Let me sort out your web trash once again—the kind you use to create confusion and muddy the waters in a desperate attempt to cover up your own stupidity and fatal errors:
First, you claim that Russia's electronic technology is inferior to China's, and therefore Russian radar is weaker than Chinese radar.
I have already refuted you: Chinese radar is trash compared to Russia's. After all, the Chinese capital is protected by Russian missiles, not domestic products, and China's aerospace and space systems utilize Russian radar, rather than Russia utilizing Chinese radar.
Second, after losing on the first point, you shifted to this argument: you believe Russia is very poor, so it cannot produce sufficient quantities of the T-14 and Su-57.
I have already refuted you: the US and China simply cannot field a tank equivalent to the T-14; in fact, their tanks are far inferior even to the T-72.
Furthermore, whether it was the Soviet Union or Russia, tank production has always been the highest in the world, so there is no reason to doubt the eventual production numbers of the T-14. If you want to compare the T-14's production, compare it with China's most advanced Type 100 and America's most advanced M8—the former is in the double digits, and the latter is in the single digits.
The quantity of M8s is inferior to the T-14.（Not to mention the 2S25）
The quantity of M1s is inferior to the T-80.（Not to mention the T-72/90）
The quantity of M60s is inferior to the T-62.（Not to mention the T-54/55/T-10）
Third, following the collapse of your first two laughable points, you spewed yet another absurd theory: that because Russia is poor, it cannot manufacture weapons. You believe that rich countries can build more weapons.
So, I presented you with counterexamples: North Korea and Iran both have more weapons of similar categories than the United States, yet they are both poorer than the US.
Fourth, after the complete bankruptcy of the 3 points above, you started claiming that Russian weapons are only suitable for well-trained militaries, and that untrained militaries in the rest of the world are useless.
I deeply agreed with your logic and acknowledged that American weapons work better in the hands of the Taliban, which shows that... American weapons are not suitable for well-trained militaries... such as those of India and China. This is entirely your logic.So you guys aren't suitable for buying American weapons either, I don't know what you're sulking about
In all four points above, I refuted you entirely by using your own logic—I don't know why you're getting so angry and flying off the handle.
In fact, admitting your mistake at the very beginning would have allowed you to cut your losses quickly, rather than gritting your teeth only to end up suffering even greater losses in the end
From the above, we can see that you are using the guise of "Chinese radar is better than American radar" to brag to me, but in reality, you don't care about Chinese weapons at all, do you?
All you want to do is seize every moment to belittle Russia. Unfortunately for you, India is still buying Russian equipment and technology in massive quantities, rather than purchasing from your heavenly United States.
So it's useless for you to curse at me here—you should go curse at your own government instead.
.
