Operation Sindoor: India Strikes Terroist Camps Inside Pakitsan

I don't think IAF would have used a towed decoy to mimic on a real fighter plane. rather, they might have used a Banshee target drone and attached a similar transmitter module similar to a towed decoy and fed the data from a hard drive similar to Rafale radar details, and That's why PAF identified around 70 fighter planes in the air, which are there to saturate the air defense.
 
No, US and China will NEVER work together against India.

Because... the intents are totally different.

For instance consider Japan. Japan is the ideal nation that US likes. Economic powerhouse, militarily strong but diplomatically neutered.
China on the other hand HATES Japan which can compete with it on any front including economic one.

The same is true with India... US does not want an India that has an independent foreign and military policy. It wants another Japan.
China wants ... well, India to disintegrate with resulting "states" to be fully Chinese puppets.

They are not the same. US wants a compliant but strong India. China does not want any India.

Both countries want India balkanized.
 
Pékin mobilise ses attachés de défense à l’étranger pour tirer profit des attaques informationnelles visant le Rafale
Beijing mobilises its defence attachés abroad to capitalise on information attacks targeting the Rafale
During Operation Sindoor, carried out by India to destroy positions held by terrorist organisations in Pakistan, Islamabad claimed to have shot down six Indian fighter jets, including three Rafales, using its Chengdu J-10s armed with PL-15 long-range air-to-air missiles supplied by China. And it did so without providing any evidence... Nevertheless, Dassault Aviation's fighter-bomber was then the target of a massive information attack.

That said, the Pakistani military did not necessarily seek to question the qualities of the Rafale, given that several of Pakistan's ‘friendly’ countries have chosen this aircraft to modernise their air forces. Its intention was mainly to suggest that Indian pilots were not up to scratch... unlike its own. ‘It is a very powerful aircraft, provided it is used properly,’ said General Aurangzeb Ahmed, spokesman for the Pakistani Air Force.

For its part, the Indian Air Force (IAF) unofficially admitted that it had lost three fighter jets. One of these was most likely a Rafale. Nevertheless, it achieved the objectives set for it during Operation Sindoor.

"Beyond the losses, the Indian operation must be assessed in terms of its scale and complexity [...] The mere fact that the IAF was able to strike targets despite Pakistan's air defences and carry out subsequent attacks demonstrates its ability to conduct precision coercive operations," summarised the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in a note published on 21 May.

However, via thousands of social media accounts, images created by artificial intelligence and footage taken from video games, the campaign to denigrate the Rafale continued thereafter... and it continues today, with China, as might be expected, pulling the strings.

According to the Associated Press, which cites a French intelligence service [which the agency did not specify], Chinese embassy defence attachés were mobilised to exploit these information attacks against the Rafale, in particular to try to convince countries that had already ordered the aircraft, such as Indonesia, not to buy any more, and to encourage other potential buyers to choose Chinese-designed aircraft.

Of course, Beijing has denied the Associated Press's reports. ‘These allegations are pure rumours and slander. China has always taken a cautious and responsible approach to military exports, playing a constructive role in regional and global peace and stability,’ the Chinese Ministry of Defence said.

After keeping quiet, the French authorities finally responded to these information attacks.

"The Rafale was not targeted at random. It is a particularly high-performance fighter jet, sold for export and engaged in a high-visibility theatre. In this type of configuration, the aircraft becomes as much a military vehicle as a political or economic symbol. As such, the disinformation campaign observed relied on networks favourable to the Rafale's industrial competitors. A number of foreign information ecosystems thus relayed narratives aimed at promoting the superiority of alternative equipment, particularly Chinese designs," the Ministry of the Armed Forces responded.

More broadly, the ministry believes that the Rafale is not the only target: this smear campaign also seeks to undermine ‘the national image of strategic autonomy, industrial reliability and strong partnerships.’

In the Senate on 1 July, the Minister of the Armed Forces, Sébastien Lecornu, set the record straight. "We have heard a lot of nonsense about the Rafale in the military operations between India and Pakistan. The real feedback we have from state to state and air force to air force is the demand to be able to quickly replenish ammunition stocks, particularly complex missiles, which is a decisive issue for certain manufacturers," he said.

Then, during his trip to Toulon for the commissioning of the Tourville submarine and the inauguration of the Missiessy No. 2 basin, Mr Lecornu hammered home the point in the pages of Var Matin.

