Iran and US agree deal to end war as Israel says its forces will stay in Lebanon

Collected in a cup, Zionist tears taste so good

Israelis denounce Trump’s deal with Iran​

Israeli officials disparaged the peace deal and said Israel’s fight against Hezbollah in Lebanon would go on.
Among Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s supporters and critics alike, in the media and on social media, the mood was clear as Israelis woke up Monday to news of a peace agreement between the United States and Iran: President Donald Trump’s deal is not one that many in Israel like.

Watch the 'israel first' in the US cry
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Photon Vish

Talks set to take place on Friday between the ⁠United States ⁠and Iran on implementing the 14-point agreement to end their war have been cancelled, Switzerland’s foreign ministry has announced.
 
The mainstream Israeli crowd isn't all that different from extremist Muslims. Back in China, we call them 'Blue-Hat Huihui' (Blue-Hat Muslims蓝帽回回)—since Jews wear blue caps here while Muslims wear white ones.They are mainly concentrated around Kaifeng, Henan Province

But honestly, whether it's blue or white, the moment you put that cap on, the police treat you with a whole.
They regularly organize mass protests and stir up trouble, so the government is genuinely afraid of them.

For us, they're all the same—no difference. If I have to say there is any difference, it's that people always show great deference to the rich, but when they see the poor, they assume the poor are beneath them and want to bully them.

If the Israelis were just a bunch of poor wretches, I believe no one would care so much about how they are surrounded or not

Power is something you seize for yourself; it’s never graciously handed down to you as a gift.
The Han Chinese simply lack that ruthless,solidarity, uncompromising grit found in Muslims or Jews.

The Han Chinese here also harbor a deep-seated hatred for Muslims, particularly those from Xinjiang. According to my observations, however, this hostility stems entirely from a subconscious envy. The government acts like a fierce mad dog when facing ordinary Han people, but morphs into a submissive lapdog in front of the Hui Muslims.
Since they are utterly powerless against the state, their only coping mechanism is to despise Muslims behind their backs.
Yet, if a real, physical altercation were to break out with Muslims, these same people would tuck their tails and run faster than anyone else

The slaughter of Jews in Europe was simply because they were indeed formidable, yet not quite powerful enough to control everything. Consequently, they were liquidated by the victors as a perceived social threat. This wasn't the first, second, third, or even fourth time this happened in history.
The very first time was back in ancient Egypt.

Here is a photo I snapped on the street
View attachment 52396
Wow, people protesting in China, I wonder why.

Sorry but until you're a democracy, you can't criticise protests.

No difference? Jewish migrants don't bomb things in Europe, run trucks into people, for the most part nobody even notices them.
 
Last edited:

The principal spoiler of any broader understanding with Iran remains Lebanon.

(INSS, Tel-Aviv)

Tehran is unlikely to accept a situation in which it commits to a comprehensive ceasefire while Israel retains the right to conduct military operations in Lebanon under the broad definition of "removing threats." From the Iranian and Hezbollah perspective, such an arrangement would create a loophole large enough to undermine the agreement itself.

Israel, however, views the issue very differently. Israeli policymakers are unlikely to accept a ceasefire that does not preserve some capacity to act against emerging threats, weapons transfers, or efforts by Hezbollah to rebuild its military infrastructure. In Israeli eyes, a ceasefire that prevents preemptive action risks recreating the conditions that led to previous rounds of conflict.

This leaves a dangerous gray zone between the two positions. Activities that one side considers legitimate self-defense may be interpreted by the other as clear violations of the agreement. Intelligence operations, arms smuggling, force deployments, or limited military strikes could quickly become sources of dispute.

As a result, accusations of non-compliance are likely to emerge almost immediately. The challenge is not necessarily reaching an agreement on paper; it is maintaining one when inevitable incidents occur on the ground.

Ultimately, the issue returns to Washington. The central question is how far the United States is prepared to go in enforcing a ceasefire that both sides interpret differently. If the administration seeks to preserve a broader understanding with Iran, it may face increasing pressure to restrain Israeli military actions in Lebanon. If it chooses not to do so, it risks allowing the Lebanese arena to become the trigger for a wider breakdown in the arrangement.

For that reason, Lebanon remains the most fragile component of any prospective agreement. Even if progress is achieved on the Iranian file, the durability of the broader framework may ultimately depend on whether the competing Israeli and Iranian interpretations of security and deterrence can be managed on the ground.

