Israel, US Strike Iran After Weeks Of Warning, Explosions Heard In Tehran


Days after two Indian-flagged ships were allowed passage through the Strait of Hormuz, external affairs minister (EAM) S Jaishankar hailed the direct talks with Tehran and said it was the most effective way to resume shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

S Jaishankar's remarks came days after Iran allowed two India-flagged LPG carriers to sail through the Strait of Hormuz. In an interview with Financial Times, Jaishankar said that his talks with Iranian officials have yielded results, adding that the communication continues. “If it is yielding results for me, I would naturally continue to look at it,” he said in the interview, noting that “many more” Indian-flagged ships are yet to cross the strait.

He reportedly clarified that every vessel moved through the key waterway individually and there was no “blanket arrangement” with Iran on the matter. He further clarified that Iran received nothing in exchange for the passage of the India-flagged vessels. He cited a “history of dealing with each other . . . which is the basis on which I engaged”, the FT report said. “It’s not an exchange issue,” he said. “India and Iran have a relationship. And this is a conflict that we regard as something very unfortunate," he added.

Notably, during the FT interview, Jaishankar also shared his take when asked whether European countries could replicate India’s arrangement. “Each relationship frankly, in a way stands on its own merits,” he said, adding that comparison would be difficult. However, the EAM said he would be happy to share India's approach with EU capitals.
 
Yeah, but you're talking about "very, very larger numbers" of city-busting missiles. And they are all one-time use.

Both beancounters and strategists have made calculations and figured out that the destroyer is the better option over missiles even when using the same budgeted amount.

An IRBM is supposed to cause damage in many billions, so the use is specialist. As mentioned, nukes, bunker buster, special HVAs, like a carrier.
Iran proved ALL of these objection stupid and obselete. Against the most competent war planners. About time we learn from the REALITY and not from stupid theory. In this war, missiles have been vindicated and conventional bombers have been proven stupid. US lost a number of tankers and fighters worth 300-400 million. And Iran used 1/3rd of that money to inflict MASSIVE damage to US allies.

Its Game Set Match already.

Just so you know, it's extremely difficult to sink large warships. An IRBM may not necessarily sink one of them, especially since it's likely to miss more than hit. And successful hits are more likely to cause surface level damage rather than true structural damage. At the very least, it can help achieve mission kill, but that's about it. 1 missile will probably take out 1 compartment out of half a dozen to a dozen. And to sink such ships, you need to take out 60-70% of such compartments.
Who said one missile wonly?
One missile can completely disable a ship, subsequent hits meaning its airbatteries are out of comission too. Few more hits by drones and missiles and it goes down.

10 missiles + 200 drones = 70 million in ammo vs 1.5 billion dollar down the drain.

Tactical missiles can be built in the thousands. The USAF is planning to build over 10000 JASSM/LRASMs for example. The USN has 4000 Tomahawks. The US Army plans to induct 4000 PrSMs. And Taiwan's building 1000 missiles a year of various types. So tactical missiles are available in the tens of thousands already, and this only complements the main capability.
Its about cost.

Cost of buying one Rafale : 200-300 million (Plane + fuel + ordinances + pilot etc etc etc).
Cost of buying 10 IRBMs + 100 drones? 70 million.

Its not even an argument.

That's merely the cost of the missile. The actual cost is the supporting infrastructure.
Have you calculated cost of running an airbase?
Infra cost in ports, air strip etc is MASSIVE.

Each missile is 17.5 m long. It's as big as an apartment building. Where will be keep them?

Silos? Sure, but who's gonna pay for that? That's why the superpowers only build a few hundred and put nukes in them. The Americans are planning on spending a hundred billion on 400 odd silos.

Trucks and rail cars? Again, where are we gonna place that many? All these are easy targets. At least silos need 2 hits with nukes to take out.

Have you calculated the cost of tunneling?
We have a MASSIVE country. If Iran can tunnel and hide its missiles, India can do too. We have all the space we need. LOL! We have MASSIVE mountains to dig into. We are not running out of space anywhere.

