After Pompeo says ‘tide is turning against Huawei,’ India reportedly weighs 5G ban on Chinese firm

Again you are comparing apples with the oranges. Airtel/Idea/voda are service providers and not tech companies like Ericsson, Siemens or Huwa hua :LOL:

Jio one the other hand can do it due to its part of Ambani conglomerate, which has tech divisions like Redisys and others who do research and development work.

I said the same thing above. So, basically we are in agreement. Anyways i have said whatever i want to say on this in my two posts above. Further discussion will only Derail this thread topic which is Reliance Jio's 5G tech.
 
Anyone else says it, we can be suspicious. But Reliance...this explains why FB, Google etc. are suddenly keen on investing in Reliance.

Reliance Jio has designed and developed a complete 5G solution from scratch. It will be ready for trials as soon as the 5G spectrum is available and can be ready for field deployment next year.





This is a bloody hell of a development. This will save billions in foreign exchange and earn multi bn USD from business. Jio is a true game changer.
 
Huawei data centre built to spy on PNG
Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei built a data centre in Papua New Guinea, which exposed secret government files to being stolen, according to a report that catalogues Beijing's efforts to spy on the Pacific nation.

The report, provided to the Australian government, noted outdated encryption software was deployed by Huawei, while firewall settings were insufficient for a centre designed to store the entire data archive of the PNG government.

"It is assessed with high confidence that data flows could be easily intercepted," said the 2019 report on PNG's National Data Centre.

"Remote access would not be detected by security settings."

5b760f3c0952c37eabe422f4e9d80fbcf05403a0


The Huawei data centre began operating before the APEC leaders meeting in PNG. Mark Schiefelbein

The assessment will heap further pressure on Huawei as it fights to remain as part of the 5G networks in Germany, following bans in Britain, France, the US and Australia.

The US and its allies, including Australia, have become increasingly wary of China seeking to extend its influence among developing nations in the Pacific by extending cheap loans for major projects.

The report on Huawei is the first to document its complicity in Beijing's cyber espionage activities, after more than a decade of rumours and pointed remarks from security agencies.

The Port Moresby data centre was funded through a $US53 million development loan from China's Exim Bank and became operational in 2018, before PNG hosted that year's APEC leaders meeting.

Litany of flaws
The report noted the layout of the data centre did not match the intended design, opening up major security gaps.
"Core switches are not behind firewalls. This means remote access would not be detected by security settings within the appliances," it said.

In a statement, Huawei said: “This project complies with appropriate industry standards and the requirements of the customer.”

The report was commissioned by the National Cyber Security Centre of PNG, which is funded by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

It was written by a cyber security contractor hired by DFAT and the report was then handed to the Australian government.

DFAT declined to comment.

In cataloguing major security flaws, the report, which ran to 65 pages in its original form, said the algorithm used for encrypting communications was considered "openly broken" by cyber security experts two years before being installed in Port Moresby.

The Huawei firewalls in the data centre reached their "end of life" in 2016, two years before the facility was opened.
While the report suggests a deliberate effort by Huawei to deploy lax cyber security, it noted this plan was partially thwarted by the centre quickly falling into disrepair, as insufficient money was set aside for maintenance and operations.

This resulted in many PNG government departments not moving their data into the centre as planned.

The lack of an operating budget meant basic functions such as software licences had expired, while batteries had degraded and were not replaced.

To get the data centre up and running again, Port Moresby sought financial assistance from the Australian government, a request that resulted in the report being commissioned.

Canberra has so far declined to provide funding to upgrade the centre and the report noted that a "full rebuild" would be required to modernise the facility.

This has left PNG with a $US53 million debt to the Chinese government, via Exim Bank, and a data centre that is barely operational.

Lack of funding
China's support for a data centre in PNG, using Huawei technology, was first mooted in 2009 during a visit to Beijing by former prime minister Sir Michael Somare.

The following year, Exim Bank, which is charged with implementing Beijing's trade and strategic objectives, agreed to provide the loan.

But it would take until 2014 for then prime minister Peter O'Neill to launch the project at a ceremony in Port Moresby, where he thanked China and praised Huawei.

"Let me take this opportunity to thank the government of China in making available the concessional facility of $US53 million through the Exim Bank," he said.

The data centre was part of a so-called Integrated Government Information System (IGIS), which planned to link 57 sites in Port Moresby and five regional centres.

As part of the project, the chief secretary of each PNG government department was instructed to move all data into the new centre.

A lack of funding meant only a handful of government agencies moved data into the facility and by early this year PNG was calling the project a failure.

