Dassault Rafale - Updates and Discussion

Key Aspects of the Rafale in the Report:
Current Status and Deployment:

The Rafale is the primary combat aircraft of the French Air and Space Force (AAE) and the French Navy, with 107 Rafales in the AAE and 41 in the Navy as of 2024.
It is described as a "4.5 generation" multirole fighter, emphasizing its versatility in air-to-air and air-to-ground missions.

Upgrades and Standards:

The Rafale is undergoing continuous upgrades, with the F4 standard being deployed in three iterations (F4.1 in 2023, F4.2 in 2025, and F4.3 in 2027). These upgrades include enhanced radar capabilities, a new IRST (Infrared Search and Tracking) system, and improved electronic warfare systems.
The F5 standard, expected by 2035, aims for significant advancements, including a new radar (RBE2X), improved IRST, and enhanced SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) capabilities.

Capabilities:

The Rafale is equipped with the Meteor air-to-air missile, which provides long-range engagement capabilities, placing it at the intersection of 4th and 5th generation fighters.
It is noted for its low-altitude penetration capabilities, described as the "poor man's stealth," allowing it to operate effectively in contested environments.

Challenges:

The Rafale lacks stealth technology (LO/VLO), which limits its ability to compete with 5th-generation fighters like the F-35 or J-20 in high-intensity conflicts.
The report highlights the shortage of munitions and the need for increased stocks to sustain prolonged operations.

Role in Future Conflicts:

In coalition operations, the Rafale is expected to play a supportive role alongside 5th-generation fighters, leveraging its advanced capabilities in air-to-air combat and precision strikes.
However, its effectiveness is constrained by its non-stealth design and reliance on external sensors for targeting.

Conclusion:
The Rafale remains a cornerstone of French airpower, with continuous upgrades enhancing its multirole capabilities. However, its lack of stealth technology and limited munition stocks pose challenges in high-intensity conflicts. While it excels in low-altitude penetration and air-to-air combat, its role in future conflicts may be more supportive, relying on coalition partners with advanced stealth capabilities. The F5 standard aims to address some of these limitations, but the Rafale's effectiveness will depend on maintaining adequate munition stocks and integrating new technologies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Yikes bad report for 5gen. Got this from Kerala Tourism agencies.

key points in the report:

  • Lack of availibilty (MC) is a key handicap. 5gen forces may be relegated to a one day role in coalitions, relying on allies with every day fighters.
  • The 5th-gen stealth fighters struggles against Rafale in deployment; its availibilty are insufficient for parity
  • F-35 would be available for only 7,5 hour / month and then totally absent in high-intensity wars
  • F-35 arer simply too expensive and unsustainable
Nice trolling and deflection from the actual report. Are you denying these claims?
 
Nice trolling and deflection from the actual report. Are you denying these claims?
I just put perspectiv and show that a plane can be 28gen it has no value at all if it can't fly. Complex planes come with FMC and MC rate much to low that limit their role in too few operations.

Rafales comes with a 80% MC rate, 2 times higher than any 5gen and probably this rate would be even more important in war times. It can be used in every day operations, not 5gen. And it has demonstrated a very efficient way to survive against PL15 and HQ19 without passive VLO.

The specific problem for the F-35 is that its sustain chain is by far too small considering its huge quantity of problems quite in every parts of the plane. 25 engineer deploy in Kerala and no solution for now ? Why ? How much spares parts for the UK have gone to Israël and are not available for UK ?
 
Last edited:
Stranded British fighter jet F-35 expected to return home by July 23Onmanorama StaffPublishe...
 
GwJkPaLWcAEB93J
 
Stranded British fighter jet F-35 expected to return home by July 23Onmanorama StaffPublishe...

So let me get this straight. You want Germany and Spain to pay two-thirds of the cost and you want 80% of a workshare is that right?
What a wonderful partnership, France is up to its old tricks again

 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Rajput Lion
So let me get this straight. You want Germany and Spain to pay two-thirds of the cost and you want 80% of a workshare is that right?
What a wonderful partnership, France is up to its old tricks again

Indian officials and PSUs would love the deal. I have to pay only 66% for 80% work!! Yippee 🥳🤣🤣

Big Victory for India for getting huge discount and we get to have 20% offset/indigenous work too
 
You have to pay 66% for 20% workshare. The French at their best. They wonder why we cancelled the submarine. :ROFLMAO:
Yes, you would rather pay 368 billion Australian dollars than 50 billion, as long as it is not to the French.





Assault landing training on rough terrain with disembarkation of a light armoured vehicle. #A400M
All seen from the #Rafale aircraft of EC 1/7 ‘Provence’ providing air cover for the operation.

 
Yikes bad report for Rafael. Got this from another forum.

key points in the report:
  • Lack of stealth (VLO) is a key handicap. French forces may be relegated to a supporting role in coalitions, relying on allies with stealth fighters.
  • The Rafale struggles against 5th-gen stealth fighters in exercises; its sensors are insufficient for parity
  • only ~30 of ~ 200 Rafales would be available for sustained high-intensity combat
Other summaries....