Cost of tunneling with a tunnel bore machine is peanuts compared to cost of making a air bases and ports.

Plus drones just need simple trucks and nothing more.

Take example of Zongi-la tunnel : 13 KM tunnel for 2600 Cr INR or 280 million USD. Thats peanuts compared to multi billion dollar airbase.

And even 10 KM can accomodate 300 missile launchers (assuming each launcher takes 30 meter of space). Two lane tunnel can easily ensure any laucher to move out.

5-6 billion is enough to host 6000 such missiles and launchers. And you can reuse launchers.

For 1/3rd the cost of Rafale deal, you can have ALL of this.

We have nukes for that.
Nukes are problematic diplomatically and nukes do not allow calibrated ramp up of hostility. Plus nukes require centralized command. You can not allow base commanders to let nukes fly. It needs a succession of leadership and strategic command.

Nukes and Iranian style missile complex are complementry and not overlapping.

Nuke are for responding to nukes.

They will use nukes on us.

I think you need to look up the purpose of nuclear deterrence.

What Iran's doing is well below the nuclear threshold, they can get away with it 'cause the US and Israel are doing way worse to them.
No, they will go back. We have nukes too. China will NEVER be the first country to use nukes. Becase that means nuking of entire china.

Simply put with a conventional asymetric missile + drones threat, China will simply stop messing with India militarily. Becase it has more to loose.
 
Iran proved ALL of these objection stupid and obselete. Against the most competent war planners. About time we learn from the REALITY and not from stupid theory. In this war, missiles have been vindicated and conventional bombers have been proven stupid. US lost a number of tankers and fighters worth 300-400 million. And Iran used 1/3rd of that money to inflict MASSIVE damage to US allies.

Its Game Set Match already.

We don't fully know the extent of damage the allies plan to do to Iran. We have to see all that later on to judge.

Who said one missile wonly?
One missile can completely disable a ship, subsequent hits meaning its airbatteries are out of comission too. Few more hits by drones and missiles and it goes down.

10 missiles + 200 drones = 70 million in ammo vs 1.5 billion dollar down the drain.

That's far too less to defeat networked systems. In Op Sindoor, we defeated 1000 drones and missiles while barely even trying.

Its about cost.

Cost of buying one Rafale : 200-300 million (Plane + fuel + ordinances + pilot etc etc etc).
Cost of buying 10 IRBMs + 100 drones? 70 million.

Its not even an argument.

The Rafale will still end up cheaper.

Have you calculated cost of running an airbase?
Infra cost in ports, air strip etc is MASSIVE.

It's far cheaper than what you have proposed.

We have a MASSIVE country. If Iran can tunnel and hide its missiles, India can do too. We have all the space we need. LOL! We have MASSIVE mountains to dig into. We are not running out of space anywhere.

Cost of tunneling with a tunnel bore machine is peanuts compared to cost of making a air bases and ports.

Plus drones just need simple trucks and nothing more.

Take example of Zongi-la tunnel : 13 KM tunnel for 2600 Cr INR or 280 million USD. Thats peanuts compared to multi billion dollar airbase.

And even 10 KM can accomodate 300 missile launchers (assuming each launcher takes 30 meter of space). Two lane tunnel can easily ensure any laucher to move out.

5-6 billion is enough to host 6000 such missiles and launchers. And you can reuse launchers.

For 1/3rd the cost of Rafale deal, you can have ALL of this.

That's just a transportation tunnel. Missile bases are complexes, not merely a hole in the wall.

People live there. You need living quarters, communication hubs, life support systems, security etc. Even without silos.
1.jpg

Instead we build much smaller numbers and disperse them over a large area.

Nukes are problematic diplomatically and nukes do not allow calibrated ramp up of hostility. Plus nukes require centralized command. You can not allow base commanders to let nukes fly. It needs a succession of leadership and strategic command.

Nukes and Iranian style missile complex are complementry and not overlapping.

Nuke are for responding to nukes.