The Israeli prime minister's decision to continue military operations in Lebanon risks putting his government on a direct collision course with the President of the United States. If Washington's priority is preserving a broader regional understanding with Iran and preventing renewed escalation, continued Israeli strikes could increasingly be viewed not as a contribution to regional stability but as a challenge to American policy.This dynamic is particularly significant because the current administration has demonstrated a strong preference for maintaining direct control over the diplomatic and strategic framework it is constructing. Any perception that Israel is acting unilaterally in ways that jeopardize that framework could generate considerable friction between Jerusalem and Washington.

The risk for Israel is therefore not limited to renewed fighting in Lebanon. It is the possibility of transforming a dispute over military operations into a broader confrontation with the White House itself. Should Washington come to view Israeli actions as threatening a major American diplomatic achievement, the administration's response could be far less forgiving than many in Jerusalem expect.
/END
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BMD
"A U.S. official told me one of the reasons for the postponement could be Iranian demands:

So it's being sold as the US pulled out, but it was after Iran pulled out, Over Israel continuing bombing Lebanon
 
No difference? Jewish migrants don't bomb things in Europe, run trucks into people, for the most part nobody even notices them.
Israel is in a power position with the governments numinous western nations, Including Australia, Why would they attack?

Australia criminalises antisemitism through a series of robust federal and state laws that treat such acts as hate crimes, racial discrimination, and vilification. These legal frameworks have been significantly strengthened to specifically combat a surge in antisemitic behaviour, violence, and extremism.
The legal and regulatory framework criminalising and combating antisemitism in Australia includes:
  • Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Act 2026: This federal legislation expands and strengthens the Criminal Code to impose harsher penalties for hate crimes. It introduces aggravated penalties for preachers or leaders who threaten violence and provides a legal framework to list organisations promoting hate as prohibited hate groups.
  • Federal Hate Speech Laws: Under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, it is unlawful to engage in conduct that is reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate, or intimidate a person or group based on their race, colour, or national/ethnic origin. Antisemitism is legally recognised as a form of racism under this act.
  • Prohibiting Hate Symbols: Public displays of Nazi symbols, including the swastika and the Nazi salute, are illegal and carry mandatory prison sentences.
  • Doxxing Laws: Specific federal laws also make the malicious release of private information—frequently used to target individuals based on their identity or beliefs—a criminal offence.
  • Migration and Visa Powers: The 2026 legislation broadens the government's migration laws, permitting the Minister for Home Affairs to cancel or refuse visas for individuals engaged in hate-motivated conduct.
In addition to these criminal provisions, the government established the role of the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism to lead national strategies, protect Jewish community institutions, and monitor social cohesion.
 
The negotiations effectively cut out one of the major parties involved in the war (Israel) from whatever deal/MoU was being signed or negotiated.

Now expecting that party to honour an agreement that they weren't part of is a tall order. Trump's assertions that he "calls all the shots" in the US-Israel relationship is pie in the sky talk.

Any true negotiated settlement to the Middle-East problem HAS to have Israel at the table. Or there won't be any settlement.
 
Wow, people protesting in China, I wonder why.

Sorry but until you're a democracy, you can't criticise protests.

No difference? Jewish migrants don't bomb things in Europe, run trucks into people, for the most part nobody even notices them.
Blowing things up is such a benevolent act.

Just look at Belgium, that pathetic excuse for a Small country, which killed millions in Africa, not to mention even worse ones like GermanyPig, FrancePig, and the UKPig—those scumbags.

But compared to the Jews, who manipulate prices everywhere and ruin families, leaving people destitute and broken, even those colonizers seem like pure innocent flowers.

For you and everyone you know, chances are you will never experience a suicide bombing attack in your entire lifetime. But the blood that the Jews drain from you—that is 100% guaranteed.
 
