How Britain stole $45 trillion from India. And lied about it.

[_Anonymous_]

Just because they don't cry as much doesn't change anything. The Cholas are the reason the Tamils exist in Sri Lanka and we know they've had some trouble with them. We also know India supported the Tamil Tigers up until quite recently.

I've told you before not to chew our brains & insult our intelligence out here. The Tamils were in SL since the 2nd century BCE. I've repeatedly also warned you against posting out here without reading on the subject matter beforehand. Read about Elara. I'm not going to spoonfeed nin cum poops like you.

Further, if they don't cry about it, it means they don't consider any damage done as significant. Matter dismissed - as the honourable courts would say.

Now, run along & post on your favorite subjects - Gaming, juvenile memes, retarded jokes, silly music, etc - all items which you identify with and with which you're identified.

 

[BMD]

I've told you before not to chew our brains & insult our intelligence out here. The Tamils were in SL since the 2nd century BCE. I've repeatedly also warned you against posting out here without reading on the subject matter beforehand. Read about Elara. I'm not going to spoonfeed nin cum poops like you.

Further, if they don't cry about it, it means they don't consider any damage done as significant. Matter dismissed - as the honourable courts would say.

Now, run along & post on your favorite subjects - Gaming, juvenile memes, retarded jokes, silly music, etc - all items which you identify with and with which you're identified.

No, it's because they're not cry babies and they accept history for what it is.

History of Sri Lanka - Wikipedia

The first Tamil ruler of the Anuradhapura Kingdom, Ellalan, an invader, is recorded for the 2nd century BCE.[5]

Ellalan - Wikipedia

Ellalan (Tamil: எல்லாளன், translit. Ellāḷaṉ; Sinhalese: එළාර, translit. Eḷāra) was a member of the Tamil Chola dynasty, also known as "Manu Needhi Cholan".who upon capturing the throne became king of the Anuradhapura Kingdom, in present-day Sri Lanka, from 205-161 BCE.[2][3][4]

Chola dynasty - Wikipedia

The Chola dynasty was one of the longest-ruling dynasties in history. The earliest datable references to this Tamil dynasty are in inscriptions from the 3rd century BCE left by Ashoka, of the Maurya Empire (Ashoka Major Rock Edict No.13). As one of the Three Crowned Kings of Tamilakam, the dynasty continued to govern over varying territory until the 13th century CE.

Wow 16 centuries of theft and plunder and you cry about the British.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44145842?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

TAMILIAN MIGRATION INTO KARNATAKA (THE PERIOD OF CHOLA CONQUEST OF SOUTHERN KARNATAKA AND THE CONSOLIDATION OF POWER FROM 850-1279 A.D)

 

[BMD]

Oh wow, India have plundered for over a millennia and they are complaining about Britain's short-lived empire. I thought that idiot Tharoor was an historian.

 

[CountryFirst]

I've told you before not to chew our brains & insult our intelligence out here. The Tamils were in SL since the 2nd century BCE. I've repeatedly also warned you against posting out here without reading on the subject matter beforehand. Read about Elara. I'm not going to spoonfeed nin cum poops like you.

Further, if they don't cry about it, it means they don't consider any damage done as significant. Matter dismissed - as the honourable courts would say.

Now, run along & post on your favorite subjects - Gaming, juvenile memes, retarded jokes, silly music, etc - all items which you identify with and with which you're identified.

He's a propagandist. His role is to derail meaningful conversations. But why is this forum entertaining them, since this is supposed to be a non-commerical forum?? Please, remove all these people. Keep the forum clean.

 

[Guynextdoor]

I just did in the post you quoted. It talks about more than military colonies. But you ignored my question. If they practiced slavery, brutality and plunder, why does it even matter if they were referred to as colonial empires or not? They also did this for 4 centuries, so quit crying. Given how much golbal GDP was concentrated in this area at the time due to population, you probably owe near a quadrillion dollars including interest.

No- if Saudi has practices then you don't call it a colonizer of it's own people. The practice of slavery etc. are therefore irrelevant. C olonization is an alien power subjugating another for exploitation and nothing else. This is called colonization, not empire building.

