Air Engagement of Operation Sindoor : Analysis

This is what the IAF Commander said. Such words are so stupid and are not what a professional soldier should say at all.
If an average Indian tells me that one Rafale can defeat 5 J-20, I will just think he is a lunatic
But this is what an IAF commander said, which can only show that IAF is extremely underestimating the enemy and arrogant.
View attachment 44926
Have you never heard of public pleasing? + I don't think this is real as far as I remember it wasn't an IAF "chief" who said this, Eurasian times is no different than i d r w all of them only recycle others headlines. You can read any interview regarding the chinese by the IAF Chief, it's very different.
 
This is what the IAF Commander said. Such words are so stupid and are not what a professional soldier should say at all.
If an average Indian tells me that one Rafale can defeat 5 J-20, I will just think he is a lunatic
But this is what an IAF commander said, which can only show that IAF is extremely underestimating the enemy and arrogant.
View attachment 44926
Retired* IAF chief who said some BS to appease Indian public. IAF in reality will make warplans by overestimating the capability of Chinese weapons. You guys have your own fair share of even more retarded generals.



Who "suggested that the PLAN might equip civilian fishing boats for suicide attacks against the United States Navy." 🤣. Rafale against J20 is one thing but fishing boats against US Navy is on another level 🤣🤣🤣.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bon Plan
This is what the IAF Commander said. Such words are so stupid and are not what a professional soldier should say at all.
If an average Indian tells me that one Rafale can defeat 5 J-20, I will just think he is a lunatic
But this is what an IAF commander said, which can only show that IAF is extremely underestimating the enemy and arrogant.
View attachment 44926
Idiot, first learn to differentiate between "fact" and "opinion". IAF chief isn't giving his opinion that 1 Rafale >> 5 J-20s. He is merely saying what our satellites observed, which is Chinese increasing the numbers of J-20s in a 5:1 ratio vis-a-vis IAF's Rafale deployment in Tibet during post Galwan stand-off.

You HANs are absolutely delusional along with your other moronic Pakistani brothers. And that's not an opinion but a fact.
 
Retired* IAF chief who said some BS to appease Indian public. IAF in reality will make warplans by overestimating the capability of Chinese weapons. You guys have your own fair share of even more retarded generals.



Who "suggested that the PLAN might equip civilian fishing boats for suicide attacks against the United States Navy." 🤣. Rafale against J20 is one thing but fishing boats against US Navy is on another level 🤣🤣🤣.
Apart from other things, in wartime, a large number of small civilian ships were mobilized, equipped with C802 launchers, to block enemy ships in narrow waterways, because the air defense firepower channels of the Arleigh Burke destroyer were limited. In this case, there was a chance of achieving certain results. This was a strategy used by the Chinese Navy during the period when it was very weak.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RationalGuy
Idiot, first learn to differentiate between "fact" and "opinion". IAF chief isn't giving his opinion that 1 Rafale >> 5 J-20s. He is merely saying what our satellites observed, which is Chinese increasing the numbers of J-20s in a 5:1 ratio vis-a-vis IAF's Rafale deployment in Tibet during post Galwan stand-off.

You HANs are absolutely delusional along with your other moronic Pakistani brothers. And that's not an opinion but a fact.
So let's see what the IAF generals said.
Screenshot_2025-06-30-14-12-41-662_com.android.chrome.png
 
Apart from other things, in wartime, a large number of small civilian ships were mobilized, equipped with C802 launchers, to block enemy ships in narrow waterways, because the air defense firepower channels of the Arleigh Burke destroyer were limited. In this case, there was a chance of achieving certain results. This was a strategy used by the Chinese Navy during the period when it was very weak.
"Zhaozhong is known for his CCTV commentaries where he has, among other things, said that smog is a good thing for China because it would obscure US laser weapon systems in the event of an attack" 🤣🤣🤣🤣.

Is this the quality of rear admirals in PLAN? If so then God help you dear comrade. Rafale vs J20 is indeed a stupid comparison, J20 is obviously superior in every domain. But your generals take retardedness to a completely different level. Fishing ships vs US Navy, laser stopping smog 🤣. As for Rafales and J20, be rest assured, everyone in the IAF and Indian military consider J20 to be superior. You won't find any IAF person saying we will send civilian Cessna planes as kamikazes to meet J20 🤣🤣🤣.