No, they will go back. We have nukes too. China will NEVER be the first country to use nukes. Becase that means nuking of entire china.

Simply put with a conventional asymetric missile + drones threat, China will simply stop messing with India militarily. Becase it has more to loose.

You attack economic centers to "send their economy to the shitter and decimate their population," they will respond with nukes.

Using conventional weapons to attack certain civilian infra in a caliberated manner to a certain extent will be tolerable, like transportation hubs and energy, and we have weapons for that already, and we are seeing that in both Ukraine and Iran. But if you meaninglessly attack civilians without strategy, the only response will be nuclear. It's a red line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12LeadsNeverLie
Iran proved ALL of these objection stupid and obselete. Against the most competent war planners. About time we learn from the REALITY and not from stupid theory. In this war, missiles have been vindicated and conventional bombers have been proven stupid. US lost a number of tankers and fighters worth 300-400 million. And Iran used 1/3rd of that money to inflict MASSIVE damage to US allies.

Its Game Set Match already
While Iran has been holding out, effectively blocking hormuz strait & is causing significant retaliatory damage to US bases, Israel, GCC countries, but the country who has received the most beatings/damage is Iran itself.

Hope its enough for you recalibrate the extent of effectiveness and limitations of various weapons, weapon systems ,doctrines, goals, etc. And able to look the Current REALITY taking place in a more broader way.

And not jumping into shallow conclusion of what's is vindicated and what is stupid, the conclusion itself is wrong and the attempt of simplify it in this way heavily skew the reality taking place at best.
 
Last edited:






Such PDA between the two services brings tears of joy to one's eyes especially if we were to consider participation in the JV with le Francais for the FCAS project wherein all probability , taking a leaf out of the Rafale project , Dassault Aviation would first take on development of the Naval version of the 6th Gen FA .

If so in our case the IN will be expected to lead the project from our end. As you can see the IAF would be more than happy to cede space to the IN to lead the project.

Alhamdulillah !

Like Munira, Trump had also hosted exiled Iranian prince Reza Pehlavi at the WH, not too long ago. He may be parachuted into Iran as its interim leader (a la Md Yunus) before an elected govt loyal to the US takes over.

If Trump wants to deny China access to Iranian oil, he can't leave the Ayatollahs in charge of the country.

At best, he might let them seek asylum in Russia but that would be it.


If the Iranians had one , this war wouldn't be waged.

They reportedly have some weapons grade uranium stashed away someplace. It is probably not deployable on a missile though.
 
Hey, I get what you're saying about forming an independent view and not wanting to be spoon-fed, that's fair. But comparing it to letting a kid stick their hand in fire or poke an animal's butt is a wild stretch. This isn't life-or-death survival; it's checking someone's YouTube lectures.
Neither of the examples I gave were life or death choices. I thought I clearly wrote in such cases the parents of the child intervened. Nor is the You Tube lecture series of that eminent historian a life or death matter which is the reason I urge you to peruse the entire series. Who knows this may just result in an epiphany ! You could thank me later. Or you could thank the professor. Or you could thank both of us.

Asking for one or two concrete examples (timestamps, specific claims, whatever made you call him a 'Han con man' with CCP/MSS ties) isn't lazy or low-IQ, it's just efficient and one of the measures of science and intelligence is making things more efficient.
There's a movie called the 36th Chamber of Shaolin . It's the usual Shaw Bros formulaic film from Hong Kong the equivalent of our masala entertainment.

Long story short - the protagonist loses his parents to a fight with an evil landlord in mediaeval China. He swears revenge & goes to Shaolin to learn what else but Kung Fu .

The chief priest after his ordination as a monk asks him which chamber would he like to begin his training from with the 35th chamber being the last chamber .

Obviously the protagonist opts for the 35th chamber only to see wizened old monks chanting Buddhist mantras & beating the drum in rhythm.

His constant exhortations to them asking the latter to accept him as their disciple irritates one who just waves his hand dismissively in the air causing the protagonist to be thrown out of the room.

