Israel, US Strike Iran After Weeks Of Warning, Explosions Heard In Tehran

Military targets vs water?

Welcome to war 101.

That's the point though, it's not just civilian infrastructure, power is needed for weapons production and bunker ventilation for that matter. Water desalination and cluster bombs on cities on the otherhand is a little hard to frame as a military objective, but if one side does it, you can be sure the other will follow. Now you begin to see just how much the US has held back so far.


No kidnapped children yet. That's a little hard to frame as a military objective too. Not too many bombed hopsitals either. Or completely flattened towns and cities. just saying.

Iran already has targeted desalination, threat is a response to action.

Source is utter crap. It's the Guardian for a start.

Well, you weren't bothered about Ukraine suffering while refining Russian oil so...

That makes no sense. Imports relatively little energy, has own oil and gas in North Sea, but will be hardest hit???:ROFLMAO:

The UK wasn't even consulted beforehand, but if there's a chance of getting rid of the murderous terrorists running Iran and stopping them getting nukes, I support it. Not sending any troops though, the other gulf states pushing the US to remove the regime can do that.
Bombed children are even worse than kidnapped children you know like the bombed children in Iraq as well but your pea sized brain will continue whataboutism and will fail to see America invading Iraq was no less than Russia invading Ukraine.
 
Military targets vs water?

Welcome to war 101.

That's the point though, it's not just civilian infrastructure, power is needed for weapons production and bunker ventilation for that matter. Water desalination and cluster bombs on cities on the otherhand is a little hard to frame as a military objective, but if one side does it, you can be sure the other will follow. Now you begin to see just how much the US has held back so far.


No kidnapped children yet. That's a little hard to frame as a military objective too. Not too many bombed hopsitals either. Or completely flattened towns and cities. just saying.

Iran already has targeted desalination, threat is a response to action.

Source is utter crap. It's the Guardian for a start.

Well, you weren't bothered about Ukraine suffering while refining Russian oil so...

That makes no sense. Imports relatively little energy, has own oil and gas in North Sea, but will be hardest hit???:ROFLMAO:

The UK wasn't even consulted beforehand, but if there's a chance of getting rid of the murderous terrorists running Iran and stopping them getting nukes, I support it. Not sending any troops though, the other gulf states pushing the US to remove the regime can do that.
Ya'll literally supported Pinochet who made former Nazis use dogs to r*pe some of his dissidents. Like your morality is so small its not even possible to stomp it with a shoe. But because Iraqis Chileans Vietnamese Guatemalans Cambodians etc etc don't look like you ig their deaths by invasion and bombing are justifiable lol. I bet if we didn't have nukes your tribe would bomb us too one day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pixxel
h
My reality is the words said by high ranking U.S. Politicians and high ranking U.S. officials and U.S./ Western media.

Given your apoplectic biasness and retardness, it was expected you would be unable to look.

Well here's another chance.

Even Hilary Clinton said * we created al-quaeda*



Post in thread 'Israel, US Strike Iran After Weeks Of Warning, Explosions Heard In Tehran' Israel, US Strike Iran After Weeks Of Warning, Explosions Heard In Tehran



And 10million+ also attends funeral for a killed general.

Them being evil doesn't have to do with majority of people being anti regime.

Like majority of U.S. people voted for a pedophile.

Or how U.S. regime collapsed Iranian currency for its own evil agenda.
And one of the two major protests was initiated by U.S. by collapsing Iranian currency.


You have provided no proof that *majority* of Iranians wants regime gone and shah back.


Also the 30000 is a western number.
Iran claims 3000.
Reality will be somewhere in the middle.


Time of Israel reported 10million+ on various cities all over the country.



Another lie by the U.S. apologist.

Bias? You don't even argue in good faith to begin with .

Calling the fact that us created isis, al-quaeda a eastern propaganda without any proof, while high level u.s officials and politicians themselves accept it.

Shows the level of BIAS and peice of shit character you have.
hey hey calm tf down. We can still be civil while making our points
 
h

hey hey calm tf down. We can still be civil while making our points
The other guy is not debating in the good faith to begin with.
He's not here to share his just point of view, he's here for U.S. centric apologetic propaganda.

Unilaterally trying to show U.S. side as the morally superior, dismissing argument wih actual sources of high level u.s politicians,officials admissions of creating isis etc as *eastern propaganda* without any credible counter of it own.

Justifying U.S evil deeds/war crimes as * happens in war*, but will still use moral standards to demonify the Iranian mullahs for their crimes/evil dead, not for the sake actual morals, but as a weponised justification for attack on Iran.

Supports nuking Iran, supports attack on Iranian civil infra, water desalination plants etc, but will use morals as a weapon to show Iran as a more evil side and U.S as good side.

In the same breadth will consider russia evil for all their deeds, but will support same deeds of u.s against Iran.

His shifting between might is right attitude when it comes to u.s actions, and moral judgement when it comes actions of all other players is open for all forum members to see.