Apart from other things, in wartime, a large number of small civilian ships were mobilized, equipped with C802 launchers, to block enemy ships in narrow waterways, because the air defense firepower channels of the Arleigh Burke destroyer were limited. In this case, there was a chance of achieving certain results. This was a strategy used by the Chinese Navy during the period when it was very weak.
Not even the Indian Navy was this desperate when US sent aircraft carrier against us in 1971. Arming civilians and sending them on suicide missions? Absolutely despicable. But then again, we are talking about a people who murdered hundreds of millions of their own children, so sending civilians for suicide missions against a superpower Navy is probably peanuts 😂.
So let's see what the IAF generals said.
View attachment 44927
That guy is a retired air Marshall spewing some shit for public consumption. You're comparing that to your admiral who wanted to send wee civilians on fishing boats against US Navy 🤣🤣🤣. Man you are so delusional. You think a fishing boats stands a better chance against the US Navy compared to Rafale against J20? Man @Ashwin please NEVER ban this chicom she brings such good entertainment 😂.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
So let's see what the IAF generals said.
View attachment 44927
Imbecile, these two quotes are different. One was by ACM Bhadauria in which he talked about Chinese literal reaction to IAF's Rafale deployment in Ladakh by deploying 5:1 J-20s vs Rafale. That is "not" an opinion by a fact/record of what really transpired because he was our Air Chief at that time.

Second quote is by a retired AM, who is just opining that Rafale(a mature Western 4.5 gen platform) is better than Chinese jets. This is his "personal opinion" not a fact. There is a difference in both and yet you fail to see this. Pathetic.
 
"Zhaozhong is known for his CCTV commentaries where he has, among other things, said that smog is a good thing for China because it would obscure US laser weapon systems in the event of an attack" 🤣🤣🤣🤣.

Is this the quality of rear admirals in PLAN? If so then God help you dear comrade. Rafale vs J20 is indeed a stupid comparison, J20 is obviously superior in every domain. But your generals take retardedness to a completely different level. Fishing ships vs US Navy, laser stopping smog 🤣. As for Rafales and J20, be rest assured, everyone in the IAF and Indian military consider J20 to be superior. You won't find any IAF person saying we will send civilian Cessna planes as kamikazes to meet J20 🤣🤣🤣.
Not even the Indian Navy was this desperate when US sent aircraft carrier against us in 1971. Arming civilians and sending them on suicide missions? Absolutely despicable. But then again, we are talking about a people who murdered hundreds of millions of their own children, so sending civilians for suicide missions against a superpower Navy is probably peanuts 😂.
Rainy weather itself is a factor that affects laser weapons. Most lasers are in the visible light frequency band, but the penetration of visible light is very low and its energy is easily absorbed by particles in the air.
General Zhang is just simply popularizing some knowledge for the audience.
It is impossible for fishermen to directly operate fishing boats, must PLA or the Coast Guard. After all, civilians cannot operate C802.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RationalGuy
Rainy weather itself is a factor that affects laser weapons. Most lasers are in the visible light frequency band, but the penetration of visible light is very low and its energy is easily absorbed by particles in the air.
General Zhang is just simply popularizing some knowledge for the audience.
It is impossible for fishermen to directly operate fishing boats, must PLA or the Coast Guard. After all, civilians cannot operate C802.
So China should produce more smog for its people and hope US lasers will fail, that US laser guided weapons will fail 😂. As for fishing boats, it's absolutely pathetic to think that crude rag tag dirty boats armed with cheap cruise missiles can pose even an iota of threat to the US Navy. You think US fighter jets would not be operating and wont destroy these sad little boats from 100s of km away? Some of your military leaders are just retarded, accept it. No wonder Xi is firing so many people from PLA, he doesn't want such retards to bungle up Taiwan invasion.

In the entire history of the Indian Navy there has never been anyone who made such a pathetic and laughable suggestion even when we were facing US Navy in 1971. Maybe you should give your Pakistani friend this fishing boat idea, after all, Pakistan Navy stands no chance against Indian Navy, maybe their fishing boats can save them 🤣.
 
So China should produce more smog for its people and hope US lasers will fail, that US laser guided weapons will fail 😂. As for fishing boats, it's absolutely pathetic to think that crude rag tag dirty boats armed with cheap cruise missiles can pose even an iota of threat to the US Navy. You think US fighter jets would not be operating and wont destroy these sad little boats from 100s of km away? Some of your military leaders are just retarded, accept it. No wonder Xi is firing so many people from PLA, he doesn't want such retards to bungle up Taiwan invasion.

In the entire history of the Indian Navy there has never been anyone who made such a pathetic and laughable suggestion even when we were facing US Navy in 1971. Maybe you should give your Pakistani friend this fishing boat idea, after all, Pakistan Navy stands no chance against Indian Navy, maybe their fishing boats can save them 🤣.
But when all your effective naval forces are destroyed, you can still rely on this method to make a final stand.
This is something that Indians cannot understand, and this is why China is so far ahead of India.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RationalGuy
But when all your effective naval forces are destroyed, you can still rely on this method to make a final stand.
This is something that Indians cannot understand, and this is why China is so far ahead of India.
When all you're effective naval forces are destroyed, you launch missiles from the coastline. Or you launch nukes. You don't send your people on mass suicide missions to die for no reason. China may certainly have superior capability compared to India, but it's thinking is so crude and pathetic. It will never become a world superpower on the league of the US military. A country which doesn't even value its own soldiers.
 