All shaken up by the experience when the chief priest who's witnessed the entire event asks him once again where would he like to start , murmurs almost inaudibly - from the very bottom.

I urge you to see that movie. You'd learn a lot . Perhaps then you'd stop making silly requests & asking questions like if the distance between Delhi to Mumbai is 1500 kms & the distance from Mumbai to Delhi is 1500 kms how come it's 364 days from 1st January to 31st Dec but only 1 day from 31st December to 1st January ?

See that's where experience & maturity comes in which you one acquires over the years where one turns old in the process .
You've assumed you've been around longer
No I know for a fact I've been around longer than you are based on the quality of your posts .

Remember - when I was in uniform you were in liquid form , when your mom was combing your hair I was there.
and say you reached that conclusion, so it shouldn't be hard to point me to the exact part that flipped the switch for you.
Answered this above. Re read it till it becomes a moment of epiphany for you.
If it's really obvious across his whole oeuvre, surely there's a smoking-gun moment you can share without making me watch 50+ hours first.
The journey of a 1000 miles begins with a single step . You orgasm with the 1000th thrust . Does that mean you should begin with the 1000th thrust & save yourself all the effort ?

Keep messaging for more such muft gyaan . Makes me feel important even if all this stuff is too intelligent & deeply philosophical for you .

I'm genuinely down to look at it and discuss, hit me with that one thing and we'll go threadbare like you said. No games, just facts.
I can see the reason why several mental health specialists have constantly highlighted the extremely short attention spans of Gen Z .

Apparently all that swiping left ( or right , can't say since I'm too old for those apps ) has numbed the youth who're constantly looking for instant gratification ,lack the attention span & patience for hard work & can't be bothered to put in real efforts .

It's a real pity. You actually seemed intelligent . Or at least you had me convinced at one point you were intelligent. Now , I'm genuinely worried about the future of this country . Hope you didn't graduate during COVID ?
Also please don't ignorantly assume your statements are make people jump to any conclusions cause you aren't.
I'm not interested in validation my boy . Too old for that. Been there & done that . It's you who're looking to be validated.
if you are successfully able to back up any of your claims, we would look at it, assess it and conclude if it has any merit to it.
Answered this above.
 
Americans learning new combat experience and Indian retired vets tweeting plans and policies etc etc on X how to move forward. They couldn't introspect the geography topology and innovate combat skills when in service, giving gyan after retirement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12LeadsNeverLie

sung kang GIF
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Subgradewalker
Like Munira, Trump had also hosted exiled Iranian prince Reza Pehlavi at the WH, not too long ago. He may be parachuted into Iran as its interim leader (a la Md Yunus) before an elected govt loyal to the US takes over.
IMO he's a sideshow. In any case this regime isn't falling now. The idea is to help create an atmosphere where the regime's fall becomes inevitable in the near future.

As I've pointed out before that would entail destroying Iran's NWP , their war waging machinery , their infrastructure followed by their basic infrastructure like electricity supply distribution networks , potable water dams , reservoirs , supplies , IRGC / Basij / other allied para Militias barracks , bases , ammo depots , police stations , administration buildings , etc.

They'd avoid targetting hospitals schools bazaars etc if they can help it. There's a reason for this. This January protests broke out over hyper inflation , the Iranian rial rapidly losing its value , water scarcity in Tehran etc.

Apparently the bazaar merchants / traders were in the forefront of the protests. Now as I've pointed out before this is a very important lobby whose protests against the Shah forced him into exile & support for the mullahs saw them take power.

The last time the revolution was staged it was led by groups as diverse as students , unemployed youths ,women , clergy & young seminarians , political activists like from the Tudeh Party which was the communist party of Iran , lay supporters of Khomeini etc. The proverbial straw that broke the camel's back was when this traders group entered the protests.

Except for the clergy & young seminarians every other group was apparently protesting this January. The die is cast. IMO it's only a matter of time before this regime is history. Assuming hostilities end today I'd give it anywhere between 1-3 years for the regime to collapse.

