He can't assert for a stronger Europe by bootlicking the Americans.
The French and Americans don't like each other.
He can't assert for a stronger Europe by bootlicking the Americans.
Yes, we all know the UK isn't capable of fighting squat. Neither is the French or Germans. Germany 2 days worth of ammunition. France? 18 guns was basically 25% of their artillery. I still think the 2k NLAW at the start might have saved Kyiv.
I'm a very pro Ukraine person and pro EU power/integration, but why is Macron such an idiot.
Anyways, USA spends 50% of financial aid and 75% of military aid in Ukraine. France is behind Canada as a % of GDP. Why not fix that first if you want to not follow America.
Europe is some dumb rednecks for thinking distance from China physically means anything in the modern age.
Anyways, it's natural for China to counter America entering their backyard with this. I don't like it obviously, because I think Xi is evil.
France does what it can with what it has in stock.I don't get why France didn't support Ukraine much stronger instead of valuing phone time with Vlady so much.
There are voices in Europe which, while criticising the form of Macron's speech, nevertheless express their support for the idea of European strategic autonomy:My point which I made very early on in this thread is what Macron is proposing is too late in the day. On 24th February 2022 when the first shots were fired in the Russo Ukrainian borders the world but especially the EU wasn't the same again.
The French plan was always to dominate the EU imbuing it with their own independent steak. They couldn't do so alone. In comes Germany as le Francais realised pretty early on they couldn't trust UK to side with the rest of Europe in moves which could essentially undermine Anglo pre dominance which is the same as American pre dominance.
But ze Germans were conflicted. There's not enough to suggest Germany under Merkel shared le Francais thoughts on the future of the EU . In any case an independent foreign policy can only come from an independent Defence industry along with corresponding rise in the armed forces profile of these nations.
If anything under Merkel the armed forces were emaciated . How exactly are you going to build up an independent Defence industry cum armed forces leave alone an independent foreign policy or even economic policy .
By the time the Europeans could resolve this issue to the satisfaction of le Francais 24th Feb occurred.
It's no point giving any importance to what Macron has to say now . His hand which was already weak has been extremely weakened since the invasion .
See it as posturing by le Francais . Macron , Le Francais & their independent streak have essentially been castrated. Although it may sound harsh it's the truth.
There are voices in Europe which, while criticising the form of Macron's speech, nevertheless express their support for the idea of European strategic autonomy:
- BRUSSELS — European leaders are becoming increasingly favorable toward French President Emmanuel Macron's push for "strategic autonomy" away from the United States, European Council boss Charles Michel said Tuesday.
![]()
Charles Michel: Europe warming up to Macron’s ‘strategic autonomy’ push away from US
European Council president says EU cannot ‘blindly, systematically follow’ Washington.www.politico.eu
- SPD parliamentary group leader Rolf Mützenich does not share the criticism of French President Emmanuel Macron's statements on Europe's role in the Taiwan conflict. "We must be careful not to become a party to a major conflict between the USA and the People's Republic of China," said Mützenich on ARD's "Morgenmagazin".
![]()
»Nicht als Anhängsel der USA erscheinen«: SPD-Fraktionschef Mützenich springt Macron zur Seite
Für Aussagen über Europas künftige Rolle zwischen China und den USA ist Frankreichs Präsident in die Kritik geraten. Nun erhält er Deckung von SPD-Fraktionschef Mützenich. Der stichelt zudem gegen Außenministerin Baerbock.www.spiegel.de
They have a $30bn deficit for Q1 2023, so it ain't that big, it would seem. But if you look at the beginning of the war the $ shot up to about 130 roubles, but then it suddenly went right back down. Only China could have done that.By that metric, Europe's done more than what China's done.
But I don't believe China contributed much to Russia's currency. The Russians already had a large forex war chest and that's grown over the last year with a high surplus. In fact I'd argue the Chinese reduced their imports due to lockdowns in their own country.
Yup. Europe buying excess oil & gas to see out the winter shooting up prices all over the world doesn't count at all as per Paddynomics.They have a $30bn deficit for Q1 2023, so it ain't that big, it would seem. But if you look at the beginning of the war the $ shot up to about 130 roubles, but then it suddenly went right back down. Only China could have done that.
No you"re not alone since many countries don't want to follow China or US.Doesn't help our position vis a vis China but it's on expected lines. Any war with China & we're on our own .
France would undergo a change of heart if Russia resumed it's campaign in Europe co ordinating it with the Chinese when the latter invades Taiwan in the not so distant future . The die was cast on 24 th Feb 2022. We're just witnessing what's already been foretold.
I have just say exactly the same on a french forum.I had previously projected (on this forum itself) that Germany may decide that it's not beneficial for it to toe the same line, that the Chinese market may prove to be too lucrative for a manufacturing & export-driven economy like Germany to forego...I did not foresee that it may find France as a partner in it's stand as an 'independent' entity.
