1718, which is under Chapter 7 . That means legally binding.

Good going, UK.
No, I'm suggesting that, like every country, the UK has criminals who break the law. This is no different to drug dealers breaking the law and hiding their proceeds in a complex web of investments and businesses. The London property market has empty apartment blocks in which rent is being paid on every single apartment, they are used by criminals for washing money because the property market is so strong. Bit coin is also being used by NK and other criminals to side-step sanctions. The will exists to enforce the law and has done for some time, yet we still have criminals, just like every other country.

You can't blame the UK just because foreign criminals try exploit it.

Furthermore, China's help with building the Hwasong-15 is far more than some minor electrical components. The HS-15 is not a first attempt ICBM from an emerging nuclear state by a long shot and bears considerable dimensional similarities to the SS-24 Scalpel in both diameter, length and shape.

rt23_2.jpg
171129205202-03-nk-missile-launch-kcna-via-ap-large-169.jpg
 
If I go by Iraq example I would say someone is preparing for a War.
Yeah, Iraq 2003 was the right time for a war but the wrong country. For some reason the US suddenly got really dumb at foreign policy at the start of this century.
 
No, I'm suggesting that, like every country, the UK has criminals who break the law. This is no different to drug dealers breaking the law and hiding their proceeds in a complex web of investments and businesses. The London property market has empty apartment blocks in which rent is being paid on every single apartment, they are used by criminals for washing money because the property market is so strong. Bit coin is also being used by NK and other criminals to side-step sanctions. The will exists to enforce the law and has done for some time, yet we still have criminals, just like every other country.

You can't blame the UK just because foreign criminals try exploit it.


rt23_2.jpg
171129205202-03-nk-missile-launch-kcna-via-ap-large-169.jpg

No, but UK hold a responsibility toward rest of the world. That is UK's territory which is used.

Are you suggesting the MI6 and MI5 unaware of what happening inside there own territory? MI6 & MI5 are such pathetic? Are you saying UK loosing writ over there own territory? And unable to control some thugs?

Are you suggesting the UK financial institutes are so much compromised, that they unaware of such activities, or willingly keeping there eyes close?

Furthermore, China's help with building the Hwasong-15 is far more than some minor electrical components. The HS-15 is not a first attempt ICBM from an emerging nuclear state by a long shot and bears considerable dimensional similarities to the SS-24 Scalpel in both diameter, length and shape.
China hold a clear cut policy of violating norms when it comes to DPRK, because of there own strategic advantages. What strategic advantages are of UK?
 
North Korea and Biological Weapons


excerpts from here - https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/North Korea Biological Weapons Program.pdf

1513694506188.png

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un tours facilities at the Pyongyang Bio-Technical Institute, July 2015. Circled
in this photo are potential dual-use fermenters. Rodong Sinmun


North Korea’s Biological Weapons Interests

South Korean sources report that North Korea established a biological weapons program under Kim Il-Sung. During the Korean War (1950- 1953), North Korea’s population experienced outbreaks of cholera, typhus, typhoid, and smallpox, which North Korea falsely attributed to biological weapons attacks by the United States. This provided an impetus for creating its own BW program. The exact timeline is unclear. According to recent
defector Tae Young-Ho, a former North Korean diplomat, North Korea’s chemical and biological weapons program started in the early 1960s, and according to a South Korean Defense White Paper, North Korea began weaponizing biological agents in the 1980s. Furthermore, it is known that North Korea’s soldiers are vaccinated against smallpox, suggesting either an interest in an offensive BW program or a biodefense precaution.

Unlike its current rhetoric regarding its nuclear program, however, North Korea has at times adamantly denied the existence of its BW program. In 2005, in response to a U.S. State Department report to Congress alluding to North
Korea’s BW development,5 North Korea stated through their state newspaper Rodong Sinmun that it “does not possess any biological weapon and has been implementing the Biological Weapons Convention with good will.”
North Korea has even attempted to reverse the narrative around its BW program by falsely claiming that the United States is willing to engage in biological warfare against North Korea as it did in the Korean War. In 2015, when U.S. forces accidentally brought live Bacillus anthracis test samples and Yersinia pestis samples to the Osan Air Force base in South Korea, North Korea immediately issued a statement denying the existence of its BW program and accused the United States of targeting North Korea with a biological weapons attack. It even called on the UN Security Council to investigate the United States.

The current status and the future of North Korea’s BW program remain unclear. Sources from the 1990s claim that North Korea intends to develop an offensive BW program, but recent official statements from North Korea do not support this claim. Regardless, it is certain from government statements, defector testimonies, and circumstantial evidence such as the smallpox vaccination of North Korean soldiers that at least in the past, North Korea has held an interest in developing biological weapons.

North Korea’s Biological Weapons Capability
Accurately assessing North Korea’s BW capability is challenging without access to classified intelligence. The ROK Ministry of National Defense has disclosed partial intelligence reports via White Papers, reports, and testimonies at the request of the South Korean legislature. These reports, in addition to several sources from the United States, South Korea, and the former Soviet Union, indicate that North Korea has the capability to cultivate pathogens for BW purposes and weaponize them. However, language describing North Korea’s BW program has been softened in
some U.S. assessments.