Israel is in a power position with the governments numinous western nations, Including Australia, Why would they attack?
So you claim, but no evidence.
Australia criminalises antisemitism through a series of robust federal and state laws that treat such acts as hate crimes, racial discrimination, and vilification. These legal frameworks have been significantly strengthened to specifically combat a surge in antisemitic behaviour, violence, and extremism. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
The legal and regulatory framework criminalising and combating antisemitism in Australia includes:
  • Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Act 2026: This federal legislation expands and strengthens the Criminal Code to impose harsher penalties for hate crimes. It introduces aggravated penalties for preachers or leaders who threaten violence and provides a legal framework to list organisations promoting hate as prohibited hate groups. [1, 2, 3]
  • Federal Hate Speech Laws: Under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, it is unlawful to engage in conduct that is reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate, or intimidate a person or group based on their race, colour, or national/ethnic origin. Antisemitism is legally recognised as a form of racism under this act. [1, 2]
  • Prohibiting Hate Symbols: Public displays of Nazi symbols, including the swastika and the Nazi salute, are illegal and carry mandatory prison sentences. [1, 2]
  • Doxxing Laws: Specific federal laws also make the malicious release of private information—frequently used to target individuals based on their identity or beliefs—a criminal offence. [1]
  • Migration and Visa Powers: The 2026 legislation broadens the government's migration laws, permitting the Minister for Home Affairs to cancel or refuse visas for individuals engaged in hate-motivated conduct. [1, 2]
In addition to these criminal provisions, the government established the role of the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism to lead national strategies, protect Jewish community institutions, and monitor social cohesion. [1, 2, 3]
Big difference between anti-semitism, and criticising the actions of the Israel. Hate speech laws protect all races and religions and actually protect Muslims far more than Jews in those countries.
Israel is in a power position with the governments numinous western nations, Including Australia, Why would they attack?

Australia criminalises antisemitism through a series of robust federal and state laws that treat such acts as hate crimes, racial discrimination, and vilification. These legal frameworks have been significantly strengthened to specifically combat a surge in antisemitic behaviour, violence, and extremism. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
The legal and regulatory framework criminalising and combating antisemitism in Australia includes:
  • Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Act 2026: This federal legislation expands and strengthens the Criminal Code to impose harsher penalties for hate crimes. It introduces aggravated penalties for preachers or leaders who threaten violence and provides a legal framework to list organisations promoting hate as prohibited hate groups. [1, 2, 3]
  • Federal Hate Speech Laws: Under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, it is unlawful to engage in conduct that is reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate, or intimidate a person or group based on their race, colour, or national/ethnic origin. Antisemitism is legally recognised as a form of racism under this act. [1, 2]
  • Prohibiting Hate Symbols: Public displays of Nazi symbols, including the swastika and the Nazi salute, are illegal and carry mandatory prison sentences. [1, 2]
  • Doxxing Laws: Specific federal laws also make the malicious release of private information—frequently used to target individuals based on their identity or beliefs—a criminal offence. [1]
  • Migration and Visa Powers: The 2026 legislation broadens the government's migration laws, permitting the Minister for Home Affairs to cancel or refuse visas for individuals engaged in hate-motivated conduct. [1, 2]
In addition to these criminal provisions, the government established the role of the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism to lead national strategies, protect Jewish community institutions, and monitor social cohesion. [1, 2, 3]
Eventually Hezbollah and/or Hamas will wreck this peace deal, just as they wrecked the relative peace in the first instance 3 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiduva21
Hence why I said on the first page, Zionists claim half the ME as their own
Amd according to muslims, whole world belong to them.(source: Quran)

And its their duty to convert whole world into the submission to islam by any means possible.

But i guess u are too unintelligent to understand this, no wonder why only unintelligent people support terrorist people.

There is a term for you people "useful idiots".

And you people will only cry as no sane givt will ever listen to you people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lolwa
So you claim, but no evidence.
Don't be silly,




Are you saying their isn't an Israeli lobby and paid politicians in the US?


AI Overview

Israel wields its most significant government influence with the United States, primarily driven by deep-rooted military, intelligence, and strategic alliances in the Middle East. Israel also maintains strong diplomatic and economic partnerships with key Western democracies, while expanding regional ties through normalization agreements.
Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade +3

Key Governments and Alliances:

  • United States: The U.S. is Israel's most crucial ally, providing extensive military and diplomatic backing. The bilateral relationship is reinforced by substantial lobbying and shared strategic interests, particularly concerning the containment of Iran.


  • European Union & Western Nations: Israel maintains strong political, technological, and defense ties with several European nations. Germany has a particularly close relationship stemming from historical obligations, and nations like the U.K. and Canada are significant diplomatic partners.


