Iran may not like our attitude, just as we do not like Iran's attitude. In 2022, China and Iran signed a $250 billion investment agreement. But Iran casually abandoned it. because just a casual promise made by Biden. In 2024, Iran abandoned China and directly reached an agreement with Türkiye and Russia on the collapse of the Syrian regime.
Because they have seen through your big talks and debt trap right next door.
Truly rocks that they couldn't protect the pakistanis from being decimated on the ground.
The only people who will believe the stuff you write are on weibo and the Pakistanis' on Tik Tok. Keep peddling this stuff to them. I assure you they will buy it.
What a bunch of rubbish. In 2023, China hoped to provide direct financial assistance to Syria, but was rejected by Iran. Chinese companies have obtained almost no infrastructure projects in Syria. In comparison, our investment in Iraq is 20 times that of Syria.
Sure pal. Your promises are as sturdy as a fine chinese vase in our homes. Totally will not break if they fall as promised on Alibaba store.
Chinese consider themselves as a world military power but unfortunately PLAN cant even effectively fight beyond 500 km from China lol. Speaking of Barak 8,seems you have a special feelings for it because despite randomradio and others explaining it's capabilities in retail you still are in denial. MRSAM version of Barak 8 can reach Mach 3 and has successfully showed its capability in the recent conflict. It is safe to say Barak 8 performed far better than Hoe Qock 9B which failed to defend even strategic targets inside Pakistan lol.
You import S400 because your Politbuero members don't even truth their own scientists and systems. After all the General Secretary had to run to Russia to beg for supersonic cruise missile technology 20 years ago, it was only after Russians told you nyet you made YJ12, which uses roughly the same design as the STAR missile which we are going to use for target practice
I also remember someone who was boasting how their country can intercept Mach 25 ICBM with decoys and MIRV but their air defence systems failed even against 10-15 cruise missiles
. Truly if you are the average quality of academician that China churns out, then the great mathematician Shing Tung Yau was correct in his assessment that China is no match compared to the US in university level education even now.Chinese consider themselves as a world military power but unfortunately PLAN cant even effectively fight beyond 500 km from China lol. Speaking of Barak 8,seems you have a special feelings for it because despite randomradio and others explaining it's capabilities in retail you still are in denial. MRSAM version of Barak 8 can reach Mach 3 and has successfully showed its capability in the recent conflict. It is safe to say Barak 8 performed far better than Hoe Qock 9B which failed to defend even strategic targets inside Pakistan lol.
You also forget about the AD1 and PDV 1 systems which India has already deployed around the capital. PDV can easily intercept any ballistic missile in Pakistans arsenal. Infact considering that China cannot even build a system which can perform as good as Barak 8 it's quite likely HQ19 is inferior compared to PDV 1 even let alone PDV 2 and cannot intercept complex maneuvering targets such as Pralays let alone hypersonic glide vehicles such as LRHASM or BM04. That's considering if your Hoe Qock 19 will survive the initial days without getting hit by Rudram ARMs lol. After all, the strategic depth of your attack dog in South Asia is poor and they cannot station HQ19 too far from the border.
BTW, THAAD is not designed to intercept cruise missiles, and you said HQ19 is the same as THAAD. You and many other comrades are also boasting HQ19 can defeat Brahmos. I hope you guys are not so illiterate that you cannot distinguish between terminal targets travelling in ballistic trajectory and cruise missiles flying at low altitudes lol.
You import S400 because your Politbuero members don't even truth their own scientists and systems. After all the General Secretary had to run to Russia to beg for supersonic cruise missile technology 20 years ago, it was only after Russians told you nyet you made YJ12, which uses roughly the same design as the STAR missile which we are going to use for target practice
I also remember someone who was boasting how their country can intercept Mach 25 ICBM with decoys and MIRV but their air defence systems failed even against 10-15 cruise missiles
If you read carefully dear comrade I said fight, not merely sail that far, which even fishermen with decent boats and GPS can do
. You think PLAN lasts a chance against US Navy anywhere 500 km off the Chinese coast? USS Seawolfe and Virginia class will eat your Liaoning or whatever it is you call it for lunch but don't worry maybe China's global fleet of fishermen can save the sailors who get stranded. Less than 20 years of carrier experience with 0 stealth naval fighters or AWACS and we should believe PLAN lasts a chance against USN . A dog would last longer infront of a lion perhaps.You are right, but Barak 8 is an anti-aircraft missile that is equipped in large quantities by the Indian Navy, Army and Air Force. The maximum speed announced by Israel is Mach 2 and the range is 80-100 kilometers. If you have other data, you must provide your evidence.Chinese consider themselves as a world military power but unfortunately PLAN cant even effectively fight beyond 500 km from China lol. Speaking of Barak 8,seems you have a special feelings for it because despite randomradio and others explaining it's capabilities in retail you still are in denial. MRSAM version of Barak 8 can reach Mach 3 and has successfully showed its capability in the recent conflict. It is safe to say Barak 8 performed far better than Hoe Qock 9B which failed to defend even strategic targets inside Pakistan lol.
You also forget about the AD1 and PDV 1 systems which India has already deployed around the capital. PDV can easily intercept any ballistic missile in Pakistans arsenal. Infact considering that China cannot even build a system which can perform as good as Barak 8 it's quite likely HQ19 is inferior compared to PDV 1 even let alone PDV 2 and cannot intercept complex maneuvering targets such as Pralays let alone hypersonic glide vehicles such as LRHASM or BM04. That's considering if your Hoe Qock 19 will survive the initial days without getting hit by Rudram ARMs lol. After all, the strategic depth of your attack dog in South Asia is poor and they cannot station HQ19 too far from the border.