He's a peice of shit & a traitor for his own country's immediate interests too.
 
The other guy is not debating in the good faith to begin with.
He's not here to share his just point of view, he's here for U.S. centric apologetic propaganda.

Unilaterally trying to show U.S. side as the morally superior, dismissing argument wih actual sources of high level u.s politicians,officials admissions of creating isis etc as *eastern propaganda* without any credible counter of it own.

Justifying U.S evil deeds/war crimes as * happens in war*, but will still use moral standards to demonify the Iranian mullahs for their crimes/evil dead, not for the sake actual morals, but as a weponised justification for attack on Iran.

Supports nuking Iran, supports attack on Iranian civil infra, water desalination plants etc, but will use morals as a weapon to show Iran as a more evil side and U.S as good side.

In the same breadth will consider russia evil for all their deeds, but will support same deeds of u.s against Iran.

His shifting between might is right attitude when it comes to u.s actions, and moral judgement when it comes actions of all other players is open for all forum members to see.

He's a peice of shit & a traitor for his own country's immediate interests too.
He may be all of the above but i don't think losing your temper is going to help anyone or stop him from doing anything either. Its just going to ruin the atmosphere of the forum.
 
He may be all of the above but i don't think losing your temper is going to help anyone or stop him from doing anything either. Its just going to ruin the atmosphere of the forum.
It helps me and others , by calling people out like him, who try to deliberately manipulate forum environment.


And letting him continue with that moral what about ism & moral blackmail and selective demonification for his agenda actually ruins the atmosphere of the forum, not me calling him out.

&
Its not * He may be* , its * He is*
 
@babablacksheep

Do you know how many times India features on American television? About once every 5 years -- either when there is a natural catastrophe, or when an airplane with an American goes down. Sorry if this is going to sound harsh, but no vanilla westerner in their right mind is looking to debate Indians on an online forum. You just don't picture into our everyday life - you're not even Mexicans to us. I myself am here to combat my depression as my country descends into Civil War 2.0 and my fat *censored* is too lazy to join a No Kings rally.

Some are here to build a catalog of Russian weapons. Others to hawk their own baguettes. And some indeed to push propaganda.

Something to ponder if you haven't come across the quote below by J.A. Bezmenov:

"The main emphasis of [an agent] is not in the area of intelligence at all. Only about 15% of the time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage and such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion or active measures ... or psychological warfare"

It's up to you if you want them to live rent free in your head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Do you know how many times India features on American television? About once every 5 years -- either when there is a natural catastrophe, or when an airplane with an American goes down. Sorry if this is going to sound harsh, but no vanilla westerner in their right mind is looking to debate Indians on an online forum. You just don't picture into our everyday life - you're not even Mexicans to us. I myself am here to combat my depression as my country descends into Civil War 2.0 and my fat *censored* is too lazy to join a No Kings rally.
Don't care & don't wanna know about whatever firangis do or think about, you're free to leave.



What i care about is not wanting a peice of shit spreading delibrate agenda and interacting in bad faith & manipulating manner in the forum that I visit for defence related interests.
 
Don't care & don't wanna know about whatever firangis do or think about, you're free to leave.



What i care about is not wanting a peice of shit spreading delibrate agenda and interacting in bad faith & manipulating manner in the forum that I visit for defence related interests.
Then I suggest you take a cue from some of the others on this thread that are already fighting fire with fire
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Ya'll literally supported Pinochet who made former Nazis use dogs to r*pe some of his dissidents. Like your morality is so small its not even possible to stomp it with a shoe. But because Iraqis Chileans Vietnamese Guatemalans Cambodians etc etc don't look like you ig their deaths by invasion and bombing are justifiable lol. I bet if we didn't have nukes your tribe would bomb us too one day.
We don't use moral blackmail as excuse, like you westerners try to do.
Long time ago. Only recently India supported Russian invasion of Ukraine because it made Ukrainian the only official national language, even though it gave up its nuclear weapons. Now India condemns US attack on Iran even though it has literally murdered 30,000+ civilians, beaten women to death for not wearing a head-scarf and has Uranium enriched to 84%, as well as sponsoring Hezbollah and cluster bombing cities.

So I think it's pretty clear cut.

Bombed children are even worse than kidnapped children you know like the bombed children in Iraq as well but your pea sized brain will continue whataboutism and will fail to see America invading Iraq was no less than Russia invading Ukraine.
You mean like when Russia blew up a natal hospital and a supermarket?

Sure because the Kyiv regime aslo nerve gassed tens of thousands of civilians and invaded a smaller neighbour only 10 years prior... oh no wait, it didn't. :ROFLMAO:

Another lie, are you unable to Google?

