Breaking: ICC issues arrest warrant for Putin

Killing of hundreds of men in lieu of gang raping a nun ? In that case how many British should we have killed given the British Pimpire was busy kidnapping underaged girls to staff their brothels for their soldiers ? Whatever the number deemed acceptable by you , put it up & know that we'd kill 4-5 times the number of Paddys for it given the Paddys are animals anyway . Who's going to miss them especially since they've been bumped off a dime a dozen by the British yet they seem to thrive like all vermin do .





Has anyone asked for the loot to be returned ? I've yet to see the Malaysian Indonesian or SL government ask for it ?

Aren't you aware of SL kings participating in India for wars & war booty ? Or the Indonesian / Malayan kings looting Chola vessels which brought about the Invasion in the first place . Those acts of piracy long succeeded the sack of Srivijaya .







Quotes an example from an Islamist who in order to justify the loot killings rapine of Islamic rulers fetch out obscure details of some expedition launched by Hindu kings against their counterparts .

Aren't you aware that those idols used to be respectively consecrated by these kings who captured such idols in such temples in their own kingdoms ?

And are you seriously quoting examples of Hindu kings fighting each other out here which would be the equivalent of the English & Scottish kingdoms fighting each other & both of them buggering the Paddys . How would you resolve this situation internally Paddy ? Remember what I wrote you earlier saying conversations with you see a massive drop in IQ points .



Quoted from an Ambedkarite forum , equivalent of the Black Panthers or any such extremely left wing radical outfits whose aim is propoganda , distortion , exaggeration & outright lying. Do you see an references there Paddy .

Remember the IQ points conversation ....?



Go thru the whole conversation , dunce.
Funny that isn't it? I could present a million documents describing how the Cholas looted other countries, but you have an excuse for each one. At least I don't deny the looting the British did. That was pretty much the sole driver for empires both then and before.


Chola military campaigns late 10th and early 11th centuries were in fact plundering raids. This is done to ensure the entry of spoils, which can be in the form of livestock, jewelry, and other forms of property.
 
Funny that isn't it? I could present a million documents describing how the Cholas looted other countries, but you have an excuse for each one. At least I don't deny the looting the British did. That was pretty much the sole driver for empires both then and before.

The "excuse" as you term it is the equivalence you seek to draw between British pimping aka British Pimpire aka settler colonialism & the Chola expeditionary raids . A more proper analogy to the Cholas & their expeditionary raids across present day SE Asia would be the wars fought between the Anglos & Spanish Empires with Spanish fleets being regularly subjected to piracy by British "corsairs" ( man I love the English language ) .

The only settler colonialism the Cholas or for that matter any Tamil Nadu based empire indulged in was in Sri Lanka . SL to these Tamil Empires was what Paddyland was to Britain. Moreover since the Lankans weren't exactly Paddys they gave as good as they got , frequently tying up with rivals of the incumbent dynasties in TN or outside of it , financing such expeditions , sending their armies across to mainland India to collaborate with such rivals to wage war on these Tamil monarchs . So unlike the Paddy vs British affair which was boringly one sided , there was a lot of to & fro between those Tamil monrachs & SL as well as with those empires in present day Indonesia & Malaysia .

You've been quoting the Cholas relentlessly since ages . How much serious reading have you done on it ? Clearly not much . In fact it's zero going by your Paddy inputs here which aren't even sub standard but far less than it . Which is what has been my experience & that of any other Indian member & dare I say the French membership here too . Which is precisely why I wrote earlier that whenever anybody here has a conversation with you on geopolitics , geostrategies , geoeconomics the IQ level of the entire conversation drops several IQ points in a flash much like the LSE these days .


 
  • Like
Reactions: Amal
  • Like
Reactions: Amal and Bali78
Perhaps, but India has never issued a formal apology for gang raping a nun before the massacre either? That said, the massacre itself was obviously wrong, but the events leading up to it are often omitted, which creates a false picture. There had been several mutinies and attacks of British civilians, which left the people in charge convinced that the illegal gathering was another insurrection. They were incorrect however, and the gathering was broadly peaceful and took place because the notice that such meetings had been banned, was not as well communicated as it should have been.

Has India ever returned any of the loot the Cholas took?


one nun assaulted by a few criminal elements does not need an aplogy. They were dealt as criminals by the govt of the day and punished. And said govt decided to do more and attack an entire country using that excuse and massacred 1000s.