During the clash between India and Pakistan, "only one [Rafale] aircraft was shot down and the pilot survived. This had no impact on the marketing of the aircraft. What is interesting is the information war that arose around the loss of the aircraft. Being able to sell fighter jets means playing in the big leagues. And in the big leagues, the level of competition is incredibly fierce," explained the minister.

He added: "The Rafale, which is currently enjoying great success in exports and will continue to do so, has been targeted because it is disruptive. Then again, I note that when an aircraft is shot down in Ukraine, whether it is American or Soviet, no one thinks of writing articles questioning the quality of that aircraft. That says a lot."

It will be encouraged by the anti-French cabal in the West too.

Interesting, isn't it? I told you long ago that Rafale will be judged by how it performs in India, which necessitates the prevention of downgrading tech for France's own benefit. Now France is also a victim by association of the massive anti-India narrative being played out in the West.
 
US/China ---- Both Supports congress party and wanted Modi out ..how does the US expect a economically good India with rahul gandhi at helm and modi out .

US/China -- Both funds militants in north east and want to destabilize India's north east .

US/China -- Both funds and support porkistan army against India ( Our Deputy army chief said we were fighting against 4 countries , the 4th one is definitely US )

US/China -- Both doesn't want a technologically advanced India ( US assassination of our scientist , sabotaging our space launch and China stopping resources to stop our manufacturing are few examples)

Since US/China can have tactical agreement when it comes to few topics like they had in the past ....i dont see any reason why they will not work together to bring congress back which is enough to achieve their agenda .

Both prefer Congress, but for different reasons. One wants to create a dependency, the other wants to weaken the country.

But yeah, both have been working together to bring the Congress back to power. The US DS, European Globalists, and the CCP are practically in cahoots with each other in many areas.
 
Both prefer Congress, but for different reasons. One wants to create a dependency, the other wants to weaken the country.

But yeah, both have been working together to bring the Congress back to power. The US DS, European Globalists, and the CCP are practically in cahoots with each other in many areas.
Whether it's BJP or CONgress what needs to be looked into is how deep China or the West has infiltrated our bureaucracy. Modi has crushed the leftist Indian media and 90% of the media houses tow his line now. The next step is hunting down and killing corrupt Babus who have been taking ghoos from the ch!nks and the baboons.
 
Whether it's BJP or CONgress what needs to be looked into is how deep China or the West has infiltrated our bureaucracy. Modi has crushed the leftist Indian media and 90% of the media houses tow his line now. The next step is hunting down and killing corrupt Babus who have been taking ghoos from the ch!nks and the baboons.

Frankly, nothing's gonna happen without a supermajority. Until then it's gonna be the usual crap.

The SC needs reforms first.
 
What is almost certain is that IAF used decoys like never before. Whether IAF used the towed decoys or not is not confirmed.

Aurangzeb is stuck showing Radar plots which showed contacts offline after missile impact. Funny thing is - if they claim this method is accurate they end up acknowledging IAF's 2019 F-16 kill too.
 
I didn't say both China & the US want the Congress in power . You mentioned it. I was merely echoing your talking point which I agree with.

However what I disagree with is the fact both of them are acting in concert with each other which is nonsense.

Where the end goals of both are at opposite ends of the spectrum for you to suggest that they'd first get rid of Modi & get in the Congress without first getting a fix on the agenda translates to meaning you don't know how this works.

For context , the US got rid of the Shaikh Hasina Wajed government in BD. That was a slap on the face of China more than India for she gave the Chinese basing rights for their naval ships & submarines in a naval base constructed by the Chinese in Chattogram, where she refused to extend the same accomodation to the Americans.

As far as India goes while we weren't very happy with SHW but she represented the best of the worst on offer there as subsequent events proved. Since both India & China's interests were served with SHW at the helm are we to assume both of us had the same goals ?

During peak of cold war China and America has worked together to contain Russia ...can you tell me when india/china worked together that way?..So ur comparison of India/China with US/China( who has history of working together) is absurd ...now coming to congress , Sonia signed a secret agreement with CCP , opened up Indian economy with cheap Chinese goods and gave away 500 Sq.Km to chinas salami slicing . Now the same congress entered into civil nuclear deal with US , Purchased so many US military hardware , deployed Sukhoi to northeast and many other co-operation . Now there can be only two conclusion here , either Sonia/Rahul Gandhi has amazing diplomatic skills to manage two superpowers ( even hardcore congressmen wont agree) or two smart nations US/China knows how to extract their pound of flesh from congress ...If u understand basics of politics done by congress its not hard to conclude which one is true .