"The Future of Air Superiority" by Adrien Gorremans (Ifri, 2025) directly addresses the role of Rafale and non-stealth 4th generation aircraft in a modern air combat environment dominated by stealth fighters and advanced surface-to-air threats.

  • France’s air power (built around the Rafale) is optimized for nuclear deterrence and homeland air defense.
  • In high-intensity coalition warfare, Rafale-based air forces face serious limitations, particularly:
    • Lack of radar stealth
    • No organic SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) capabilities
    • Limited fleet size and munitions stockpiles

  • Rafale may struggle against 5th gen stealth aircraft in direct air-to-air engagements.
  • Electronic warfare, sensor fusion, and networked operations are now key — areas where platform-centric fighters like Rafale may fall behind if not modernized

To keep Rafale relevant in modern high-intensity warfare, the report suggests:


  • Upgrade Rafale's mission systems and munitions
  • Integrate it into a distributed sensor/weapons network (not relying on Rafale alone)
  • Invest in complementary systems: drones, standoff munitions, and cooperative SEAD tools
  • Reserve high-end stealth assets for essential missions, using Rafale in mixed-force roles (Hi-Lo mix)


The report asserts the following
Current Rafale F4 lacks
  • Wide-band radar targeting and geo-location
  • Real-time emitter mapping
  • Full electronic support measures (ESM) suite needed for SEAD coordination
  • AGM-88 HARM / AARGM
  • MALD decoys (Miniature Air-Launched Decoy)
  • LOCAAS or loitering SEAD drones
  • Towed decoy.
  • dedicated trained SEAD units like Wild Weasels

Finally, SEAD using HAMMER is a one way trip unless the Rafale is able to use terrain features (mountains / valley) to get close enough to enemy AD undetected.

Bottom Line​





Here is the URL for English translation.
file:///C:/Users/hewho/Downloads/ifri_gorremans_avenir_superiorite_aerienne_2025.fr.en%20(1).pdf

@Optimist
All I've heard from Rafale fanboys in here is the Rafale is good enough to take on the J-20 and a competitor to the F-35 well we can finally put this BS claim to bed once and for all thanks to this French report shotting down the hype of this fighter from French in here.
Report made by a journalist and a old fighter pilot, "only" Lieutnant Colonel.... it hasn't made a mess in France.

Rafale F4.... F4.1 ? F4.2 ? F4.3 ? not the same.
Sure Rafale lacks a modern anti radar missile.
Sure it is not VLO. Not because Dasault can't produce a VLO fighter, but because it is too costly, and we choose instead to study a kind of electronic stealth... (a frame can't evolve, where an electronic system can).

F4.3 is not induced that we already are working on F5.

We don't have the budget of USA....
 
So let me get this straight. You want Germany and Spain to pay two-thirds of the cost and you want 80% of a workshare is that right?
What a wonderful partnership, France is up to its old tricks again
So let me go straight. Trappier has said it clear. He's never said this.
 
You are making FCAS, why?
No.
We are studying FCAS. the road is long to production.

And as said by Trappier a couple a months ago : "when you will see the cost of a FCAS you will find Rafale very affordable".
I'm quitte sure that FCAS (made alone of with G + Sp) will be purchased in a limited number, and completed by Rafale F5/6/7 ...
 
Report made by a journalist and a old fighter pilot, "only" Lieutnant Colonel.... it hasn't made a mess in France.

Rafale F4.... F4.1 ? F4.2 ? F4.3 ? not the same.
Sure Rafale lacks a modern anti radar missile.
Sure it is not VLO. Not because Dasault can't produce a VLO fighter, but because it is too costly, and we choose instead to study a kind of electronic stealth... (a frame can't evolve, where an electronic system can).

F4.3 is not induced that we already are working on F5.

We don't have the budget of USA....
"The French Air Force has never experienced large force engagements, not even exercised it, since the Cold War, I believe. They have never engaged in network-centric or no-contact warfare. The Rafale is actually built by imitating American experiences, rather than drawing from their own"

US does not lag behind in EW or as you guys call it "electronic stealth" in any way compared to france, infact their ew game is stronger, they even have dedicated ew fighter jets like growler, they understand ew much better than French at this point.
But they still went with stealth and ew as a very important but complimentary system.
Plus along with their understanding, they have lot more real life experience in working of both systems compared to france and any other country.

Ew is not an equivalent or alternative to stealth.
 
"The French Air Force has never experienced large force engagements, not even exercised it, since the Cold War, I believe. They have never engaged in network-centric or no-contact warfare. The Rafale is actually built by imitating American experiences, rather than drawing from their own"

US does not lag behind in EW or as you guys call it "electronic stealth" in any way compared to france, infact their ew game is stronger, they even have dedicated ew fighter jets like growler, they understand ew much better than French at this point.
But they still went with stealth and ew as a very important but complimentary system.
Plus along with their understanding, they have lot more real life experience in working of both systems compared to france and any other country.

Ew is not an equivalent or alternative to stealth.
Tell me one thing.. we we say jets vs jets.. don't we consider the system and kill chain supporting them? The air defense.