If that's the logic you want to use then maybe said nun should not have come to a country where she was not welcome to start with.
Perhaps, but India has never issued a formal apology for gang raping a nun before the massacre either? That said, the massacre itself was obviously wrong, but the events leading up to it are often omitted, which creates a false picture. There had been several mutinies and attacks of British civilians, which left the people in charge convinced that the illegal gathering was another insurrection. They were incorrect however, and the gathering was broadly peaceful and took place because the notice that such meetings had been banned, was not as well communicated as it should have been.

Has India ever returned any of the loot the Cholas took?


VS Naipaul said that in 1970s. By 1990s he had become one of India's biggest cheerleaders and wrote a book called 'million mutinies' on it.

' a little knowledge is a dangerous thing'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amal
one nun assaulted by a few criminal elements does not need an aplogy. They were dealt as criminals by the govt of the day and punished. And said govt decided to do more and attack an entire country using that excuse and massacred 1000s.
That's not the full picture either. They were several attacks and mutinies, both thwarted and not thwarted. Dangerous times were followed by an overreaction, which was a typical mistake of the British throughout history (e.g. Boston Tea Party, Easter Rising).
If that's the logic you want to use then maybe said nun should not have come to a country where she was not welcome to start with.

VS Naipaul said that in 1970s. By 1990s he had become one of India's biggest cheerleaders and wrote a book called 'million mutinies' on it.

' a little knowledge is a dangerous thing'
Well yeah, fair argument, but it's not the same as deciding to gas all Indians simply because they're Indian a la Hitler.
 
That's not the full picture either. They were several attacks and mutinies, both thwarted and not thwarted. Dangerous times were followed by an overreaction, which was a typical mistake of the British throughout history (e.g. Boston Tea Party, Easter Rising).


Well yeah, fair argument, but it's not the same as deciding to gas all Indians simply because they're Indian a la Hitler.
Remember what did we tell you about dropping IQ points rapidly in a conversation with you??

Here's another example of it.

India had a total population of ~ 330 million people at Independence. You think it's a joke to gas these many people, Paddy? To add to it, the Jews rarely put up resistance. You actually think 330 million Indians would go to their deaths in a peaceful manner , like Gandhi lead his non violent agitations
.

Are you insulting our intelligence or displaying yours?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and Amal
That's not the full picture either. They were several attacks and mutinies, both thwarted and not thwarted. Dangerous times were followed by an overreaction, which was a typical mistake of the British throughout history (e.g. Boston Tea Party, Easter Rising).

Well yeah, fair argument, but it's not the same as deciding to gas all Indians simply because they're Indian a la Hitler.

If there were lots of attacks and mutinies then it means, leave and get the f**k off....
 
Funny that isn't it? I could present a million documents describing how the Cholas looted other countries, but you have an excuse for each one. At least I don't deny the looting the British did. That was pretty much the sole driver for empires both then and before.


Chola empire no longer exists. So what they did is irrelevant. British govt exists and is a continuation of the one that colonized and plundered the world.
 
Chola empire no longer exists. So what they did is irrelevant. British govt exists and is a continuation of the one that colonized and plundered the world.
The British Empire no longer exists either, and the British government of 2023 is hardly the same as the British government of the 19th century.
 
The British Empire no longer exists either, and the British government of 2023 is hardly the same as the British government of the 19th century.
Of course the British Pimpire exists . What're you doing holding Gibraltar , the Falkland Islands , Diego Garcia , your holdings in the Caribbean , the Pacific etc .

It's a truncated British Pimpire but it is the British Pimpire . Call a donkey an *censored* , it still brays like you do & call poop , sh!t it still stinks like you do . More than your views I might add .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and Amal
The British Empire no longer exists either, and the British government of 2023 is hardly the same as the British government of the 19th century.

No it's not. It is a continuation of the same govt system that existed during colonia era. If you dissolve the UK and declare yourself as independent wales, ireland etc. then we can consider you a different system.
 
No it's not. It is a continuation of the same govt system that existed during colonia era. If you dissolve the UK and declare yourself as independent wales, ireland etc. then we can consider you a different system.
Nope. The monarchy no longer has the same powers as 1751. The regulations on voting have all changed since 1751, and not one single person from 1751 is still around. It's not even the same India as far as that goes. Only individuals can be responsible for crimes.
 
Nope. The monarchy no longer has the same powers as 1751. The regulations on voting have all changed since 1751, and not one single person from 1751 is still around. It's not even the same India as far as that goes. Only individuals can be responsible for crimes.

Same constitution of 1920s, same legal structures of 1920s, current state is continuation of that state