Lok Sabha passes Citizenship Bill amidst Opposition outcry

So jihadis in Burkas cheering for women rights , isnt it an irony? Lmao

Lmao ........

What attire men and woman wish to wear is their freedom, so long as it is not offensive to the general public. Rajasthani woman too wear face veil and that is their right. However just because woman chose to dress differently should not be grounds to deprive their basic like entering a place of worship, like temples, mosques and Church.
 
What attire men and woman wish to wear is their freedom, so long as it is not offensive to the general public. Rajasthani woman too wear face veil and that is their right. However just because woman chose to dress differently should not be grounds to deprive their basic like entering a place of worship, like temples, mosques and Church.
Muslim women aren't allowed either nor a Christian woman can become pope. While we all have seen that pastor roaming free after raping nuns. Lol
But a woman muslim woman holding a banner that reads no to Brahminical patriarchy while her religion treats her views as 1/4th of her husbands and can give divorce on whatsapp chanting talaq is hypocrisy
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Nikhil and vsdoc
Muslim women aren't allowed either nor a Christian woman can become pope. While we all have seen that pastor roaming free after raping nuns. Lol
But a woman muslim woman holding a banner that reads no to Brahminical patriarchy while her religion treats her views as 1/4th of her husbands and can give divorce on whatsapp chanting talaq is hypocrisy

Muslim women with a voice tend to be the most militant. Blinkered. And hypocritical.

Fact.

It's like how neo converts are always the most venomous.

Cheers, Doc
 
Muslim women aren't allowed either nor a Christian woman can become pope. While we all have seen that pastor roaming free after raping nuns. Lol
But a woman muslim woman holding a banner that reads no to Brahminical patriarchy while her religion treats her views as 1/4th of her husbands and can give divorce on whatsapp chanting talaq is hypocrisy

The movement to ban triple talaq was led by Muslim woman and definitely woman should be allowed to enter mosques, temples and church without any restriction based on misogynist tradition. Hindu woman also cannot become priests at our temple( infact non Brahmans cannot become priest in most Hindus temples). We Hindus have not exactly covered ourselves in glory when it comes being socially progressive.
 
The movement to ban triple talaq was led by Muslim woman and definitely woman should be allowed to enter mosques, temples and church without any restriction based on misogynist tradition. Hindu woman also cannot become priests at our temple( infact non Brahmans cannot become priest in most Hindus temples). We Hindus have not exactly covered ourselves in glory when it comes being socially progressive.

Wayyyyy ahead of Muslims.

Don't beat up on yourself where not warranted buddy.

Ask any Parsi (if it's inevitable) which cross faith he'd have his daughter or sister marry into ....

Cheers, Doc
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deathstar
The movement to ban triple talaq was led by Muslim woman and definitely woman should be allowed to enter mosques, temples and church without any restriction based on misogynist tradition. Hindu woman also cannot become priests at our temple( infact non Brahmans cannot become priest in most Hindus temples). We Hindus have not exactly covered ourselves in glory when it comes being socially progressive.
Haa then tell them to look into your own religion and then interfere in others. We Hindus are atleast undergone various reforms over the years but the desert cult hasnt
 
Wayyyyy ahead of Muslims.

Don't beat up on yourself where not warranted buddy.

Ask any Parsi (if it's inevitable) which cross faith he'd have his daughter or sister marry into ....

Cheers, Doc

We Hindus are way ahead because of socially progressives forces struggled against conservative elements for decades, before this progress was achieved. I don't have to remind you that lakh's of people marched out on the streets for days in support of the Sati of Roop kanwar in 1987. Had progressive Hindus given into conservation misogynist forces, north India would be witness to Sati even today.
 
We Hindus are way ahead because of socially progressives forces struggled against conservative elements for decades, before this progress was achieved. I don't have to remind you that lakh's of people marched out on the streets for days in support of the Sati of Roop kanwar in 1987. Had progressive Hindus given into conservation misogynist forces, north India would be witness to Sati even today.

Definitely true.

But my point is that you had a huge headstart.

The only place where Muslim medieval societies had women in positions of importance were societies that were culturally not Arab to begin with.

Like Persia.

Even medieval pre Sati ban Hinduism was way more progressive than what Islam is in the 21st century.

That's saying quite a lot.

The only Muslim countries with women leaders are those of Hindu converts.

Cheers, Doc
 
  • Like
Reactions: S. A. T. A
The movement to ban triple talaq was led by Muslim woman and definitely woman should be allowed to enter mosques, temples and church without any restriction based on misogynist tradition. Hindu woman also cannot become priests at our temple( infact non Brahmans cannot become priest in most Hindus temples). We Hindus have not exactly covered ourselves in glory when it comes being socially progressive.
That is not correct. Hindu community has reformed dramatically during Nehru's time with Hindu code bills (Succession, marriage, minority etc). Muslim reforms were postponed saying they already feel prosecuted may be another time. Hindu reforms would have never happened if these Hindu fundamentals were anywhere near the mainstream.
 
Note to all.

Stop this non-sense of insulting Religious/Linguistic/Geographical Identities.
If you want to troll with North Indian, South Indian Garbage or any other generalization, there are enough forums out there which will tolerate such filth, please use those to spread your hatred.

Here on, if you cannot be civil, don't post.

Regards

Milspec.
 
Man what is the schoolboy nonsense of deleting a post because I said bhancho?

It's the most commonly used word in the Hindi vocabulary.

If people use BC, bc, or bhanc*d, you let it through. Is that not stupid, petty, and typically sarkari?

@Milspec @nair

Cheers, Doc
 
Man what is the schoolboy nonsense of deleting a post because I said bhancho?

It's the most commonly used word in the Hindi vocabulary.

If people use BC, bc, or bhanc*d, you let it through. Is that not stupid, petty, and typically sarkari?

@Milspec @nair

Cheers, Doc
Is it that difficult not using such words, if you come across such posts report them and will do the same.
 
Is it that difficult not using such words, if you come across such posts report them and will do the same.

It's not at all offensive man.

You're a bong. In the US? But most places here it's just a form of speech.

You're not actually telling the other guy that he copulates with his sister.

Why get so autocratic?

Cheers, Doc
 
Man what is the schoolboy nonsense of deleting a post because I said bhancho?

It's the most commonly used word in the Hindi vocabulary.

If people use BC, bc, or bhanc*d, you let it through. Is that not stupid, petty, and typically sarkari?

@Milspec @nair

Cheers, Doc
These are Gaalis.... and will remain one.... In civilised world..... We will not allow such words......
 
  • Like
Reactions: vikata