 

[_Anonymous_]

No, it's because they're not cry babies and they accept history for what it is.

It's because the Tamils assimilated well into Sri Lanka, that there aren't any complaints of abuse or colonization .Hence , there aren't any claims for reparations.They didn't stay aloof from the native population as the Brits in India. They weren't colonizers, who quit when their rule ended and left for their native land. Try & read. Analyse & assimilate data. I realize I'm asking for a lot. But you can make an attempt, can't you? Inspite of your lineage. Or Is too much to ask?

History of Sri Lanka - Wikipedia

The first Tamil ruler of the Anuradhapura Kingdom, Ellalan, an invader, is recorded for the 2nd century BCE.[5]

Ellalan - Wikipedia

Ellalan (Tamil: எல்லாளன், translit. Ellāḷaṉ; Sinhalese: එළාර, translit. Eḷāra) was a member of the Tamil Chola dynasty, also known as "Manu Needhi Cholan".who upon capturing the throne became king of the Anuradhapura Kingdom, in present-day Sri Lanka, from 205-161 BCE.[2][3][4]

Chola dynasty - Wikipedia

The Chola dynasty was one of the longest-ruling dynasties in history. The earliest datable references to this Tamil dynasty are in inscriptions from the 3rd century BCE left by Ashoka, of the Maurya Empire (Ashoka Major Rock Edict No.13). As one of the Three Crowned Kings of Tamilakam, the dynasty continued to govern over varying territory until the 13th century CE.

Why did you leave out the rest of the article on Elaru in Wikipedia, O'Leary? It didn't suit your agenda, did it?

Here's it -












The Sinhala chronicles are full of praise for Elaru. Show me a single British Governor General who's attracted universal praise among Indians as Elaru did among the Sinhalese chroniclers & we'd talk.

Incidentally, are you aware, that the Sinhalese themselves are an Indian Aryan language speaking ethnic group who landed in Sri Lanka from either the east or the West Coast of India in the 6th-5th century BCE.

See, that's the reason why I've asked you to read up on the subject matter. But such knowledge would be lost on you. Pearls before swine! Potatoes before the Irish!!!

Wow 16 centuries of theft and plunder and you cry about the British.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44145842?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

TAMILIAN MIGRATION INTO KARNATAKA (THE PERIOD OF CHOLA CONQUEST OF SOUTHERN KARNATAKA AND THE CONSOLIDATION OF POWER FROM 850-1279 A.D)

Please refer to the Chalukyas of Badami in the attached article and their conquests in Tamil Nadu - the citadel of the Cholas / Pandyas / Pallavas. As you see, it was in the early 7 th, century CE, preceding the Chola invasions of Karnataka.


Chalukya dynasty - Wikipedia


We can keep going through all such "conquests" & "colonization" By Indic dynasties in India & abroad and you'd find not one equivalence to what the British swines Subjected India or their other colonies in Asia, Africa or Ireland too.

 

[_Anonymous_]

Oh wow, India have plundered for over a millennia and they are complaining about Britain's short-lived empire. I thought that idiot Tharoor was an historian.

 

[Superkaif]

@BMD I think you got snookered again by @_Anonymous_ snookered again.
One can accept you occasionally put up half baked truths but to do it as regularly as you suggests a talent rarely exhibited by hardcore trolls.

On topic one can put a conservative figure on whats owed but what can never be quantified or guessed is the number of lives destroyed and lets not forget the artefacts like the kohinoor - this is systematic looting of a civilisation that cant be replaced or priced.......

 

[CountryFirst]

@_Anonymous_ We should make some bots to counter these pigs. Not worth it to waste our 'human' time.

 

[CountryFirst]

It's because the Tamils assimilated well into Sri Lanka, that there aren't any complaints of abuse or colonization .Hence , there aren't any claims for reparations.They didn't stay aloof from the native population as the Brits in India. They weren't colonizers, who quit when their rule ended and left for their native land. Try & read. Analyse & assimilate data. I realize I'm asking for a lot. But you can make an attempt, can't you? Inspite of your lineage. Or Is too much to ask?



