Thanks, I wasn't familiar with his work.
A quick AI poster board:
View attachment 50684
View attachment 50685
It's postulated that a certain people called Iranian Neolithic from around the Zagros Mountains are responsible for a significant amount of gene inflow into the IVC population . They're supposed to have ingressed into the IVC anywhere from 8000-6000 YBP ( Years Before Present ) .
This group also has Anatolian Neolithic DNA. Now the thing is there are no extant samples from India from around the same time to verify this postulate.
There's a Twitter handle I follow who used to be active there but has ceased being so for some time. He also has a blog wherein he discusses the ancestry of ancient Indians & much more on this topic. This handle is of the opinion that this Iranian Neolithic group inhabited a vast landscape extending from the Indo Gangetic Plains all the way upto the Zagros Mountains where as of now the only archaeo genetic samples we have are from Iran. Hence the name Iranian N .
A lot of what I've put out is from his feed though truth be told I haven't studied the issue in granular detail . Sometimes the technical terms discussed does fly over my head . Besides ancient genetics itself is an evolving field. Most of the findings & conclusions reported around 2 decades are repudiated by the current lot working in this field .
Moreover I've coming around to the PoV that for one to have conclusive answers to the issue of ancestry , one needs samples of both sexes from site A , at an interval of 1 century for comparison to site B - the purported recipient of that gene flow following the same conditions as listed for site A.
It's impossible for one to get these conditions. Hence archaeo geneticists resort to what's known as proxy populations who inhabit say site C which though similar is not the same as site A & may or may not be in close proximity to site A & further may or may not be of the same vintage.
Archaeo genetics then is just one more tool & not the definitive tool to identify ancestry as their fervent supporters claim & more importantly can't be deployed to establish the genetic origins of any civilization beyond reasonable doubt. Generally speaking it can be corroborating evidence though in some cases it may well be clinching evidence provided the conditions I've listed above are met.
Feel free to check him out if interested.
https://x.com/agenetics1?t=bwIA5XbHzC80y8gBt92dLw&s=09
The Mittanis show zero connection with the Zoroastrians or Zoroastrianism . Whatever evidence we have suggests they were Indo Aryans.
And since we have definitive evidence of their presence in Anatolia in the mid 2nd millennium BCE , it stands to reason that the split in the Indo Iranic religion either succeeded them or that Zoroastrianism as we know it today was founded by Zoroaster in the future.
As far as the pole star debate goes I've not much information about it nor is it a topic I've looked at cursorily or otherwise but this is what Gemini has to say .
Google Search
Google Search
The Pole Star incidentally is Ursa Minoris. I used to think AI is what would redeem ethnicities like the Paddys. No such luck. AI needs to be much more sophisticated to aid them.
Likewise AI is the best story teller in the biz. Like coding coolies , animators , call center coolies even porn stars etc , the professional story teller will soon be a thing of the past.