  • The Abraham Accords: Israel has substantial influence and developing economic cooperation with several Arab League nations, most notably the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco. These partnerships focus heavily on trade, cybersecurity, and regional security.


  • Strategic Global Partners: Beyond the West, Israel has forged a strong technological and defense-centric partnership with India, and a major energy and security relationship with Azerbaijan.
 
Last edited:
Don't be silly,




Are you saying their isn't an Israeli lobby and paid politicians in the US?

AI Overview

Israel wields its most significant government influence with the United States, primarily driven by deep-rooted military, intelligence, and strategic alliances in the Middle East. Israel also maintains strong diplomatic and economic partnerships with key Western democracies, while expanding regional ties through normalization agreements.
Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade +3

Key Governments and Alliances:

  • United States: The U.S. is Israel's most crucial ally, providing extensive military and diplomatic backing. The bilateral relationship is reinforced by substantial lobbying and shared strategic interests, particularly concerning the containment of Iran.


  • European Union & Western Nations: Israel maintains strong political, technological, and defense ties with several European nations. Germany has a particularly close relationship stemming from historical obligations, and nations like the U.K. and Canada are significant diplomatic partners.


  • The Abraham Accords: Israel has substantial influence and developing economic cooperation with several Arab League nations, most notably the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco. These partnerships focus heavily on trade, cybersecurity, and regional security.


  • Strategic Global Partners: Beyond the West, Israel has forged a strong technological and defense-centric partnership with India, and a major energy and security relationship with Azerbaijan.
An Israeli lobby does not mean they run the damn thing. There is a Muslim lobby too, a pro-Palestine lobby, a business interests lobby, a pro-cycling lobby, a pigeon-feeder's lobby.... But ultimately it boils down to what the government considers correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Photon Vish
The negotiations effectively cut out one of the major parties involved in the war (Israel) from whatever deal/MoU was being signed or negotiated.

Now expecting that party to honour an agreement that they weren't part of is a tall order. Trump's assertions that he "calls all the shots" in the US-Israel relationship is pie in the sky talk.

Any true negotiated settlement to the Middle-East problem HAS to have Israel at the table. Or there won't be any settlement.
The peace deal so far...

 
Perhaps you should go back a bit further
Jun 14, 2026


Iran said on Sunday there was "no point" in peace talks with the United States, accusing it of failing to uphold its commitments and casting doubt on a deal that Donald Trump had insisted would be signed imminently.

The latest hurdle came hours after Israel -- which launched the war alongside the US in February -- said its military had carried out strikes targeting Iran-backed Hezbollah in Beirut's southern suburbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hyperactive ADD
Ceasefire was supposed to kick in on Friday, Hezbollah broke it.


Hezbollah is an arm of the Iranian military, it's up to them to ensure hezbollah cease and desist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Photon Vish
They could have done it a long time ago. You both sound more like a anti semitic conspiracy theorist.

This is not the place to debate this. You can talk about geopolitics not religion.
Tbh geopolitics is just a subcomponent of religion, unfortunately.
Ceasefire was supposed to kick in on Friday, Hezbollah broke it.


Hezbollah is an arm of the Iranian military, it's up to them to ensure hezbollah cease and desist.
They are arming them just like houthis. The Iranian control is not as much as assumed. I might add that Iran role in the middle east/West asia is very similar to China in that it primarily arms most minor players. They do not control operationally or strategically most of them and their ambitions. They will drop a Chinese/Russian copy missile drop some anti tank or anti air missile. Do they actually control Hezbollah, Hamas or Houthis in any real way, I don't think so.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Photon Vish
Tbh geopolitics is just a subcomponent of religion, unfortunately.

They are arming them just like houthis. The Iranian control is not as much as assumed.
Garbage, they are an arm of the Iranian military. They wouldn't even be in the discussion if they weren't, nor would Iran have launched missiles at Israel merely for attacking a proxy.
I might add that Iran role in the middle east/West asia is very similar to China in that it primarily arms most minor players. They do not control operationally or strategically most of them and their ambitions. They will drop a Chinese/Russian copy missile drop some anti tank or anti air missile. Do they actually control Hezbollah, Hamas or Houthis in any real way, I don't think so.
Hamas they don't fully control but they do give them $350m/year and may well have been involved in the October 2023 attacks. Hezbollah and Houthis however are literally arms of the Iranian military.