Why did you leave out the rest of the article on Elaru in Wikipedia, O'Leary? It didn't suit your agenda, did it?

Here's it -

View attachment 3906

View attachment 3907

View attachment 3908

View attachment 3909


View attachment 3910

The Sinhala chronicles are full of praise for Elaru. Show me a single British Governor General who's attracted universal praise among Indians as Elaru did among the Sinhalese chroniclers & we'd talk.

Incidentally, are you aware, that the Sinhalese themselves are an Indian Aryan language speaking ethnic group who landed in Sri Lanka from either the east or the West Coast of India in the 6th-5th century BCE.

See, that's the reason why I've asked you to read up on the subject matter. But such knowledge would be lost on you. Pearls before swine! Potatoes before the Irish!!!




Please refer to the Chalukyas of Badami in the attached article and their conquests in Tamil Nadu - the citadel of the Cholas / Pandyas / Pallavas. As you see, it was in the early 7 th, century CE, preceding the Chola invasions of Karnataka.


Chalukya dynasty - Wikipedia


We can keep going through all such "conquests" & "colonization" By Indic dynasties in India & abroad and you'd find not one equivalence to what the British swines Subjected India or their other colonies in Asia, Africa or Ireland too.

You should also show them history from the time of Shiva and Raavan and Golden Lanka and how Lanka came to be. The whole Lanka was built as a gift to Shiva and Parvathy as their family home. Although it was later given to Ravvan as Dakshina because Raavan wanted to live in the same palace with Shiva, being his most devoted. These somalian pirates of yesterday with history spanning 1 or 2 millennia have a vary narrow world view and needs 'enlightment'.

 

[CountryFirst]

@BMD You will loose.

 

[BMD]

It's because the Tamils assimilated well into Sri Lanka, that there aren't any complaints of abuse or colonization .Hence , there aren't any claims for reparations.They didn't stay aloof from the native population as the Brits in India. They weren't colonizers, who quit when their rule ended and left for their native land. Try & read. Analyse & assimilate data. I realize I'm asking for a lot. But you can make an attempt, can't you? Inspite of your lineage. Or Is too much to ask?

Assimilated so well that there was a civil war only recently.

Sri Lankan Civil War - Wikipedia

Prabhakaran—together with Chetti Thanabalasingam, a well known criminal from Kalviyankadu, Jaffna—formed the Tamil New Tigers (TNT) in 1972.[41] This was formed around an ideology that looked back to the 1st Millennium Chola Empire—the Tiger was the emblem of that empire.

The Cholas made them write those chronicles you idiot. I mean, it's like looking at North Korean chronicles on Kim Jong Un.

I have honestly never met such a deluded tribe of crap spouters.

 

[BMD]

@BMD You will loose.

Only because I can't be arsed replying to trash continuously, which is what these threads resemble. Continuously dragging up the same old shit. What is the point of it? You won't get any compensation, anymore than you will compensate others for your transgressions, or we will get compensation for those who invaded us.

 

[BMD]

Incidentally, are you aware, that the Sinhalese themselves are an Indian Aryan language speaking ethnic group who landed in Sri Lanka from either the east or the West Coast of India in the 6th-5th century BCE.

Incidentally, you are aware that Indo-Aryan means the same as Indo-European. Indo European migrants spread throughout Europe and Asia. So there you go, by your logic that gives us some kind of right to invade India. I rest my case.

Indo-European migrations - Wikipedia

So there you go, it wasn't an invasion, it was just a dispute between two Indo-Aryan kingdoms.

 

[_Anonymous_]

Assimilated so well that there was a civil war only recently.

Sri Lankan Civil War - Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_Civil_War

About as well assimilated as the Ulsters in NI or the Catholics there too. How long has that saga been going on?

The Cholas made them write those chronicles you idiot. I mean, it's like looking at North Korean chronicles on Kim Jong Un..

What's the connection between Elara & the LTTE - a terrorist organization, as recognized by the UK too?

I have honestly never met such a deluded tribe of crap spouters.

Excluding the Irish? Why, thanks for admiting to the truth, scrotumhead!!