With a healthy grain of skepticism, a reasonable assessment is that North Korea has the capability to cultivate and produce biological weapons.

North Korea is assumed to have several pathogens in possession. The 2000 ROK Defense White Paper mentions anthrax and smallpox most frequently. Since 2012, the plague (Yersinia pestis) and others have been on the list as well (see Appendix for a more detailed description of North Korea’s BW program in the White Papers since 2000, and in unclassified U.S. intelligence reports). Agents mentioned in the White Papers, however, are not exhaustive. More information on North Korea’s BW has been disclosed through other occasions (Table 1), which maps out 13 agents:

Bacillus anthracis (Anthrax), Clostridium botulinum (Botulism), Vibrio cholerae (Cholera), Bunyaviridae hantavirus (Korean Hemorrhagic Fever), Yersinia pestis (Plague), Variola (Smallpox), Salmonella typhi (Typhoid Fever), Coquillettidia fuscopennata (Yellow Fever), Shigella (Dysentery), Brucella (Brucellosis), Staphylococcus aureus (Staph), Rickettsia prowazekii (Typhus Fever), and T-2 mycotoxin (Alimentary Toxic Aleukia).


In addition to possessing these agents, the Ministry of National Defense assessed that North Korea may even have capabilities to weaponize them. Section 3 includes a discussion on the extent to which it can weaponize and deliver the agents to targets.

1513694613919.png


However, a series of photos of the Pyongyang Bio-technical Institute released by the North Korean state media in 2015 raised concerns for dual-use. Analysis of these images revealed that the Pyongyang Bio-technical Institute could produce military-sized batches of BWs, specifically anthrax.13 The modern equipment visible in these images also showed a violation of the Australia Group’s dual-use items list, and showed that it is possible to convert the facility from pesticide to BW production

Procurement Channel for Dual-Use Items
Images of the Pyongyang Bio-technical Institute in 2015 revealed that North Korea has dual-use equipment that violates export control based on the Australia Group. Compared to the thorough monitoring of dual-use items
used for North Korea’s nuclear program, procurement channels and the flow of BW dual-use items are less well understood. Part of the reason for this is that in the case of BW, distinguishing between items intended for military
purposes, agricultural applications, and public health efforts is difficult. For example, a European non-governmental organization provided training and basic equipment for bio-pesticide production to the North that may have
inadvertently contributed to North Korea’s ability to produce BW. Currently there is a need for clearer identification of procurement channels through which North Korea obtains its equipment and technology to produce BW.

Weaponisation

It is unknown whether North Korea has the capability to weaponize all 13 types of agents, and whether North Korea has the capacity to produce a mass stockpile of stabilized biological agents. Regarding the first aspect,
little information is available. The ROK Defense White Paper mostly mentions anthrax and smallpox, so these could be agents that North Korea has higher capability to weaponize. However, it is important to note that despite an investment of 40,000 personnel over 63 years (1928-1991), the Soviet Union’s BW program yielded only 13 weaponizable agents. Although increase in biological knowledge in the modern era could expedite weaponization, it is highly unlikely that all of North Korea’s agents are ready for weaponization.

Regarding the second aspect of mass production, Kim Jong-Un’s visit to the Pyongyang Bio-technical Institute showed bio-pesticide production facilities at a massive scale, which could allude to its capacity to mass-produce
BW agents. However, some experts doubt that North Korea can mass produce BWs28 and little is verified by publicly available information.
 
No, but UK hold a responsibility toward rest of the world. That is UK's territory which is used.

Are you suggesting the MI6 and MI5 unaware of what happening inside there own territory? MI6 & MI5 are such pathetic? Are you saying UK loosing writ over there own territory? And unable to control some thugs?

Are you suggesting the UK financial institutes are so much compromised, that they unaware of such activities, or willingly keeping there eyes close?


China hold a clear cut policy of violating norms when it comes to DPRK, because of there own strategic advantages. What strategic advantages are of UK?
The UK does its best, and it's in its interests too. Meanwhile countries like China and Russia have a vested strategic interest in keeping NK in place, so their authorities probably aren't trying very hard at all, and their newspapers won't even report on sanction breaches.

Well they obviously found out eventually, hence why there was a story. And in case you haven't noticed, MI5&6 are kind of busy with Islamists lately and inevitably, for every few dozen plots foiled, one of those gets through as well. So yes, they keep an eye out but they are not omniscient.

Dude, the only reason you have those stories is because someone's eyes were open. If they were as dumb as you'd like to make out, you'd have no stories to post.

