Brilliant.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
My cryogenic endogamous 2000 year old salmon swimming back to mate ....
Cheers, Doc
The Vedic World
- Thread starter Guynextdoor
- Start date
- Status
Brilliant.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
My cryogenic endogamous 2000 year old salmon swimming back to mate ....
Cheers, Doc
Everything in Kazakhstan is Iranic and Zoroastrian.
Including but not limited to the open fire temples.
The Kazakhs, the Kyrgyz, the Uzbeks, the Tajiks, the Azerbaijani, are all Zoroastrian people.
Not Hindu.
Cheers, Doc
Exactly and they all are the same people who were defeated and thrown out of India. I have explained that in another post.
A simple Wikipedia search shows that these people u mentioned like Kazakhs , Uzbeks are ethnic turks , so are Turkic people also Zoroastrian?
The folk songs of Yugoslavia, Czech republic and Romania pay ode to their ancestors who arrived from east-India.
But steppes did have people. The kurgan culture (around 5000 BCE) The corded ware culture (around 4000 BCE), Yamanya culture (around 3500 BCE), Andronovo culture (around 2000 BCE), Sintashta culture (around 2000 BCE), BMAC (around 2300 BCE)..... These were pastoral cultures (except for may be BMAC) which revolved around domestication of the horse and horse based transport.
You mean Vasant Shinde. Then that's the only paper that so far has been published on the Rakhigarhi excavations. No official paper on the DNA samples collected from the skeletal remains has been published. The preliminary info on its connection to the Irula tribe is mentioned by Anand rai, who is one of the researcher involved in the study, in an interview to a media house.
I am still waiting for someone to give an alternative theory as to why the highest concentration of Aryan genes to the tune of 50-60% present in central Indians and steppes people only.
I really don't place much premium on this "Aryan gene". We don't have a concensus on who or what constitute an Aryan, much less know anything about their gene. "
I've pointed you clearly in the direction.
If you want me to take the effort, I will, once I'm off my phone.
Cheers, Doc
OK. Let us forget Aryan Genes. Let us concentrate only on genetic similarity. It still does not expalin what I asked for. That picture does show that central Indians have same genes as the people of steppes. If we had somekind of intermixing with these original Aryans, the darkest contours should have been in the North west India. But it is clearly not the case.
Sigh ....
No it does NOT.
The graphic is limited to the "Aryan gene" ONLY.
R1a.
Not genes or genetic makeup in general.
Please at least read the context of your line of argument.
Cheers, Doc
As I stated that let us consider it purely as genetic pool irrespective of anything else. Why is it darkest in central India and steppes only. Please explain that to me. forget about everything else. Let us not even consider it as genetic data. let us consider it as linguistic data. Does this not show that the darkest regions have commonality.
Yes it does.
On the R1a gene.
As high as 40% in some southern ASI populations.
60% in northern Tiwari and Kashmir brahmins.
And around 20% in the Iranians.
Now please read why most of the world is justifiably suspicious of the R1a and the R1a1a as "Aryan" markers.
And does the Neolithic Old Iranian farmer (from which we are descended, and whom Iranian Zoroastrians and Parsis most closely cluster to from within their resident populations) have R1a.
It is important that you read. Because the other R1a proponent has been absent for many pages now, with the discussion actually getting technical and detailed. And hence not conducive to shoot and scoot anymore.
Cheers, Doc
I just fail to understand what are you arguing about. You have posted papers after papers which claim central asian genes for Aryans and you have also tried to show that Iranians are the original Aryans. You have also tried to prove that Iranians are the forefathers of Indians. But that very post with that genetic markers clearly demolish your theory. Whatever or whoever North Indians are, they are more closely related to people in central asia and steppes than Iran. SO your theory is completely defeated that Iranians are forefathers of Indians.
Let us niot even talk about the DNA strand and just talk about the people.
- Status