That's a real great news for me since it's the best anti dollar policy it can be.'Inde et la Chine ont réduit leurs avoirs en USD en achetant de l’or. Et dans les six prochains mois, les réserves indiennes seront en or seulement et le seront donc de tous les membres des BRICS. L’euro fera l’objet d’un dumping et seule la monnaie nationale aura le statut de monnaie pouvant être utilisée pour le commerce. En août, les BRICS lanceront leur monnaie dirigée par l’Inde. Nous allons redéfinir la façon dont le commerce se fait à travers le monde. La saisie par les États-Unis de 600 milliards d’actifs de la Russie et soutenue par les nations européennes a envoyé un très mauvais signal au monde. J’avais également écrit à ce sujet plus tôt et maintenant chaque pays déplace sa monnaie vers une base d’actifs. lisez ce que les Américains disent eux-mêmes à propos de la merde créée par les États-Unis. Détenir quoi que ce soit en USD signifie qu’une nation est maintenant esclave des États-Unis. Les BRICS détruiront l’USD et l’EURO d’un seul coup dirigé par l’Inde. Nous allons même autoriser le troc.
Yes But it begins with counting how many political supports there are. Charle Michel is not a suprise, but german SPD yes.The issue is how much of that support to Macron translates into support for his initiatives in the EU or even NATO.
The biggest opposition to the Franco German duo's position in NATO comes from the Baltic Republics & Poland egged on quite openly by UK with the US playing final arbiter . There's no reason to disbelieve the same won't be carried over to the EU .Yes But it begins with counting how many political supports there are. Charle Michel is not a suprise, but german SPD yes.
Take your nonsense away. France is a leech on Europe.France does what it can with what it has in stock.![]()
Air Defence Systems
- 2 Crotale NGs Batteries [November 2022]
Multiple Rocket Launchers (2)
- 2 227mm LRU MLRS [November 2022]
Self-Propelled Artillery (18)
- 18 155mm Caesar 6x6s [Delivered from May 2022 onwards] (Delivered along with thousands of shells)
Towed Artillery (15+)
- 15+ 155mm TRF1s [October 2022] (Purchased by Ukraine through the security capacity building fund)
Armoured Fighting Vehicles (40)
- 40 AMX-10 RC(R)s [Delivered from March 2023 onwards]
Armoured Personnel Carriers (~60)
- ~60 VABs [July 2022]
Vehicles
- TRM 2000 Trucks [August and September 2022]
- TRM 10000 Trucks [October 2022]
- GBC 180 Trucks [Before October 2022]
- Peugeot P4 SUVs [July and August 2022]
Engineering Equipment
- Motorised Floating Bridges [To be delivered] (Purchased by Ukraine through the security capacity building fund)
Man-Portable Air Defence Systems (MANPADS)
Mistrals [February or March 2022]
Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs)
MILANs [March 2022]
- FGM-148 Javelins [March 2022]
Anti-Tank Mines
- HPD2A2s [June or July 2022]
Radars
- Ground Master 200s [To be delivered]
Small Arms
7.62mm ANF-1 General-Purpose Machine Guns [July 2022]
Ammunition
- 12.7mm Ammunition [March 2022]
- OF 37 HE Hand Grenades [May 2022]
- 155mm Artillery Rounds For Caesar SPG [Delivered from May 2022 onwards]
Miscellaneous Equipment
- Fuel [March or April 2022]
- ''Protective Equipment'' [March 2022]
- Uniforms [March or April 2022]
- Electro-Optical/Infra-red Systems [March 2022]
- Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance support (Including ongoing access to French satellite imagery)
![]()
Arms For Ukraine: French Weapons Deliveries To Kyiv
www.oryxspioenkop.com

Who wouldn't want a stronger Europe? That is far different than what the EU will do with this force. Who of these have come out and said they have walked away from the Indo pacific issues? Macron is the only one I've seen.Key European politicians back Macron's pursuit of ‘strategic autonomy’
They have a $30bn deficit for Q1 2023, so it ain't that big, it would seem. But if you look at the beginning of the war the $ shot up to about 130 roubles, but then it suddenly went right back down. Only China could have done that.
Key European politicians back Macron's pursuit of ‘strategic autonomy’ amid debate on Europe's foreign strategy
By
Hu Xijin
Published: Apr 13, 2023 01:06 AM
![]()
Yes, Europe does not want to be a puppet of the US - Global Times
www.globaltimes.cn
![]()
French President Emmanuel Macron delivers a speech to the Nexus Institute in the Amare theatre in The Hague on April 11, 2023 as part of a state visit to the Netherlands. Photo: VCG
Josep Borrell, the European Union's chief diplomat and Annalena Baerbock, German Foreign Minister, originally planned to visit China from April 13 to 15 together. Borrell said on twitter Wednesday that he has tested positive for COVID-19 and therefore unfortunately will need to postpone his visit to China.