A report completed this year by think tank The Australian Strategic Policy Institute found China had provided $US147 million for digital projects in PNG including the national data centre, the national broadband network and a biometric identity card.

Australia remained the largest donor in the 12 years to 2019 with $262 million provided for digital projects in PNG.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Gautam
Except the vendors like VVDN already mentioned here, two Indian telecom manufacturers to watch out from :



Both of these companies are involved in the deployment of BharatNet optic fibre network.

Especially Tejas as they have a number of product in the 5G space already. They have been supplying critical network elements to Jio for over 3 years now and have gathered enough industry experience. They also have substantial business abroad and seem ready to capitalise on the restrictions imposed on Chinese vendors globally.


They also get defence contracts :

Im using Airtel Xstreme fibre since about a month and its services are way superior to anything BSNL offers in my hometown.
Even at peak hours, when my BSNL broadband used to go in hybernation mode, with Xstreme im getting 108-112 Mbps speed.
There is absolutely zero congestion related issue at any time. ping is less than 5 ms and downloading any large file is breeze.
All in a lesser priced pakage with unlimited STD outgoiung calls panIndia and the Monthly limit is more than 3TB and can be made truly unlimited by paying extra 200 topup on demand.
BSNL ftth sucks.

PS: only real disappointment is that they are giving Chinease huwave routers which is a well known security risk, instead on nokia (due to unavilability of later)
And with optical fibre, I can’t even bypass it by using LAN.
 
Last edited:
PS: only real disappointment is that they are giving Chinease huwave routers which is a well known security risk, instead on nokia (due to unavilability of later)
And with optical fibre, I can’t even bypass it by using LAN.
Airtel Xtreme router is from Huawei ? FTTH routers are fixed aren't they ? As in if you get a Huawei router with your FTTH you can't switch it with something else. Still new to the FTTH scene.
 
Airtel Xtreme router is from Huawei ? FTTH routers are fixed aren't they ? As in if you get a Huawei router with your FTTH you can't switch it with something else. Still new to the FTTH scene.

Nokia or Huawe depending on the availability. Earlier stock was Nokia with better looking router. But huawe has more range.

Yes, you have to authorise the router by Airtel server to make it work(done during installation). Not just company the two routers of same model are not interchangeable as each have a unique ID.

My older BSNL connection was via LAN wire, so therewas total freedom to use whichever brand router you like.

Correction: Its called as adsl port
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gautam
Im using Airtel Xstreme fibre since about a month and its services are way superior to anything BSNL offers in my hometown.
Even at peak hours, when my BSNL broadband used to go in hybernation mode, with Xstreme im getting 108-112 Mbps speed.
There is absolutely zero congestion related issue at any time. ping is less than 5 ms and downloading any large file is breeze.
All in a lesser priced pakage with unlimited STD outgoiung calls panIndia and the Monthly limit is more than 3TB and can be made truly unlimited by paying extra 200 topup on demand.
BSNL ftth sucks.

PS: only real disappointment is that they are giving Chinease huwave routers which is a well known security risk, instead on nokia (due to unavilability of later)
And with optical fibre, I can’t even bypass it by using LAN.
 

Ericsson takes issue with Swedish ban on Huawei: FT​

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Ericsson’s CEO said Sweden’s decision to ban China’s Huawei from its 5G telecoms networks restricts free competition and trade, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday.

Swedish telecoms regulator PTS earlier this month halted 5G spectrum auctions after a court suspended parts of its decision that had excluded Huawei from 5G networks over national security risks.

The Swedish telecoms gear maker’s CEO Borje Ekholm said it was important to have open markets and free competition.

“I belong in that category that believes competition makes us longer term a better company. It may be painful shorter term but longer term it drives us to be more innovative and make better products for our customers,” he told the FT.

Ericsson has won contracts from all three major operators in China to supply radio equipment for 5G networks, while Nokia has not won any 5G radio contracts in the highly competitive market.

Huawei, which has denied being a national security risk, has appealed against Sweden’s decision to exclude it from 5G networks.

China’s foreign ministry has said Sweden should address its incorrect decision to ban Huawei and ZTE to avoid a negative impact on Swedish companies in China.

Ekholm told FT that he expected the overall rollout of the new telecoms networks to be delayed, adding the political focus in Europe should be on rolling out 5G as fast as possible.

“Think about 4G — the debate in Europe was: what is the killer app? The Americans and Chinese rolled out 4G fastest and the app economy for consumers is now dominated by American and Chinese firms,” he said.

“5G is going to be the same but for enterprise. Slowing the rollout of 5G is a risk for the economy. Europe risks falling behind again.”