** Attack on the Qeshm Island Desalination Plant (7 March 2026)
This specific incident served as the most direct justification for Iran's later strikes on Gulf water facilities. On 7 March, Iran accused the U.S. of bombing a freshwater desalination plant on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz:

Impact: The strike reportedly disrupted drinking water for 30 villages in southern Iran.
Retaliation: The following day (8 March), Iran launched a drone strike on a desalination plant in Muharraq, Bahrain, explicitly stating it was a response to the Qeshm Island.
Didn't happen, Iranian propaganda denied by both US and Israel.

Ah, so justifying attacks on civilian infra when its the U.S. doing it.

War *crimes* by *initiating & threating* attacks on civilian infra
Electricity is used by factories for weapons production.
Well, though good to know you are self aware of being a piece of shit, which makes your behavior of falsely tyring to claim some sort of moral justification for U.S. attack of Iran and crying about Indians not supporting US using morals as excuse , even more of a peice a shit behavior.

As i said before a peice of shit like yourself, is not arguing in any sort of good faith to begin with, and hypocritely crying about being called a peice of shit U.S. Apologist , when its the truth.


Well now, no use in trying to waste my time further with POS like you anymore.

Shove that wool down your *censored*, and get lost.
Some sort of moral justification huh?




 
Last edited:
Long time ago. Only recently India supported Russian invasion of Ukraine because it made Ukrainian the only official national language, even though it gave up its nuclear weapons. Now India condemns US attack on Iran even though it has literally murdered 30,000+ civilians, beaten women to death for not wearing a head-scarf and has Uranium enriched to 84%, as well as sponsoring Hezbollah and cluster bombing cities.
what? India has lost significantly more than anything gained from the ukraine war. It has made mil imports from the sanctioned russia harder, it drastically started tanking our currency cause europe switched away from russian oil which means theyre now also driving up the price of middle-eastern oil and everyone and their mother started scrutinizing Indian imports from russia.

When did India support the russian invasion?





Didnt see any other leader who had access to putin do this. Sure you may call this PR or whatever but i think this makes the stance clear.

Ofc India also got soem benefits as this has now allowed us to diversify oil supply beyond the middle east but thats not enough to offset other losses.
 
what? India has lost significantly more than anything gained from the ukraine war. It has made mil imports from the sanctioned russia harder, it drastically started tanking our currency cause europe switched away from russian oil which means theyre now also driving up the price of middle-eastern oil and everyone and their mother started scrutinizing Indian imports from russia.

When did India support the russian invasion?

India stands for much the same as China as regards Ukraine, pretending to be neutral, while not actually being neutral.

Didnt see any other leader who had access to putin do this. Sure you may call this PR or whatever but i think this makes the stance clear.

Ofc India also got soem benefits as this has now allowed us to diversify oil supply beyond the middle east but thats not enough to offset other losses.
As I've said before, neutrality isn't what's coming out of Indian media and 'online personalities'. Hell, some of the reporting isn't even accurate. In one article on YouTube Hindustan Times showed a Russian aircraft coming down after friendly fire and claimed a Russian shootdown of a Ukrainian jet.
 
From the Daily Telegraph livestream:
The United Arab Emirates is preparing to join a US military operation to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Diplomats in Abu Dhabi said they were exploring how Emirati forces could play a role in the campaign to secure the waterway, which normally accounts for around a fifth of the world’s oil trade.

Officials confirmed to the Wall Street Journal that the country is lobbying for a United Nations Security Council resolution to authorise its military involvement in the conflict.

This move would make the UAE the first Gulf nation to join the war, following frequent Iranian missile and drone attacks in the region.

The intervention could include clearing mines from the strait and supporting any US occupation of islands in and around the strategic waterway.

It comes after Donald Trump told the UK and other allies to “go get your own oil” and to take control of the crucial conduit in a Truth Social post on Tuesday.

The US president told the Telegraph on Wednesday that he was considering pulling out of Nato after the military alliance failed to join his war on Iran.

He is set to deliver an “address to the nation” at 9pm (EST) on Wednesday (2am BST on Thursday) to update on the war’s progress.
 
what? India has lost significantly more than anything gained from the ukraine war. It has made mil imports from the sanctioned russia harder, it drastically started tanking our currency cause europe switched away from russian oil which means theyre now also driving up the price of middle-eastern oil and everyone and their mother started scrutinizing Indian imports from russia.

When did India support the russian invasion?





Didnt see any other leader who had access to putin do this. Sure you may call this PR or whatever but i think this makes the stance clear.

Ofc India also got soem benefits as this has now allowed us to diversify oil supply beyond the middle east but thats not enough to offset other losses.
Arguing with paddy is waste of time and your breath my friend. Our buddy paddy there has a very thick skull inside which there is a very hypocritical amerishill brain. No amount of words will ever make him change his antics. As anonymous brother have enlighten us before paddy belongs to that crowd of creatures you found on European forums who screech when they see any Asian country trading with Russia but at same breath would try to justify European trade with Russia as strategic. They won't ever accept the fact that not obeying the Americans like his good boi self and looking for our own interests is not siding with Russia. To them being neutral is apparently following American whip.