So, let's assume( which is very likely) that pak gets 5th gen FA before 2030. Let's say around 30-40 latest chinese 5th gen.

India even if it orders today is unlikely to get delivery of 5th gen before 2030. Cause 5th gen comes with its whole package requiring time to make and integrate. Assuming china is already making 5th gen for pak as we speak.

So, what option does india have. It certainly can't do FA vs FA outright.

The only option I see now is strengthing the system part. Including AD, detection using radars, AWACS, ISR, Space ISR, UCAV based radars to make a detection field etc.

Will that give IAF enough space to detect threat faster , nuteralise it and degrade enemy system on systems and then do a counter offensive.

Or does 5th gen have something that can't be fulfilled by other systems in the detection domain.

This is not a statement but a question or a query/ confusion/thought.

Assuming 12billion dollar for 60-70 F-35s ( excluding operational cost) what will that 12 billion can get us in AD/A2, AWACS, radars, hypersonics, SAMS etc.. to shoot down their J-35. And minimise the threat.

Even induction of 50 F-35 against 50J-35 today, won't guarantee us a 100% kill rate, suppression, or protection. Will it ?
 
Tell me one thing.. we we say jets vs jets.. don't we consider the system and kill chain supporting them? The air defense.

So, let's assume( which is very likely) that pak gets 5th gen FA before 2030. Let's say around 30-40 latest chinese 5th gen.

India even if it orders today is unlikely to get delivery of 5th gen before 2030. Cause 5th gen comes with its whole package requiring time to make and integrate. Assuming china is already making 5th gen for pak as we speak.

So, what option does india have. It certainly can't do FA vs FA outright.

The only option I see now is strengthing the system part. Including AD, detection using radars, AWACS, ISR, Space ISR, UCAV based radars to make a detection field etc.

Will that give IAF enough space to detect threat faster , nuteralise it and degrade enemy system on systems and then do a counter offensive.

Or does 5th gen have something that can't be fulfilled by other systems in the detection domain.

This is not a statement but a question or a query/ confusion/thought.

Assuming 12billion dollar for 60-70 F-35s ( excluding operational cost) what will that 12 billion can get us in AD/A2, AWACS, radars, hypersonics, SAMS etc.. to shoot down their J-35. And minimise the threat.

Even induction of 50 F-35 against 50J-35 today, won't guarantee us a 100% kill rate, suppression, or protection. Will it ?
We ain't matching plaaf as an near peer for foreseeable future.
We will have major disadvantage In aerial war.
We can focus on other systems, tactics, assymteric warfare to compensate somewhat for it.

There's no complete alternative of better fighter jets, each system is vital and have their own role whether it be fighters, air to air missiles, air to surface missiles, ground based air defense, network Centric systems, awacs, refullers and other force multiplyers, ground based surface missiles.
Tho, you can *somewhat* compensate for lack of one capability by enhancing another capability beyond its original scope, Like having ground based long range systems to target enemy airfields.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
We ain't matching plaaf as an near peer for foreseeable future.
We will have major disadvantage In aerial war.
We can focus on other systems, tactics, assymteric warfare to compensate somewhat for it.

There's no complete alternative of better fighter jets, each system is vital and have their own role whether it be fighters, air to air missiles, air to surface missiles, ground based air defense, network Centric systems, awacs, refullers and other force multiplyers, ground based surface missiles.
Tho, you can *somewhat* compensate for lack of one capability by enhancing another capability beyond its original scope, Like having ground based long range systems to target enemy airfields.
I am not saying FA ain't vital. But we just don't have them. And the budget constraints don't allow us to match them peer by peer.

So, that leaves us with playing to our strength. Change in doctrines. Like fast tracking Aircraft mounted DEW systems. UCAV based jamming mesh. Air to Air long range Hypersonics. Anti AWACS doctrine etc etc..

I still am appaled that despite being the "IT hub" we import sophisticated softwares!! I understand hardware, engineering etc.. but even softwares..

Hopefully, this will change rapidly by leaving it to private players and academia only rather than drdo buying license and then training couple of guys.

Should just start putting out every single software need, the capability needed and leave it to firms to figure it out. Otherwise infosys like firms are useless with job cuts and AI anyway.
 
I am not saying FA ain't vital. But we just don't have them. And the budget constraints don't allow us to match them peer by peer.

So, that leaves us with playing to our strength. Change in doctrines. Like fast tracking Aircraft mounted DEW systems. UCAV based jamming mesh. Air to Air long range Hypersonics. Anti AWACS doctrine etc etc..

I still am appaled that despite being the "IT hub" we import sophisticated softwares!! I understand hardware, engineering etc.. but even softwares..

Hopefully, this will change rapidly by leaving it to private players and academia only rather than drdo buying license and then training couple of guys.

Should just start putting out every single software need, the capability needed and leave it to firms to figure it out. Otherwise infosys like firms are useless with job cuts and AI anyway.
Fighter jets are one type of system.
Other systems are vital too, doctrine is vital too, so is tactic.
Improving these will greatly enchance our operational success and effectiveness, and overdeveloping certain capabilities can compensate somewhat for lack in certain other capabilities.