Europe, wandering amid the current geopolitical upheaval, needs to make a choice. During his visit to China, French President Emmanuel Macron said, "Long live the friendship between France and China!" on his social media account. At the end of his trip, he told the media on the plane that he was against following the US, emphasizing Europe's strategic autonomy and saying Europe should not get "caught up in crises that are not ours" - what he meant is clearly the crisis in the Taiwan Straits. This touches on the most important strategic myth of Europe and causes a strong shock.
US Senator Marco Rubio questioned whether Macron's speech can represent Europe or only France. Former British Prime Minister Liz Truss criticized Macron's recent trip as "a sign of weakness." Other US politicians and mainstream media also attacked Macron, and some voices in Europe also wanted to pressure Macron. But President of the European Council Charles Michel sent key support for Macron on Tuesday, saying European leaders are increasingly supporting Macron's push for "strategic autonomy" away from the US.
"On the issue of the relationship with the US, it's clear that there can be nuances and sensitivities around the table of the European Council. Some European leaders wouldn't say things the same way that Emmanuel Macron did ... I think quite a few really think like Emmanuel Macron," Michel noted. "There is indeed a great attachment that remains present … For this alliance with the US. But if this alliance with the US would suppose that we blindly, systematically follow the position of the US on all issues, no."
Prior to Michel's comments, French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire also backed Macron, saying that the French president is "perfectly right to demand independence and European sovereignty." Just because we are allies of the US does not mean we should be against China, he added.
It has become a big debate to clarify the foreign strategy when Europe may be strategically lost and defend its own strategic interests. Macron, who clearly does not want to back down in the face of pro-US opinion in the US and Europe, further said during a visit to the Netherlands on Tuesday that the EU must form an independent position in five key areas, including trade, competitiveness and European industry.
"We want to be open," he said. "We want allies, we want good friends, we want partners. But we always want to be in a situation to choose them. Not to be 100 percent dependent on them. We must be able to choose our partners and shape our own destiny."
France, Germany and the European Union are undoubtedly closer to the US than to China. They have more ties in culture and values, and through NATO tie the two sides of the Atlantic. In the reality of globalization, driven by actual conditions and their own interests, they become US allies and partners of China at the same time.
The current situation is that China respects the autonomy of the EU and actively interacts with the EU in terms of trade in accordance with international rules. However, the US wants to force the EU to move away from its own interest in its relationship with China and move closer to US' China strategy. From preventing European countries from using Huawei's 5G network equipment to demanding further "decoupling" from China in the field of semiconductor technology, it is the US that decides, and Europe follows. Moreover, the bargaining chip put forward by the US is that if European countries do not cooperate, they will face sanctions from the US. No country likes this feeling of being a "vassal."
Next, the US wants Europe to absolutely cooperate with it in building a "Western Taiwan Strait Policy." They want to stand by to sanction China as they did to Russia once the Chinese mainland uses force to maintain national unity. Turning the Taiwan Strait crisis into a "European crisis" is to turn Europe into a tool and use it as a new strategic bargaining chip for the US to play against China on the Taiwan question.
The purpose of the US in doing all this is to maintain its own hegemony. Washington tries to describe the US hegemony as "Western hegemony," while what Europe feels is inequality similar to the "master-servant" relationship. A cold reality is that Europe, which lacks strategic autonomy, is one of the most obvious signs of Western decline. The EU's economic volume once accounted for 30 percent of the world's total. With the economic downturn and Brexit, the EU's GDP now only accounts for 17 percent, but the share of US GDP in world economy has shrunk much less.
The Ukraine war has intensified the EU's dependence on the US for security. When there is a lot of room for debate on whether Europe is helping the US or the US is providing security for Europe, Washington has adopted a "savior" attitude toward Europe. Gordon Chang, one of the main advocates of the "China collapse" theory in the US, reprimanded Macron on Twitter, saying: "if #Europe should not help the #US on #Taiwan, why should the US help Europe on #Ukraine?" This is already blackmailing Europe.
The reality of China-EU relations is very complicated. In particular, Europe, like the US, has ideological differences with China. The US tries to use ideological differences to cover up its geopolitical conflicts with China, describing its containment of China as "a democracy vs autocracy struggle." Some Europeans were fooled, but most Europeans are not. The cooperative relationship between Europe and China will not be smooth. When referring to Taiwan, Macron said Europe should "avoid the trap to be caught in the crises which are not ours," and that the EU should not be a follower of the US. This is destined to be the inner voice of most people in Europe. Yes, Europe does not want to be a puppet of the US.
The author is a commentator with the Global Times.
Who wouldn't want a stronger Europe?