Any act of terror will act of war - L mera.
This will be a huge setback for GoI if that’s the case. Let’s see how this plays out.
Any act of terror will act of war - L mera.
Any act of terror will act of war - L mera.
Unless they are trying to downplay this to maintain a state of ambiguity unlike Pahalgam where aggressive statements had more or less made it clear retaliation was inevitable for fauji foundation to prepare, their terming of action against "anti-national forces" and refusal to call it pak-sponsored terror makes it look like internal cleanup more than large scale strikes by trying to downplay the severity of this to prevent political fallout. At best guided arty rounds and loitering munitions in case it escalates.This will be a huge setback for GoI if that’s the case. Let’s see how this plays out.
Munirs doctrine is pre-empt. If we dont posture what does he preempt?Now we won't be blamed for aggression if something untoward happens ..
are they trusting the Munira to do the needful ..
Unless they are trying to downplay this to maintain a state of ambiguity unlike Pahalgam where aggressive statements had more or less made it clear retaliation was inevitable for fauji foundation to prepare, their terming of action against "anti-national forces" and refusal to call it pak-sponsored terror makes it look like internal cleanup more than large scale strikes by trying to downplay the severity of this to prevent political fallout. At best guided arty rounds and loitering munitions in case it escalates.
Yeah. Read the cabinet resolutionwhy do i feel like this guy is trolling
Same. After repeal of farm laws, this statement cum resolution has been most disappointing when it comes to political will and decision taken by GOI.Simplest Rationale - They know who did it but can not pin it and the without clincher proof, diplomatic fallout is too much to bear. Lack of diplomatic support was a takeway in 1.0 too.
Now if there is a climbdown on IWT, the sab changa si process will be complete. Lets see. Not happy today TBH
@_Anonymous_ your thoughts ?
It was precisely due to the previous incident (which involved Pakistani nationals) that the boys in Pindi have changed their approach. Many people speculated that Pakistani nationals and soil will not be used to conduct the next terror attack. They were right. The complication now is that the GoI will need to put together proof that there are enough links to terror outfits based in Pakistan. Unlike the Israelis we do not operate under the blanket of a superpower. This will be a slow process. I had previously stated the same. People who are expecting immediate retaliation - It is unlikely to happen. The element of surprise is gone. Exercises are ongoing near IB and an operation can be launched quickly. However, there are certain constraints that are imposed upon GoI. Also, there is a general expectation that Sindoor part 2 will cause damage to certain assets that were not targeted during part 1. This is turn (expectation from the public) needs to be managed well.This will be a huge setback for GoI if that’s the case. Let’s see how this plays out.
Nothing new about internal modules, internal elements, and sleeper cells as you said correctly. And this Bangladesh, Nepal, and Doha, Turkey also is not new.You think they will really do internal cleanup? If this was stated as Pakistan operated terrorist attack, then I would believe that they will do internal cleanup cause the tag of Pakistan sponsored will deter oppurtunists.
But now oppurtunists will be out on streets and professional protestors will start getting jobs at scale, when GOI tried to clean internal modules. Cause , we all know what it will require to do so. What kind of places to be monitored and raised for search.
Then there's whole SIR issue. Isn't that also part of cleanup. And since it was said that Bangladesh-nepal route was used.. what do we do with bangladesh? Are illegal Bangladeshis are the anti-national?
And the fking bio terror plan!! How are agencies going to find another such plans, since this might just embolden anti national forces. Causes conviction rate under UAPA is very low. Will they get hanged? Anything less than that is self defeating.
Qurban Ali Khan was a key figure in the establishment of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and is recognized for his contributions to the country's intelligence framework. The "Bleed India with a Thousand Cuts" doctrine, which involves covert warfare against India, is often associated with the strategies developed during the time of leaders like Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and General Zia-ul-Haq, but Qurban Ali's role in the ISI's formation laid the groundwork for such military doctrines.
Highly likelyOnly few reasons that I can think of..
Since both sides are well prepared, losses will be higher ..
Pakistan is already in free fall .. lets not divert that. Which is why I think Munir will try again, bolder..
You clean today, and then after 2 years they will come up with new modules. Ab aisa hi chalta rahega kya?First let us clean the Country from within
Chances any such misadventure are indeed high (when viewed historically). More than anything the govt. needs to ensure that should such a thing come to pass the retaliation should be such that the operation should not end in ambiguity and should result in a decisive victory (which is a hard ask but what the public demands). However, such an operation will likely turn into a full scale war. The Pakistanis also need a victory or at least need to sell a victory convincingly.Only few reasons that I can think of..
Since both sides are well prepared, losses will be higher ..
Pakistan is already in free fall .. lets not divert that. Which is why I think Munir will try again, bolder..
And this time the attackers will plan the attack near elections. To fit into the new narrative of opposition.Chances any such misadventure are indeed high (when viewed historically). More than anything the govt. needs to ensure that should such a thing come to pass the retaliation should be such that the operation should not end in ambiguity and should result in a decisive victory (which is a hard ask but what the public demands). However, such an operation will likely turn into a full scale war. The Pakistanis also need a victory or at least need to sell a victory convincingly.
Chances any such misadventure are indeed high (when viewed historically). More than anything the govt. needs to ensure that should such a thing come to pass the retaliation should be such that the operation should not end in ambiguity and should result in a decisive victory (which is a hard ask but what the public demands). However, such an operation will likely turn into a full scale war. The Pakistanis also need a victory or at least need to sell a victory convincingly.