France: Teacher beheaded in Paris; Macron calls it ‘Islamist terrorist attack’


I think you need to turn this into a sticky thread. @Ashwin

The peacefuls have taken a shine to Macron & the French who as of now are still clueless as to the love they've not even worked for leave alone worked hard to inspire.

You could also turn this into an omnibus thread for all attacks by peacefuls in Europe, the reactions of the ordinary Europeans & political groupings against it followed by counter terrorism operations.

I've a feeling this'd travel quite far & last a long time. Baat nikli hi hain toh door tak jaayegi.
 

I think you need to turn this into a sticky thread. @Ashwin

The peacefuls have taken a shine to Macron & the French who as of now are still clueless as to the love they've not even worked for leave alone worked hard to inspire.

You could also turn this into an omnibus thread for all attacks by peacefuls in Europe, the reactions of the ordinary Europeans & political groupings against it followed by counter terrorism operations.

I've a feeling this'd travel quite far & last a long time. Baat nikli hi hain toh door tak jaayegi.
This used to be standard operating procedure in Old delhi and some areas of Gujrat in 90s. These guys will just come out stab a few and run away. Finally RSS and Bajrang Dal decided to teach them a lesson. This used to happen just after Friday Namaz. RSS & BD took positions within the shops owned by Hindus and the moment they started this, they blocked the street from both ends. After that whosoever tried to rescue this stabber was also taken to task and killed. It resulted in riots in which the Abduls were outnumbered and taught a lesson of their lifetimes. It has not happened after that in both these areas.
 
Stabbing comes naturally when they are trained to behead animals from young age. When PTSD affects soldiers then what you think Muslim kids will grow up with killing animals every Eid.

This is one of the reason why Islamic countries, specially Paxtan, blames everyone else for violence in their societies. It's basically an escape, a denial of how much hatred and uncivilized behavior their inherited ideology propagate.
 



Whoever said hypocrisy a uniquely British virtue is dead, eh Paddy? Read above to discover British perfidy at it's finest.

They couldn't do anything to control the cancer spreading in their society , rather they quite enjoy being cuckolded repeatedly - another uniquely British trait & institution.

Hence - हम कुछ करेंगे नहीं और किसी को कुछ करने भी नहीं देंगे!
@BMD
 

Macron’s France Vs Anglo-American liberalism: religious radicalism or radical secularism​


Good watch
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volcano



Whoever said hypocrisy a uniquely British virtue is dead, eh Paddy? Read above to discover British perfidy at it's finest.

They couldn't do anything to control the cancer spreading in their society , rather they quite enjoy being cuckolded repeatedly - another uniquely British trait & institution.

Hence - हम कुछ करेंगे नहीं और किसी को कुछ करने भी नहीं देंगे!
@BMD
Right because one article in the Financial Times (that may well have been written by a Muslim) speaks for everybody.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustCurious



Whoever said hypocrisy a uniquely British virtue is dead, eh Paddy? Read above to discover British perfidy at it's finest.

They couldn't do anything to control the cancer spreading in their society , rather they quite enjoy being cuckolded repeatedly - another uniquely British trait & institution.

Hence - हम कुछ करेंगे नहीं और किसी को कुछ करने भी नहीं देंगे!
@BMD

India to France :

images
 
Whoever said hypocrisy a uniquely British virtue is dead, eh Paddy? Read above to discover British perfidy at it's finest.

Well, they didn't earn the nickname 'Perfidious Albion' for nothing.

Right because one article in the Financial Times (that may well have been written by a Muslim) speaks for everybody.
Well I remember to have pointed out several articles from BBC on India which basically reiterates terrorist propaganda verbatim.
 
Well I remember to have pointed out several articles from BBC on India which basically reiterates terrorist propaganda verbatim.
You're missing the point completely. BBC, CNN etc. these news networks don't represent the people of the countries they live in. Unfortunately there's this thing called freedom of expression here, which gives groups like Charlie Hebdo or the BBC the right to express opinions. People can also make comments on YouTube. Many of these will be ridiculous and don't represent the people of the host country and some won't be. I can tell you that most people in the UK support Macron on terrorism, even if they think he's an asshat besides.

Is BBC India even British or Indian? What denomination are the presenters?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Proud_Indian
Right because one article in the Financial Times (that may well have been written by a Muslim) speaks for everybody.
This isn't a question of 1 random article. It's the whole ecosystem that facilitates this behavior that deserves to be challenged & defeated on their own turf. Arguably the ordinary Briton doesn't endorse these views as seen from the recent poll results, but you certainly have done nothing to defang the ecosystem or even attempt to take them on . In fact, you subsidise sub standard media like the BBC. With the result , they're encouraged to find newer pastures & not being used to having their views contested this is precisely how they behave.
 
Good news for you Paddy. @BMD



This shirt, made of KEVLAR material is currently selling well in mainland Europe to face the threat of stabbing & beheading that are rampant in European countries.
Magic from Textile Engineers!


 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and jetray
This isn't a question of 1 random article. It's the whole ecosystem that facilitates this behavior that deserves to be challenged & defeated on their own turf. Arguably the ordinary Briton doesn't endorse these views as seen from the recent poll results, but you certainly have done nothing to defang the ecosystem or even attempt to take them on . In fact, you subsidise sub standard media like the BBC. With the result , they're encouraged to find newer pastures & not being used to having their views contested this is precisely how they behave.
We have no choice but to subsidise the BBC unless we give up the right to own a TV. You own a TV in the UK, you pay a TV license, which is used to fund the BBC. As for The Times and related newspapers, I don't buy them.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: JustCurious