Jammu & Kashmir live updates: GOI remove all provisions of Article 370

Not necessary. Check what happened with old Warsaw pact countries which got divided into bosnia, croatia etc. Sindh has a population of just about 4-5 crores and most of them maintain their roots with Hindus. They can be converted back to hinduism in due course.

What about it? Most of them weren't Muslims (even their Muslims aren't as brainwashed as Pakistani ones); and the USSR was able to handle them because it wasn't a democracy.

For a democracy like India, such a demographic bomb would be doubly dangerous. What makes you feel that Sindhis are still connected to roots and could be reverted; any specific reason?
 
First of all it is a Matter related to National
Security

Then what about the Rights of Ladakhis
And Pandits and Jammu people which were
Being taken away by Sunni Muslims of Kashmir

Third did you recently see the Furore over SC
ST act

Parliament will AGAIN pass a law overturning any such stupid judgement

SC will be insulted

Fourthly , SC is only concerned with the Fundamental Rights which they call as
Basic Structure of Constitution

People all over India have welcomed this

They know this fact

What I am saying is whether this is unconstitutional or not isn't up to us to decide. Whether action is lawful or not will be decided by the court & verdict will be made by Court. As of now, those who are saying this is unconstitutional have a fragile ground. There is no insult to Supreme court if parliament make or change a law . SC's duty is to interpret and make sure that everyone is following the law and parliament's job is to make law for the peoples based on their democratic mandate.

You are correct in pointing out that as long as an action didn't violate the fundamental rights, Parliament can pretty much override it with new law. However, if the parliament passed a law that SC finds to have violated constitution, and parliament passed law to override it, SC can still strike it down & that will cause constitutional crisis. In that case, either president have to dissolve the parliament, suspend constitution or Parliament have to impeach SC judges. And that would be an insult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
What would we do with POJK?

Giljit baltistan is really useful because it would cut Pak off from China and give us a land route to Central Asia.

But POJK ??? It’s just a bunch of poverty-struck, rabidly Muslim, uneducated, aggressive and useless people.

Nothing worth having there.
 
What would we do with POJK?

Giljit baltistan is really useful because it would cut Pak off from China and give us a land route to Central Asia.

But POJK ??? It’s just a bunch of poverty-struck, rabidly Muslim, uneducated, aggressive and useless people.

Nothing worth having there.
Gilgit and Baltistan would have extremely poor connectivity with rest of J&K.. Managing thoes areas without disintegrating Mod edit :Pakistan would be really difficult..

May be @Falcon and @vstol Jocky can enlighten on operation feasibility post capture of that area..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
Reactions: phndrt
What would we do with POJK?

Giljit baltistan is really useful because it would cut Pak off from China and give us a land route to Central Asia.

But POJK ??? It’s just a bunch of poverty-struck, rabidly Muslim, uneducated, aggressive and useless people.

Nothing worth having there.
Just check out the boundary of POJK. Dogra Rajputs were not idiots. They created a state which dominated all the mountains leading into their state. The boundaryline of POJK is the last pir panjal range hills over looking Islamabad and the plains of earstwhile India which led from khyber pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mastaan
What I am saying is whether this is unconstitutional or not isn't up to us to decide. Whether action is lawful or not will be decided by the court & verdict will be made by Court. As of now, those who are saying this is unconstitutional have a fragile ground. There is no insult to Supreme court if parliament make or change a law . SC's duty is to interpret and make sure that everyone is following the law and parliament's job is to make law for the peoples based on their democratic mandate.

You are correct in pointing out that as long as an action didn't violate the fundamental rights, Parliament can pretty much override it with new law. However, if the parliament passed a law that SC finds to have violated constitution, and parliament passed law to override it, SC can still strike it down & that will cause constitutional crisis. In that case, either president have to dissolve the parliament, suspend constitution or Parliament have to impeach SC judges. And that would be an insult.

If SC judgement is Overturned there will be NO constitutional crisis

SC judgement in SC/ ST atrocity act was overturned last
 
Just check out the boundary of POJK. Dogra Rajputs were not idiots. They created a state which dominated all the mountains leading into their state. The boundaryline of POJK is the last pir panjal range hills over looking Islamabad and the plains of earstwhile India which led from khyber pass.

As per your experience in how many days we can effectively take Athmuqam , MirPur ?
 
Mirpur is easy but the plains of jammu and Sialkot will see some very intense fighting. GB is not possible without opening another front to tie down PA in Punjab.

Sir I dont see any merit in getting our soldiers killed for occupying territory

Anyway right now in monsoon we cannot freely operate Heavy Equipment
 
Preparation, determination in public and leadership, some hard diplomacy, consolidating economic gains.

Preparing the chiken to be cleaned, we need to keep it in hot water.

After that, 7 months to 3 years.

We may have finally removed the pest problem on our west.

As for now, nothing more serious than 27th or 3/4th will happen