I will say though our ICBM, IRBM and general missile technology is fairly advanced, our TEL trucks look horrendous compared to the Chinese ones. Iirc our Agni 5 TEL is literally some Volvo truck pulling the canister!
I suspect our defence establishment believes using commercial chassis/innocuous looking vehicles for towing ICBM trailers will aid in rapid dispersal and complicate detection via orbiting sats. No reason why we can't get a look-see at Russian TELs and take inspiration from them. The shock and awe effect of a dedicated TEL is something else.I will say though our ICBM, IRBM and general missile technology is fairly advanced, our TEL trucks look horrendous compared to the Chinese ones. Iirc our Agni 5 TEL is literally some Volvo truck pulling the canister!
Also in our republic day parade, we have showcased all of the Prithvis and Agnis, but the K4 has never been seen except for a 5 second video snippet. Imo we need to showcase K4 in a republic day parade. What information could be gleaned from simply seeing the missile?
The Americans said in an article recently they're not scared at all. Id reckon the CIA would have predicted the deployment of all of the weapons China showed 10 years back itself. Europe's intelligence capability is fragmented and unorganized, they don't have the mammoth resources CIA NSA does. So while US is unsuprised Europe is doing a Pikachu face.I do not know about other things, but the parade has Europe rattled. Many are surprised with the progress the PLA has made over the years. The Chinese have done a brilliant job with streamlining and optimising production of weapon systems. The R&D will has been there for a decent amount of time. The reach/speed of certain missiles were a surprise to some analysts. It seems they were considered experimental.
The YJ series is listed in the link. You can read more about them.
![]()
Chinese Military Parade Highlights Naval Drones And Missiles
The 2025 Chinese military parade in Beijing featured numerous new missiles and drones, underscoring an accelerating naval modernisation.www.navalnews.com
Their defence minister surely is "worried".The Americans said in an article recently they're not scared at all.
As long as using such trucks don't affect speed and mobility it should be ok. But I'm sure just by looking at it, Agni 5 TEL is far less suited for thr task than the monstrous TEL China has.I suspect our defence establishment believes using commercial chassis/innocuous looking vehicles for towing ICBM trailers will aid in rapid dispersal and complicate detection via orbiting sats. No reason why we can't get a look-see at Russian TELs and take inspiration from them. The shock and awe effect of a dedicated TEL is something else.
The article was in The War Zone, guy who said it was USAF chief iirc. US is still way ahead on several parameters but China is indeed catching up fast. But I feel US will still retain a lead in 5th gen deployment, 6th gen bombers, nuclear subs, nuclear weapons etc.Their defence minister surely is "worried".
BTW their rapid diversification of hypersonic missiles is worrying, from just DF17 and DF26 now they have like 7-8 types of hypersonic weapons. They will proliferate this to Pakistan very soon.I do not know about other things, but the parade has Europe rattled. Many are surprised with the progress the PLA has made over the years. The Chinese have done a brilliant job with streamlining and optimising production of weapon systems. The R&D will has been there for a decent amount of time. The reach/speed of certain missiles were a surprise to some analysts. It seems they were considered experimental.
The YJ series is listed in the link. You can read more about them.
![]()
Chinese Military Parade Highlights Naval Drones And Missiles
The 2025 Chinese military parade in Beijing featured numerous new missiles and drones, underscoring an accelerating naval modernisation.www.navalnews.com
If we're talking about till 2030 then yes.But I feel US will still retain a lead in 5th gen deployment, 6th gen bombers, nuclear subs, nuclear weapons etc
Also.The article was in The War Zone, guy who said it was USAF chief iirc.
Tbh I doubt China can field something comparable to B21 Raider which is already a 6th gen bomber by 2030. B21 will be entering service well before then and can pose major problems to China. US will also have a huge lead in space based assets which China will take much longer than 2030 to catch up to.If we're talking about till 2030 then yes.
But if we're talking about after 2030, then I'll reduce it to just nuclear powered subs(ssn) and total no. Of nuclear warhead.
China has more than catched up by now.But then again Indian missiles are very small due to very advanced composite technology compared to the Chinese missiles so maybe using mere commercial trucks is fine.
China doesn't need b21.Tbh I doubt China can field something comparable to B21 Raider which is already a 6th gen bomber by 2030. B21 will be entering service well before then and can pose major problems to China. US will also have a huge lead in space based assets which China will take much longer than 2030 to catch up to.
Agni 5 is even smaller than the comparable Chinese one which was DF21 iirc. Their newer ones carry double the number of MIRVs over longer range than our Agni 5, true. Hende they need more robust TEL to carry them and withstand launch forces. Perhaps Agni 5 doesn't need such large TEL though the current Volvo driven contraption looks rickety.China has more than catched up by now.
Their newer icbm's are larger because they are designed to carry "heavier" payloads to much longer distance.
China doesn't need b21.
Its more of pristine project for Chinese.
Us needs it, as its fighting a war half way around the world.
From Shaurya/A5 onwards, we have been canisterizing our IRBM/ICBMs, so sooner than later we'll need to adopt a proper all-terrain TEL with CTIS, armoured cabin w/NBC protection, etc. We may not have the luxury of launching from pre-surveyed sites in a conflict with the dragon.As long as using such trucks don't affect speed and mobility it should be ok. But I'm sure just by looking at it, Agni 5 TEL is far less suited for thr task than the monstrous TEL China has.
The laser failed but the jammer worked impressively tho, it's neither good or bad,Hello @Ashwin Sir
Is there a thread for Chinese Military Technologies
I didn't know where to post this