Answered the last part already. The UK gave a lot of lives to stop South Korea being overran by NK, in what were probably the bloodiest battles ever besides D-Day. If there was a button we could press to make NK go away we would press it. Well, there is such a button actually, but unfortunately it also gets rid of the hosts as well as the parasites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aashish
Let's not get carried away here. A power resistor and pressure transmitter are not state-of-the-art or even high technology. You could buy them from Maplin or RS Components, or even ebay/amazon.
I agree,
Power resistor » Resistor Guide

Power Resistor can be a part of a number of equipment -- including automotives-- So that power resistors may have been scavangered from electric braking system of an old WV or a Jag. Or it may have been a spare for one.
 
Curbing Nuclear Proliferation: Security Council Sanctions on the DPRK*
Acting on “the Most Dangerous Peace and Security Issue in the World”
DPA Politically Speaking

The situation in the Korean Peninsula is at the top of the global agenda right now. Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman, returning from a rare visit to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) by a senior UN official, recently called it “the most tense and dangerous peace and security issue in the world today.” The Security Council discussed non-proliferation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) again today, a meeting that saw the participation of the Secretary-General and senior representatives of a number of member States.

1514091545604.png




Over the last 11 years, the Security Council has responded unanimously to a series of nuclear and missile tests conducted by the DPRK with increasingly tough texts imposing sanctions and calling for a peaceful, diplomatic solution to the situation. The first set of Security Council sanctions came in October 2006, following the DPRK’s first nuclear test. With the adoption of resolution 1718 (2006), the Council established the 1718 Committee, which is tasked to oversee the relevant sanctions measures relating to the DPRK.



After the country’s second nuclear test, in 2009, the Sanctions Committee created a Panel of Experts to oversee the implementation of the sanctions measures and report twice a year to the Committeeand the Security Council. The Panel of Experts is based in New York and gathers, examines and analyzes information from States, relevant United Nations bodies and other interested parties regarding the implementation of the measures, in particular, on incidents of non-compliance. The Panel of Experts makes recommendations on actions that the Council, Committee or Member States may consider to improve implementation of the measures; and has the power to ‘name-and-shame’ Member States in case of non-compliance in their biannual reports.

The focus of the sanctions measures has shifted over the years. The focus of sanctions measures was initially the DPRK’s nuclear and missile programs. They were subsequently extended to include other weapons, as well as knowledge and training that could further the DPRK’s nuclear program. Gradually, sanctions on financial dealings and on luxury goods were included as well. And now sanctions cover any kind of revenue generation by the DPRK, like the coal, fish and textile industry and migrant workers, as well as target the DPRK’s access to energy sources.

All resolutions imposing sanctions contain clauses that the measures imposed are not intended to have adverse humanitarian consequences for the DPRK’s civilian population. Nonetheless, the tightening sanctions measures having unintended side effects, is an issue that is frequently discussed within the UN system. Even if the sanctions measures include exemptions for specific entities and activities, certain countries and institutions may not want to take the risk of running afoul of the sanctions regime and therefore avoid engaging with the country.

In addition to resolution 1718 (2006), the Council has adopted eight sanctions resolutions: one in 2009, two in 2013, two in 2016 and three so far in 2017.

For more information on the 1718 Committee: Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1718 (2006) | United Nations Security Council Subsidiary Organs

* This story is being updated following the adoption of Security Council Resolution 2397 (2017) on 22 December 2017.

Curbing Nuclear Proliferation: Security Council Sanctions on the DPRK*
 
Chinese Ships Spotted Selling Oil to N.Korea
  • By Yu Yong-weon, Kim Jin-myung
  • Dec 26, 2017 11:22
U.S. reconnaissance satellites have spotted Chinese ships selling oil to North Korean vessels on the West Sea around 30 times since October.

According to South Korean government sources, the satellites have pictured large Chinese and North Korean ships illegally trading in oil in a part of the West Sea closer to China than South Korea.

The satellite pictures even show the names of the ships. A government source said, "We need to focus on the fact that the illicit trade started after a UN Security Council resolution in September drastically capped North Korea's imports of refined petroleum products."

The U.S. Treasury Department placed six North Korean shipping and trading companies and 20 of their ships on sanctions list on Nov. 21, when it published spy satellite images taken on Oct. 19 showing a ship named Ryesonggang 1 connected to a Chinese vessel.

2017122601111_0.jpg


The department noted that the two ships appeared to be illegally trading in oil from ship to ship to bypass sanctions.

Ship-to-ship trade with North Korea on the high seas is forbidden in UNSC Resolution 2375 adopted in September, but such violations are nearly impossible to detect unless China aggressively cracks down on smuggling.

The problem is that any oil embargo imposed on the North in the event of further provocations will probably be futile as long as illegal smuggling continues.

It is uncertain whether the Chinese government is deliberately looking the other way, but it seems unlikely that it is unaware given the sheer volume
Chinese Ships Spotted Selling Oil to N.Korea
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paro and Sathya

If Russia starts a nuclear war, the Kim Dynasty won't have any decisions to make, it'll be going.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bon Plan

If Russia starts a nuclear war, the Kim Dynasty won't have any decisions to make, it'll be going.
Pray do tell what's the connection Paddy ?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Innominate