dark waters.Soon we will get back our own waters
£ lost 20% of its value. Some financial company are leaving London. And only Theresa think a soft brexit is arriving. It will be a "coup de pied au cul" Brexit in fact.
dark waters.Soon we will get back our own waters
12 planes is a large amount for training.a laugh of jealousy
RN already loosed all its skilled in carrier handling and operations. Needs years to overcome... But it's a good news in fact, because you will not have enough planes even just to train (12 ....).
The only thing certain is that the French will riot.dark waters.
£ lost 20% of its value. Some financial company are leaving London. And only Theresa think a soft brexit is arriving. It will be a "coup de pied au cul" Brexit in fact.
No.12 planes is a large amount for training.
Why?The only thing certain is that the French will riot.
The CdG was never ready to go to war, it's a floating wreck.
Good knowledge of geography there, I could swim to France without running out of fuel.but what will happen if QE runs out of petrol on way to france?
Seniors are flying them operationally. 1 training squadron is plenty.No.
You forget that one third at least is in overhaul, and that you have to train newby pilots. How many remain for senior training? 3 ?
Why do the French riot? This is a question which has puzzled social commentators for decades and they are still no closer to finding an answer.Why?
We'll see how you feel about it when Peugeot, Citroen and Renault start laying people off due to WTO tariffs and you have to cover nearly 50% of our annual payment to the EU.Personnaly I always thaught that GB was not a pure EU country : one leg in EU, one leg in USA. You have made a choice. I'm afraid it will be pain in the a** for the GB people.

unfortunately, Queen Elisabeth carrier can't swim.Good knowledge of geography there, I could swim to France without running out of fuel.
Yes, because a 10,000+nm range would require that right. Studies basically showed that the previous UK nuclear carrier never did anywhere near 10,000nm between stops, and even ignoring that factor you have refuelling ships. So a nuclear power plant wasn't selected because a) it's unnecessary and b) it costs more.unfortunately, Queen Elisabeth carrier can't swim.
A good idea is to equip QE with sails in case of. A long tradition in the RN to sail....
The problem will be the same for Volkswagen, BMW, Fiat....We'll see how you feel about it when Peugeot, Citroen and Renault start laying people off due to WTO tariffs and you have to cover nearly 50% of our annual payment to the EU.![]()
GB never had a nuclear carrier...the previous UK nuclear carrier


10000+ range? At 7 knots maybe.Yes, because a 10,000+nm range would require that right. Studies basically showed that the previous UK nuclear carrier never did anywhere near 10,000nm between stops, and even ignoring that factor you have refuelling ships. So a nuclear power plant wasn't selected because a) it's unnecessary and b) it costs more.
And whilst you boast about your cat and arrester, that system simply wouldn't be able to operate in the conditions experienced during the Falklands War.
That doesn't make any sense though, whilst exports to the EU may reduce, we are a 3:1 net importer of cars, and Nissan will have a massive opportunity to replace Renaults, Peugeots and Citroens in the UK with reliable Japanese automobiles. The market they stand to gain is 3 times as large as the one they stand to lose.The problem will be the same for Volkswagen, BMW, Fiat....
The french CEO of Renault Nissan explained some weeks ago that Nissan may leave GB in case of a hard Brexit. More jobless...
And yet we have nuclear submarines, so perhaps there is a reason for that other than the "can't do" one you're putting forward.GB never had a nuclear carrier...
You see perfectly that you dream awake of a GB Charles de Gaulle....![]()
Nope.10000+ range? At 7 knots maybe.
And what about the fuel for the planes. F35 is not very impressive in flight, but is very greedy of fuel.
During Falklands war, a classical carrier with F4 would have been far more effective than your baby carriers with short legs and short range missile subsonic jets.
2010..... You're late.And yet we have nuclear submarines, so perhaps there is a reason for that other than the "can't do" one you're putting forward.
You mean the thing that broke down recently?
French aircraft carrier set to defend Britain breaks down
It's the problem : the more Diesel for the carrier, the less fuel for the jets.Nope.
Accounted for separately, unless you think planes run on diesel.
And yet Sea Harriers were 26-0. in air combat. When has your CdG and Rafales ever fought such a war on their own and performed so well, ditto for your carrier Mirages?
T45s are new, so teething troubles. And when you say noisy, because of the 100 mile thing, you underestimate the distances things can be heard from under water. Whales can be heard from 1,000 miles away.2010..... You're late.
Do you want to speak of the noisy and poor servicability of T45 destroyers?
Do you want to speak of the numerous incidents on the Astute SSN ?
Do you want to speak about a breakdown in the HMS Vengeance, forcing it to stop a deterrence cruise?