But when all your effective naval forces are destroyed, you can still rely on this method to make a final stand.
This is something that Indians cannot understand, and this is why China is so far ahead of India.
Your navy has no counter to Su-30MKI + BrahMos-A combo. PLA-N's surface fleet would get completely annihilated by the above if they try to intrude our area and there ain't a thing you guys can do about it.

For your submarine fleet, our P8Is, SMART missile launched torpedoes and our own SSK fleet is good enough.
 
Your navy has no counter to Su-30MKI + BrahMos-A combo. PLA-N's surface fleet would get completely annihilated by the above if they try to intrude our area and there ain't a thing you guys can do about it.

For your submarine fleet, our P8Is, SMART missile launched torpedoes and our own SSK fleet is good enough.
Our LRHASM will make the Singaporeans and Malaysians watch their sailors drown long before we would need to use Su30 MKI with Brahmos lol. But keep watching, dear comrade will say PLA has space lasers which can shoot down hypersonic projectiles no problem.
 
Su57 Mki version is a priority but only if we can customise this to include Indian Aesa radars and Indian weapons
Plus the new engines with flat nozzle is needed
I hear the Rcs is poor it's not stealthy but can be improved
If we can get a new upgraded Indian version by 2030 and start recruiting them by 2031 we could have 60 as a stop gap until Amca arrives in 2040 latest
Imo
140 super Mki plus 60 Su57mki is a must by 2035
Backed by 200plus Tejas both one and two
Get two more Rafale sqds with F4.2 version
Spend big money on Air defense and Awacs and definitely get longer range hypersonic missiles both air to.air and air to ground
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Su57 Mki version is a priority but only if we can customise this to include Indian Aesa radars and Indian weapons
Plus the new engines with flat nozzle is needed
All of this would happen in the MKI variant. Testing and certification will take at least 5 years. So smart move would be to order current Felon as it is, around 2-3 squadrons with source codes(so that we could integrate our weapons into it) and get them delivered from Russia within this decade itself. Meanwhile continue to develop the MKI variant with our radar, MCs and other avionics. It should be domestically manufactured from 2030 onwards. It should also come with AL-51F engines.
I hear the Rcs is poor it's not stealthy but can be improved
Earlier only means to stealth was "shape, shape, shape and materials". But with time RAM/RAS/RAP have become equally important. Su-57 uses CNT skin interwoven into its surface/airframe which absorbs radar waves across frequencies giving it very good stealth properties. Don't fall for Western propaganda. Didn't they say that Russian weapons were junk? But look at the latest Ops and judge for yourself. Everytime we have dialled Russian weapons with our software/avionics/other stuff, result was a game-changing weapons system. Same will happen with India modifying Felon as per our needs.
If we can get a new upgraded Indian version by 2030 and start recruiting them by 2031 we could have 60 as a stop gap until Amca arrives in 2040 latest
Imo
140 super Mki plus 60 Su57mki is a must by 2035
Backed by 200plus Tejas both one and two
Get two more Rafale sqds with F4.2 version
Spend big money on Air defense and Awacs and definitely get longer range hypersonic missiles both air to.air and air to ground
Rafale F5 with Neuron 2 is perfect candidate for MRFA. Let's see.
 
How do you tolerate those Weird crazy Pakistanis on Pee Dee Eff
The fact that he asked that question in the manner that he did amazes me. So many Indians question the authenticity of the strikes that India did and the losses that IAF had taken. I say it is 10...so will he say they took down 10. I saw zero push back against such wild claims by even many so called "nationalist analysts".
 
The fact that he asked that question in the manner that he did amazes me. So many Indians question the authenticity of the strikes that India did and the losses that IAF had taken. I say it is 10...so will he say they took down 10. I saw zero push back against such wild claims by even many so called "nationalist analysts".

I still wonder why Indians engage with Pee Dee Eff Lunatics

Twitter allows us to Reply to their Lies and Denials

That forum is only for their ie Pakistani Fetishes and wet dreams
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: redpanda and Shan
I have question for you guys
It's challenging question I asked the Pakistan defense forum outright

Why did the Pakistan air force with it's superior chinease kill chain PL15 not fly and challenge the Indians on the 9th May when we hit air bases with ease and precision

What did India also do different because the leadership did suggest change in tactics between 7th and 9th May
 
What did India also do different because the leadership did suggest change in tactics between 7th and 9th May
This part is very simple and easily noticeable from all the official communication. On the 7th May action there was obvious strict order to engage only the terror camp targets and the tri services were forbidden to hit any military target/asset even those giving protection cover over some wide area.
Then once Pak military started retaliate attack that order was reversed and cleared to target military asset.
I think that day or the next in press conference it was mentioned some radar site was hit (pic presented later) and some AD unit near Lahore was neutralised possibly via Harrop (we saw destroyed truck or something clip footage). Quite obvious this unit engaged the IAF package. This was the initial escalation during daytime. Then the night events started unfolding.