Most likely what will follow is a bloody civil war a la Iraq Syria Libya etc for the only organization that exists outside the Mullahs ecosystem to an extent is the Artesh or the Iranian Army .

Whether they seize the moment & act as a cohesive group will determine which way the Iran of tomorrow is headed.


If Trump wants to deny China access to Iranian oil, he can't leave the Ayatollahs in charge of the country.
For the Mullahs to resume normal drilling operations & restore other Infrastructure like storage facilities , pipelines , pumping stations etc will take a lot of time . Plus the sanctions are still in place & will likely be strengthened.
At best, he might let them seek asylum in Russia but that would be it.
Nope. It's a fight to the end. Neither Russia nor China will take them in. This is very personal between the Deep State in the US & Israel. They'd want to make an example out of this regime like they did with Gaddafi.

They reportedly have some weapons grade uranium stashed away someplace. It is probably not deployable on a missile though.
Apart from a dirty bomb what else can they come up with ? The facilities to assemble a N device has long been destroyed. What remains will be destroyed in due course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Speedster1
IMO he's a sideshow. In any case this regime isn't falling now. The idea is to help create an atmosphere where the regime's fall becomes inevitable in the near future.

As I've pointed out before that would entail destroying Iran's NWP , their war waging machinery , their infrastructure followed by their basic infrastructure like electricity supply distribution networks , potable water dams , reservoirs , supplies , IRGC / Basij / other allied para Militias barracks , bases , ammo depots , police stations , administration buildings , etc.

They'd avoid targetting hospitals schools bazaars etc if they can help it. There's a reason for this. This January protests broke out over hyper inflation , the Iranian rial rapidly losing its value , water scarcity in Tehran etc.

Apparently the bazaar merchants / traders were in the forefront of the protests. Now as I've pointed out before this is a very important lobby whose protests against the Shah forced him into exile & support for the mullahs saw them take power.

The last time the revolution was staged it was led by groups as diverse as students , unemployed youths ,women , clergy & young seminarians , political activists like from the Tudeh Party which was the communist party of Iran , lay supporters of Khomeini etc. The proverbial straw that broke the camel's back was when this traders group entered the protests.

Except for the clergy & young seminarians every other group was apparently protesting this January. The die is cast. IMO it's only a matter of time before this regime is history. Assuming hostilities end today I'd give it anywhere between 1-3 years for the regime to collapse.

Most likely what will follow is a bloody civil war a la Iraq Syria Libya etc for the only organization that exists outside the Mullahs ecosystem to an extent is the Artesh or the Iranian Army .

Whether they seize the moment & act as a cohesive group will determine which way the Iran of tomorrow is headed.



For the Mullahs to resume normal drilling operations & restore other Infrastructure like storage facilities , pipelines , pumping stations etc will take a lot of time . Plus the sanctions are still in place & will likely be strengthened.

Nope. It's a fight to the end. Neither Russia nor China will take them in. This is very personal between the Deep State in the US & Israel. They'd want to make an example out of this regime like they did with Gaddafi.


Apart from a dirty bomb what else can they come up with ? The facilities to assemble a N device has long been destroyed. What remains will be destroyed in due course.

In many ways, Iran is like Afghanistan. The people may want freedom, education, jobs, economic growth, etc. But their collective national identity is of an ethno-religious state. After all, Iran is the world's only Shia majority country, ruled by Shias.

Judging by the protests among that community here in India, the killing of Khamenei Sr will likely lead to the Iranian people rallying around his successor. They have endured years of Western sanctions and hardships already.

If the clerics survive in power, the Chinese would probably pour money into rebuilding Iran's oil infrastructure (via CPEC expansion and/or picking up stakes in key ports like Chahbahar) in exchange for long term mining rights.

You can be sure the clerics will weaponize at the first possible opportunity. I'd wager NoKo would help them in getting over any tech hurdles with Russia expediting deliveries of Su-35s, Mi-28s and other hardware contracted by Iran.