 

[_Anonymous_]

It's because the Tamils assimilated well into Sri Lanka, that there aren't any complaints of abuse or colonization .Hence , there aren't any claims for reparations.They didn't stay aloof from the native population as the Brits in India. They weren't colonizers, who quit when their rule ended and left for their native land. Try & read. Analyse & assimilate data. I realize I'm asking for a lot. But you can make an attempt, can't you? Inspite of your lineage. Or Is too much to ask?



Why did you leave out the rest of the article on Elaru in Wikipedia, O'Leary? It didn't suit your agenda, did it?

Here's it -

View attachment 3906

View attachment 3907

View attachment 3908

View attachment 3909


View attachment 3910

The Sinhala chronicles are full of praise for Elaru. Show me a single British Governor General who's attracted universal praise among Indians as Elaru did among the Sinhalese chroniclers & we'd talk.

Incidentally, are you aware, that the Sinhalese themselves are an Indian Aryan language speaking ethnic group who landed in Sri Lanka from either the east or the West Coast of India in the 6th-5th century BCE.

See, that's the reason why I've asked you to read up on the subject matter. But such knowledge would be lost on you. Pearls before swine! Potatoes before the Irish!!!




Please refer to the Chalukyas of Badami in the attached article and their conquests in Tamil Nadu - the citadel of the Cholas / Pandyas / Pallavas. As you see, it was in the early 7 th, century CE, preceding the Chola invasions of Karnataka.


Chalukya dynasty - Wikipedia


We can keep going through all such "conquests" & "colonization" By Indic dynasties in India & abroad and you'd find not one equivalence to what the British swines Subjected India or their other colonies in Asia, Africa or Ireland too.

Still haven't received any answers here, Paddy? Care to reply to all the points raised.

 

[_Anonymous_]

Incidentally, you are aware that Indo-Aryan means the same as Indo-European. Indo European migrants spread throughout Europe and Asia. So there you go, by your logic that gives us some kind of right to invade India. I rest my case.

Indo-European migrations - Wikipedia

So there you go, it wasn't an invasion, it was just a dispute between two Indo-Aryan kingdoms.

Indo Europeans is a generic term given to a language family which includes Gaelic. Yes - the Irish too. The exceptions to the rule - which is about a remarkable group of people across millennia whose language spread & influenced others from Ireland in the extreme west to Xinjiang in China in the East. From Russia in the North to Greece in the South.

What's native to our part if the world are the Indo Iranians - common ancestral group to most of Central Asia, Iran & the sub continent. However, the Indo Aryans were native exclusively to the sub continent.

Going by your logic, the English were right in humping you - an event which lasted 7 centuries & a habit reflected in your current Taoiseach's proclivities.

What's the church's position on it? Do they condone it? Why did it take an economy with the highest GDP/capita and by most estimates an advanced nation, to pass laws approving abortion, a few months ago - a privilege, if your mom enjoyed, in all probability, would have exercised, thereby preventing us from enduring you out here.

Tell me, do the Irish in UK enjoy affirmative action? What's the average education that an Irishman in the UK have? High school diploma? Acquired in pubs mostly?

 

[Guynextdoor]

Only because I can't be arsed replying to trash continuously, which is what these threads resemble. Continuously dragging up the same old shit. What is the point of it? You won't get any compensation, anymore than you will compensate others for your transgressions, or we will get compensation for those who invaded us.

give us aback our money

 

[Amal]

As with all colonization, there is also a mutual benefit.
In the french case: Algeria => Alger city was built by the french. All the roads were built by the french. So are the harbours... We didn't detroy all when we left.
So the final bill is a little bit different.

It's not mutual benefit. You had to leave all the infrastructure there as you couldn't ship it back to France. It's the same case as in India.

Pretty sure that the natives were made to pay for it in one way or the another.

 

[Bon Plan]

It's not mutual benefit. You had to leave all the infrastructure there as you couldn't ship it back to France. It's the same case as in India.

Pretty sure that the natives were made to pay for it in one way or the another.

No. We could have destroyed it before leaving !