BTW, THAAD is not designed to intercept cruise missiles, and you said HQ19 is the same as THAAD. You and many other comrades are also boasting HQ19 can defeat Brahmos. I hope you guys are not so illiterate that you cannot distinguish between terminal targets travelling in ballistic trajectory and cruise missiles flying at low altitudes lol.
You import S400 because your Politbuero members don't even truth their own scientists and systems. After all the General Secretary had to run to Russia to beg for supersonic cruise missile technology 20 years ago, it was only after Russians told you nyet you made YJ12, which uses roughly the same design as the STAR missile which we are going to use for target practice
I also remember someone who was boasting how their country can intercept Mach 25 ICBM with decoys and MIRV but their air defence systems failed even against 10-15 cruise missiles
China successfully conducted six mid-course anti-missile tests in 2010, 2013, 2014, 2018, 2021 and 2023, using DF31 as a target missile to verify the effectiveness of the HQ29 system, which can effectively counter the Indian Agni-5 missile and its future development models.Chinese consider themselves as a world military power but unfortunately PLAN cant even effectively fight beyond 500 km from China lol. Speaking of Barak 8,seems you have a special feelings for it because despite randomradio and others explaining it's capabilities in retail you still are in denial. MRSAM version of Barak 8 can reach Mach 3 and has successfully showed its capability in the recent conflict. It is safe to say Barak 8 performed far better than Hoe Qock 9B which failed to defend even strategic targets inside Pakistan lol.
You also forget about the AD1 and PDV 1 systems which India has already deployed around the capital. PDV can easily intercept any ballistic missile in Pakistans arsenal. Infact considering that China cannot even build a system which can perform as good as Barak 8 it's quite likely HQ19 is inferior compared to PDV 1 even let alone PDV 2 and cannot intercept complex maneuvering targets such as Pralays let alone hypersonic glide vehicles such as LRHASM or BM04. That's considering if your Hoe Qock 19 will survive the initial days without getting hit by Rudram ARMs lol. After all, the strategic depth of your attack dog in South Asia is poor and they cannot station HQ19 too far from the border.
BTW, THAAD is not designed to intercept cruise missiles, and you said HQ19 is the same as THAAD. You and many other comrades are also boasting HQ19 can defeat Brahmos. I hope you guys are not so illiterate that you cannot distinguish between terminal targets travelling in ballistic trajectory and cruise missiles flying at low altitudes lol.
You import S400 because your Politbuero members don't even truth their own scientists and systems. After all the General Secretary had to run to Russia to beg for supersonic cruise missile technology 20 years ago, it was only after Russians told you nyet you made YJ12, which uses roughly the same design as the STAR missile which we are going to use for target practice
I also remember someone who was boasting how their country can intercept Mach 25 ICBM with decoys and MIRV but their air defence systems failed even against 10-15 cruise missiles
Barak 8 can reach Mach 3 specifically the MRSAM variant which successfully intercepted Fatah 2.
bulgarianmilitary.com
. Maybe YJ12 poses a threat but our STAR missiles will train our AD to handle supersonic threats (which Barak 8 can already deal with, a test barely one month ago defeated supersonic sea skimming target). DF series missiles are easily handled by AD1 and PDV 1 which has multiple successful interceptions of missiles of DF series class. Even PAD is capable of intercepting any DF missile launched from 3,000 km meaning it can easily intercept DF 11-15. DF11-15 have horrendous accuracy btw, your DF15 has an accuracy of only 300 meters, while our Prithvi 1 from the 1980s achieved no more than 50 m CEP (admittedly with Intel processors as guidance system). This means DF series are no way capable of destroying S400 lol, 300 meters is a horrendous accuracy for destroying AD systems. But accuracy has never been a strong point of Chinese missiles, after all the 2021 Chinese hypersonic test missed its target by a whopping 40 km . Indian missiles such as Pralays can now achieve below 10 m accuracy but even we don't claim Pralay can destroy AD systems .No need to reply to this troll. He is standing naked in the square and telling people he has the best clothes. Iran is a non-factor and Pakistanis' are sitting in New York/London. Israelis' and the IAF have proven that chinese AD is BS. He knows it too.Barak 8 can reach Mach 3 specifically the MRSAM variant which successfully intercepted Fatah 2.
India tested Barak 8 SAM - 2-way datalink and speed Mach 3
DRDO conducted two successful flight tests of the MRSAM-Army surface-to-air missile system, learned BulgarianMilitary.com, citing a Indian MoD press release.
As for destroying S400 with ballistic missiles, I admire your confidence
DF31 is way inferior to Agni 5, Agni 5 can carry more warheads and it can reach a higher speed. Against how many DF31 did your HQ series succeed against? Because if you Chinese are that stupid to think that India will launch only 2-3 Agni 5s that too with single warhead then I have nothing to say. If we launched even 20 Agni 5, each eith 6 MIRVs reaching hypersonic speeds, that is over 100 warheads with decoys raining down on China, not to mention our Agni 4 and Agni 3 also being launched along with K4 SLBM. Yea good luck intercepting that my poor friend. Especially K4 which is capable of depressed trajectory quasi ballistic path which means Chinese midcourse interceptor will totally fail infront of it.
This dude thinks DF series missiles with 300 meters accuracy can destroy S400, and while it will be in the air S400 will be shaking its tunnu and do nothing, not to mention AAD and PAD will also be doing nothing, just patiently waiting for the DF missile to fly to us
Don't you have any shame asking others for evidence but not providing the same when asked about your dubious claims?
most of the air forces uses FFM,
Are you dumb or what, do you think we only use s400,
